Started By
Message

re: Catholics to excommunicate priests who follows Washington law about reporting child abuse

Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:27 am to
Posted by Rabby
Member since Mar 2021
1431 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

If I was a priest I would be rouge.
Hopefully, you mean rogue. You have to be a cardinal to be rouge.
But it is encouraging to see that someone has the character to step outside of the human fabricated artificial administration of the relationship between God and His people. There is no brokerage scheme outlined in the actual Word.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5759 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Who wouldnt want to go to that church? I agree with yall in theory, yalls churches sound more fun but I am not here for fun. I am here for the Lord


Nah, you are here to judge others. You aren't even judging different religions but judging those who follow the same God.

How dare you say you are "here for the Lord" in the same statement that you choose spiteful words and judgment.

Pathetic.
Posted by Golfer1865
Member since Apr 2025
170 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:29 am to
quote:

While there was a misguided desire to avoid scandal, there was not a widespread coverup. THe Church was trusting the science,


Posted by bulletprooftiger
Member since Aug 2006
2385 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:33 am to
Yep. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant" ~Louis Brandeis.

I cannot see how anyone could be against reporting child abuse, or, frankly any crime admitted to in a confessional. The religious beliefs of a criminal should not supersede the rights of the victims and society.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
57853 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I wouldnt go to the police but I sure as hell am telling all the undesirables around town about the pedophile that lives in the town and let them do with that information as they wish.
there are many priests that do this - I’ve known a few that have gone to police

None of them will ever be a bishop (ironically they don’t want to be)
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12554 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:34 am to
quote:

I will ask this question again, if we are demanding that priests be a mandated reporter for the safety of children, why are lawyers exempt?

Why shouldn’t they be forced to divulge information that they are told?

This is what I’m trying to wrap my head around. My understanding is that attorney-client privilege and doctor-patient confidentiality do not apply to knowledge of future crimes/harm to others.

I’m less clear on the following:
- Under current rules of the Catholic Church, can a priest divulge information heard in confession that would prevent a future crime?
- Does the Washington law require reporting of all child abuse or just future crimes?

There’s another layer to this, in that child abuse is different from a lot of other crimes. If someone confesses to a priest, lawyer, or psychiatrist that they robbed a bank, I’m not sure that confession is necessarily a strong indicator that they’re going to rob another bank tomorrow. But if someone confesses that they’ve been abusing a child, I think it’s reasonable to assume (or at minimum be highly concerned) that they will continue to do so.

It’s not black & white I suppose - someone confessing to abusing a child 10 years ago is a lot different than confessing to abusing a child yesterday, especially if that child is still under their care.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23034 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:34 am to
Washington Govt knows good and well the Catholic church’s stance on this. This is simply a way for them to make being a Catholic Priest illegal.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27879 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Under current rules of the Catholic Church, can a priest divulge information heard in confession that would prevent a future crime?


No. They can’t. And that’s the problem.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
57853 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:37 am to
quote:

The religious beliefs of a criminal should not supersede the rights of the victims and society.
innocent until proven guilty - in other words that person in the confessional is not a criminal yet
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 11:39 am
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23499 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:38 am to
quote:

These people are the scum of the earth


If you’re referring to those who attention whored themselves writing a law that is both unconstitutional and unnecessary I agree with you.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35482 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Under current rules of the Catholic Church, can a priest divulge information heard in confession that would prevent a future crime?

Nope. There are no exceptions for things disclosed during confession.
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 11:40 am
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
57853 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:39 am to
quote:

And that’s the problem.
it’s not because the priest cannot assume a crime will happen based off of past actions
Posted by bulletprooftiger
Member since Aug 2006
2385 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:41 am to
Why would someone seek confession and absolution for something they didn't do?
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
15074 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Washington Govt knows good and well the Catholic church’s stance on this. This is simply a way for them to make being a Catholic Priest illegal.
They can easily jail priests based on accusations. This is their door to do it, eventually it will expand to all crimes.

This has nothing to do with child abuse and everything to do with athiests punishing religion.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
57853 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Why would someone seek confession and absolution for something they didn't do?
not sure, why would they?

But if you go to confession that does not make you a criminal - that is proven in a court of law, not by a Catholic priest
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175387 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:46 am to
I’m not Baptist but thanks for reading
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
85757 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:

But if you go to confession that does not make you a criminal


not yet

we're working on it
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175387 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:

How else was the church centuries ago going to blackmail parishioners into buying their own forgiveness and salvation?

But but but
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
6799 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:49 am to
Admittedly I haven’t even looked at this thread but how on earth would this be enforceable? It’s not like there’s a recording of what goes on so it’d be awfully hard to prove other than a potential criminals word.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
57853 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

we're working on it
just throw the constitution out the window, then
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram