- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cancer breakthroughs
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:07 pm to LemmyLives
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:07 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
Breast cancer research is more than twice what testicular research funding is.
As it should be. Testicular cancer is one of the most easily treated cancers there is.
0
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:09 pm to Doug_H
quote:
Some combo of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, DMSO, & Immune Mushroom blends are cited in nearly everything we have looked into as
Can you link some of the published double-blind placebo controlled (or vs. standard of care) trials on those treatments?
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:16 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
5x more prevalent than lymphoma? 2x pancreatic? Testicular was chosen as the example because it's the closest in funding, and it's way behind.
I think it might be closer to 4x Lymphoma and at least 5x Pancreatic. I think it’s well over 10x compared to testicular as well.
quote:
Lymphoma is between 70-80% survivable, breast cancer is 90%+ survivable. Pancreatic is at 13%. Ovarian at 50% if not detected early. Is it time for a rebalancing of priorities? It's at least something to consider.
There is a ton of research and trials ongoing for those diagnoses. Breast cancer gets the most funding because it affects the most people.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:31 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
Well, they can't continue to lose $2B/yr on a single drug and stay a functioning company..
Well they are.
That was 1 plant that made 1 drug. They have plenty of plants and plenty of drugs being made and billions and billions of revenue.
quote:
What is your solution, nationalize the precursor chemicals to the drug, invalidate the patents they have to pay for?
No i don't want the gov't involved.
i don't know what the solution is. I was just pointing out an interesting situation that i ran across just last year and how i can see why developing cures for diseases that result in less revenue for the company that does so can be a hairy situation. I'd like to believe that even the greediest of people still want a cure or better care for cancer patients, even if it means less profits for their company.
As someone else said, I don't think curing, or better treatment process for cancer and other terrible diseases, is something that will result in financial losses.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:39 pm to Keltic Tiger
VO2 should be the measure that all doctors reference in terms of overall health.
JAMA Article
There's so much evidence of this correlation that it's hard to believe it's not broadcast everywhere. Instead, we focus on diet and chemicals.
quote:
Cardiorespiratory fitness is inversely associated with long-term mortality with no observed upper limit of benefit. Extremely high aerobic fitness was associated with the greatest survival and was associated with benefit in older patients and those with hypertension. Cardiorespiratory fitness is a modifiable indicator of long-term mortality, and health care professionals should encourage patients to achieve and maintain high levels of fitness.
JAMA Article
There's so much evidence of this correlation that it's hard to believe it's not broadcast everywhere. Instead, we focus on diet and chemicals.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:40 pm to Giantkiller
The cancer hospitals are not curing cancer as i have seen it myself. They just want to chemo/ radiate everyone. There are better options but that does not make them $$$$ only chemo and radiation do. Many people could be cured with different methods such as B17, Nocotine patches, Ivermectin, Fendenozole, and 10 day fast, diet to meat only- so many different choices that they won't even bring up- because its not their policy. Truly its a crime against humanity with how they wont treat patients in a noninvasive way.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:47 pm to Giantkiller
A patient cured is a patient lost
A sad reality a big Pharma caring more about money and profits than people’s lives
A sad reality a big Pharma caring more about money and profits than people’s lives
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:48 pm to littlebird92
quote:
so sorry to hear that. You have all of my prayers and positive thoughts coming your way!
Thank you for the kind words. They have been trying to figure out why my triglycerides are running over 3000. So hope to get some answers.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:49 pm to Houtexlandscape
What’s your degree in?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:50 pm to Giantkiller
Cancer cells need two things to grow--glucose and glutamine. The latest research claims that cancer is a metabolic disease with a genetic susceptibility. Extremely low carb diets are recommended to slow or reverse cancer growth. Carnivore diets with fasting are most effective.
There's a body of anecdotal evidence supported by oncologists claiming that anti parasite drugs ivermectin and fenbendazole have been amazingly effective against some hard-to-treat late stage cancers. I've seen enough to find the claims credible.
Cancer treatments are about generating revenue. There's no incentive to cure cancer or to conduct studies on cheap alternative courses of action.
There's a body of anecdotal evidence supported by oncologists claiming that anti parasite drugs ivermectin and fenbendazole have been amazingly effective against some hard-to-treat late stage cancers. I've seen enough to find the claims credible.
Cancer treatments are about generating revenue. There's no incentive to cure cancer or to conduct studies on cheap alternative courses of action.
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:55 pm to Giantkiller
My best friend just got diagnosed with Stage 4 colon to liver. Has had all kinds of genetic testing done because they have a bunch of new drugs I guess that can REALLY help if the genetic profile comes back right. Here's hoping.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:57 pm to Cosmo
quote:
OT plant operators/medical experts will be here soon to tell you they arent looking for cures because no money in cures
oh sweet summer child
Posted on 2/11/25 at 4:04 pm to Jake88
quote:
Yes, along with diseases that would have responded to antibiotics and other therapies that were yet to be known.
Well thats the problem, if you factor in childhood/infant mortality, which definitely was a bigger problem before modern times, yeah its gonna make it seem like the average adult was dying at 42.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 4:05 pm to Houtexlandscape
quote:
The cancer hospitals are not curing cancer as i have seen it myself. They just want to chemo/ radiate everyone. There are better options but that does not make them $$$$ only chemo and radiation do. Many people could be cured with different methods such as B17, Nocotine patches, Ivermectin, Fendenozole, and 10 day fast, diet to meat only- so many different choices that they won't even bring up- because its not their policy. Truly its a crime against humanity with how they wont treat patients in a noninvasive way.
This will upset the vaxxbros, they are already downvoting you
Posted on 2/11/25 at 4:52 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:I know, but people are still living longer these days and will increase their chances of getting cancer. 50% of cases occur after the age of 65. Plus we have beter diagnostic capabilities and more people visit the doctor when something is an issue now compared to the past. We will see the same thing with dementia diagnoses.
Well thats the problem, if you factor in childhood/infant mortality, which definitely was a bigger problem before modern times, yeah its gonna make it seem like the average adult was dying at 42
Posted on 2/11/25 at 5:14 pm to ctiger69
quote:
Smoking causes cancer Alcohol causes cancer
This reminds me to go back and look at the comment Billy Bob’s character made in landman about countries smoking more but have less cancer. Something about what we eat in regards to additives and processed food versus what they eat. I meant to check on if it had any validity whatsoever and forgot.
I first have to find the exact quote, because I forgot his exact words.
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 2/11/25 at 5:44 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
and I hope that one area that gets more funding going forward it research into cancer and other diseases.
They’ve had millions upon millions of dollars for research over the last couple decades. That’s not the problem. They have had great results with multiple other alternative treatments yet they keep pumping people with poison that kills all your healthy cells. The revenue made off cancer treatments is up over $200 Billion in the last decade I believe and Big pharma is operating at a 90% profit margin. Let that sink in but yea they care about you
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:05 pm to dyslexiateechur
quote:
What’s your degree in?
What a sheep comment wow
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:15 pm to Howyouluhdat
That’s exactly what someone uneducated would say. 
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:29 pm to Houtexlandscape
You are extremely stupid.
GFY.
GFY.
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News