- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ChatGPT might not be coming for all of us quite yet...
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:36 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:36 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
AUD: 46%;
I'm 33% smarter than ChatGPT
1
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:42 pm to LSUFanHouston
Apparently ChatGPT and I both don't understand how PTO can be viewed as a liability but then just waived at the end of the year
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:43 pm to BigCheese2001x
quote:
This was written in ChatGPT...
I legit almost added a “this is not ChatGPT” disclaimer when I typed that.
No, (maybe sadly) it’s just me.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:43 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:Well yeh, we are smart as shite. I bet it could easily pass the PE or Bar
But the talking bot met its match when Accounting Today ran it through the CPA exam as an experiment: ChatGPT failed utterly in all four sections.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:45 pm to LSUFanHouston
ChatGPT read all the stories about how AI is a threat and decided to tank the exam. Diabolically clever.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:49 pm to CocomoLSU
it does not have access to the web
Posted on 5/10/23 at 2:52 pm to Bottom9
quote:
AUD: 46%;
quote:
I'm 33% smarter than ChatGPT
Failing a section is nothing to brag about.
46 x 1.33 = 61 which is a failing grade.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 3:00 pm to ninthward
quote:
it does not have access to the web
Then who is storing the data it accesses to respond to people's questions? If it's not accessing the web doesn't it need a massive database?
Posted on 5/10/23 at 3:02 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
So your daughter is so lazy and dumb she couldn’t even plagiarize her own paper and had to get you to do it? Haha.
HAHA yeah that's it. ACSHUALLY, she wanted help and I thought let's see what this chatGPT comes up with. We recognized some of the claims were inaccurate and since we are so lazy and dumb, we kept researching not using chatGPT.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 3:02 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
Saw an interview on Rogan yesterday (youtube) and it was an asian guy talking about things like ChatGPT. He was saying how literally all it does is scour the internet for information and present it.
Incorrect.
ChatGPT 3.5 does that, and it's not open to everyone or their API keys
ChatGPT 4.0 does not
Posted on 5/10/23 at 3:13 pm to SuperOcean
quote:
Apparently ChatGPT and I both don't understand how PTO can be viewed as a liability but then just waived at the end of the year
It's basically a forgiven liability of sorts. Not really forgiven... but like that. If the liability is accrued and then waived, the related expense gets reversed.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 3:36 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
My immediate question is... how do they know it is a correct answer?
The price.
Answers are $10.
Answers requiring thought are $20.
Correct answers are $40.
Dumb looks are free.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:20 pm to lostinbr
quote:
But the real jump in AI happens when you combine these LLMs with other AI research. You merge GPT with an image recognition AI and a camera. Now it has sight and can associate words with images. You merge it with a speech recognition program. Now it can have a conversation with a human.
And then you get to the scary part - you give it access to the internet. Now it can actively search out knowledge it doesn’t already possess AND potentially interact with the outside world in a more uncontrolled environment. That means it can take actions much more freely and see the results if those actions. The logical next step is to give it a directive and see what it does. Maybe it cures cancer, maybe it kills us all.
The thing is, there’s an argument that the language part is the most complex and difficult to achieve. That’s why people think GPT and other LLMs are such a big deal.
The interview I referenced talked about how the real advancement will be once something like ChatGPT is combined with quantum computers. He said once the software of CGPT is combined with that advanced hardware, things will really take off.
Here is the clip I saw: LINK
Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:25 pm to LSUFanHouston
I, from time to time, use chat GPT or Google’s bard to ask routine legal questions. No identifying information… I’m not an idiot.
I’m pretty sure it made up three or four legal cases today when I asked it to give me a few cases that stood for a particular proposition in Louisiana law. I’m fairly certain that it also made up the citations. When I pointed it out, it repeated the incorrect citations.
We are a far way off.
It can be great at rewriting sentences for clarity though.
I’m pretty sure it made up three or four legal cases today when I asked it to give me a few cases that stood for a particular proposition in Louisiana law. I’m fairly certain that it also made up the citations. When I pointed it out, it repeated the incorrect citations.
We are a far way off.
It can be great at rewriting sentences for clarity though.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:29 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
ChatGPT, the AI chatbot that's taken the world by storm, has already conquered numerous tests–the Wharton MBA exam, the bar exam, and several AP exams among others. But the talking bot met its match when Accounting Today ran it through the CPA exam as an experiment: ChatGPT failed utterly in all four sections.
Makes sense. The CPA exam is easily the most difficult exam around.
I haven't been overly impressed with AI for accounting purposes. It's useful for scouring a GL, but so far all that's done is create MORE work for auditors, not less. It decided something is a "problem," but doesn't know why and is often egregiously wrong. A person has to go through and verify/test those accounts individually.
This post was edited on 5/10/23 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:31 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
ChatGPT, the AI chatbot that's taken the world by storm, has already conquered numerous tests–the Wharton MBA exam, the bar exam, and several AP exams among others. But the talking bot met its match when Accounting Today ran it through the CPA exam as an experiment: ChatGPT failed utterly in all four sections. — The experiment took place at the Arizent office in New York City's financial district on April 13 in collaboration with Surgent CPA Review. We used two laptops, each running a separate ChatGPT 3.5 Pro account (metering on free accounts, or on GPT 4, would have made the experiment impractical). One laptop ran the BEC and FAR section. The other ran the REG and AUD section. When all test sections were completed, its scores were: REG: 39%; AUD: 46%; FAR: 35% BEC: 48% A 75% score is required to pass a section.
That’s just what the ultra intelligent AI wants you to think
Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:40 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
Saw an interview on Rogan yesterday (youtube) and it was an asian guy talking about things like ChatGPT. He was saying how literally all it does is scour the internet for information and present it. It doesn't care if the information is right or wrong, it just copies it and pastes it in whatever order it determines. He said the reason people say "That sounds like it was written by a human" is it literally was written by someone before. It's basically one huge plagiarizer.
That is basically all it's good for....it's ripping stuff off websites and organizing and typing it out......it's cool but there is no thinking analysis behind any of it and it all reads like a computer program wrote it....maybe that will come later.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:47 pm to PetroBabich
quote:
Then who is storing the data it accesses to respond to people's questions? If it's not accessing the web doesn't it need a massive database?
GPT-4’s training dataset consisted of about 570 GB of text data. It also continues to train itself through interactions with users. While that’s a lot of text data, it’s nowhere near what I would call “massive.” At least not in the way you’re thinking.
That’s why it’s pretty comical when people start downplaying the technology because it gets factual questions wrong - it’s not a search engine. It’s a language model. It’s intended to be able to hold a conversation with a human, not provide factual references.
It can answer a lot of questions either through direct knowledge from its training data (less likely) or context clues (more likely). But it doesn’t “know” everything because it doesn’t have the ability to look up an answer.
The fact that it’s able to do what it does without access to the internet is precisely why it’s so impressive.
Posted on 5/10/23 at 9:48 pm to Jim Rockford
it is probably defending itself on message boards
Posted on 5/10/23 at 9:51 pm to H2O Tiger
quote:
Big 4 employees never gonna get any relief
fml
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News