0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/29/26 at 11:52 am to Wayne Campbell
quote:
It's not worded in straightforward manner, but they're using "the 17 year old victim" as an identifier. Replace that with a name and it makes sense.
that's b/c we can't just report the simple facts. Everything has to be manipulated to fit what they want you to think instead of just stating the facts in a simple manner and letting you cum to your own conclusion.
quote:
Attorney John Burris, who represents the boy’s family, said Drott began grooming the teen in 2024 when he was 14 or 15 years old.
At the time, the boy — identified as John Doe in court papers — was serving two years in a Contra Costa County Juvenile Hall, where Drotts was assigned as his therapist.
“During the two years in which Doe was incarcerated at the juvenile Hall, Drotts abused her position as his therapist to establish an inappropriate emotional connection with Doe, ‘grooming’ him with the objective of sexual abuse,” court papers state.
After the boy was released on probation, Drotts continued to serve as his therapist through Contra Costa Health and allegedly had “unlawful sexual contact” with him, the court papers say.
He was clearly 17, or almost 17, when he decided to have sex with the sexy lady.
I like how it says "unlawful sexual contact". They could have said "unwanted" if he was actually raped, but unlawful works too.
This is very clearly a case of a mom finding out her little shithead son is banging the therapist and sees dollar signs. While illegal, I seriously doubt anything about these encounters wasn't 100% consensual from the 17 year old criminal. Wonder what the little angel did at 14 to get 2 years in juvenile detention?
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:07 pm to 3nOut
quote:
that being said, go be find a sugar daddy techbro that can actually pay for your lifestyle, not a 17 YO that barely knows how his dinkie works.
I’m not defending the 26yo. And I am not disagreeing with the points you are attempting to make.
But damn.
1. If you didn’t know how your dinkie worked at 17, that is a shameful admission.
2. The fact that you referred to it as a dinkie is probably an indicator of why you didn’t get to use your dinkie when you were 17.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:11 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
This is very clearly a case of a mom finding out her little shithead son is banging the therapist and sees dollar signs. While illegal, I seriously doubt anything about these encounters wasn't 100% consensual from the 17 year old criminal. Wonder what the little angel did at 14 to get 2 years in juvenile detention?
When the documentary comes out on this case on PornHub, we will all find out that the kid was in juvie because he was banging the underaged step sister.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:13 pm to stout
shes 26 now, hold old was she when she was "raping" the 17 yr old over 3 months
sounds like he sent dick pics to her with a blowie and a vibrator video in return
so, in conclusion - guilty, sure....however lets take the sensationalism down about 84 clicks....dude was already in juvie and wasnt "fundamentally shattered" as you are contesting for your payday
sounds like he sent dick pics to her with a blowie and a vibrator video in return
so, in conclusion - guilty, sure....however lets take the sensationalism down about 84 clicks....dude was already in juvie and wasnt "fundamentally shattered" as you are contesting for your payday
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:27 pm to HeadSlash
quote:
You can't rape the willing
take this same energy to the jared leto thread
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:29 pm to DomincDecoco
quote:
shes 26 now, hold old was she when she was "raping" the 17 yr old over 3 months
One of the alleged "raping" happened like 2 weeks ago, and started in April of this year.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 1:31 pm to TeddyPadillac
Women. They are everywhere too.
UGH!
UGH!
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:05 pm to Sunnyvale
define rape?
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:49 pm to 3nOut
quote:
it's evil
It's not evil. I lost my virginity at 15 to a 23 yo woman. I'm not saying it was moral or right or should be accepted, but it was not evil & it certainly was not rape.
We need to come up with a term for this gray area where the male "rape victim" wants it as much if not more than the perpetrator.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:39 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
define rape?
Statutory. Age of consent is 18 in CA.
And therapist/patient is usually a no-no.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 5:10 pm to AlterDWI
quote:
I lost my virginity at 15 to a 23 yo woman
Posted on 7/29/26 at 5:16 pm to stout
Why would he tell? 
Posted on 7/29/26 at 5:20 pm to Chazreinhold
You never saw this lady
I think that's most of the reason why she was messing around with a desperate virgin teenager.
Don't care. Had sex. I've privately thanked her every day for her loose morals.
I think that's most of the reason why she was messing around with a desperate virgin teenager.
Don't care. Had sex. I've privately thanked her every day for her loose morals.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 5:39 pm to stout
Not guilty. Call the next case.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 5:45 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:I once lived in Contra Costa County
therapist through Contra Costa Health
Could have been me. But im never lucky
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News