- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: British man sentenced to 18 years for using AI to make kiddie porn
Posted on 10/29/24 at 12:39 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 10/29/24 at 12:39 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
18 years for fake images while Muslims raping kids get suspended sentences.
That's England today.
Spot on, glad the dirt bag got busted and yet untold number children abused yet crickets.
0
Posted on 10/29/24 at 12:43 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
once this catches on I don't know if anyone can keep up with all the people that will do this, law enforcement won't be able to prosecute everyone with a computer and technology to do it
scary when you think anyone is fair game
One at a time. One at a time. Sort of like that kid that throws starfish back in the ocean. Will it make an overall difference? Maybe not... but it will for that one. And then that one. And so on.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 12:47 pm to Shexter
IMO, this should fall under the same category as sick fricks that use child like dolls to get off.
It's still pedophilia. Whether a "real" child is harmed or not is irrelevant to me. These are monsters. People always ask, "Where were the warning signs" when someone commits a heinous crime. Well. There it is. What more of a warning sign do you need than people getting off to child porn?
It's still pedophilia. Whether a "real" child is harmed or not is irrelevant to me. These are monsters. People always ask, "Where were the warning signs" when someone commits a heinous crime. Well. There it is. What more of a warning sign do you need than people getting off to child porn?
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:27 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
It deserves exactly the same penatly as real kiddie porn. There's no difference.
Say what?
There is 100% a difference. One is completely fake and computer generated, and the other uses real, live children and ruins them for life. There is an EXTREME difference between the two.
FWIW, I'm not arguing one way or the other on this...whatever this dude gets is fine with me. But to say that this and actually creating real child porn is ridiculous.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:36 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
But to say that this and actually creating real child porn is ridiculous.
No doubt that anybody who would do this has some real problems. But it just seems scary to set a precedent that you can be prosecuted for doing something entirely made-up on a computer with no real human victim (again, not the case in the OP story because he apparently started with real photos).
Totally different situation, but one that I find equally intriguing... There was a guy that got prosecuted for taking photos of kids in bathing suits at Blue Bayou or somewhere like that. If you can go there and sit on a chair and watch the exact same subject matter all day long, then why is it a crime (not a civil cause of action) to take photos of what is easily observable in a public place. Again, the guy obviously has issues but does anyone else have a problem with being criminally prosecuted for this?
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:43 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
There is 100% a difference. One is completely fake and computer generated, and the other uses real, live children and ruins them for life. There is an EXTREME difference between the two.
I'm speaking of the user, not the victim. To me, there's not difference in looking at kiddie porn and computer generated kiddie porn. IT'S STILL KIDDIE PORN.
And it's not a far cry from... wow, this looks so realistic. I wonder what the real thing looks like... to... this looking just ain't cutting if for me anymore.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:49 pm to Shexter
A lot of Japanese 'anime' studios would be a little nervous... just saying...
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:49 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
I'm speaking of the user, not the victim. To me, there's not difference in looking at kiddie porn and computer generated kiddie porn. IT'S STILL KIDDIE PORN.
Now that I sort of agree with.
But one is essentially victimless (in itself) and the other has massively traumatized (physically, emotionally, mentally) victims.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 2:04 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
But one is essentially victimless (in itself) and the other has massively traumatized (physically, emotionally, mentally) victims.
So kill one user quickly and the other slowly and more painfully.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 3:57 pm to TooFyeToFly
Ever heard of the case of Dr. Charles LaHaye in Ville Platte?
Posted on 10/29/24 at 5:00 pm to Shexter
The cucks running the UK will also toss you in county for calling islam a gutter religion on the interwebz.
Because they want to control your thinking. That’s why.
Because they want to control your thinking. That’s why.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 5:04 pm to Shexter
quote:
Not sure how I feel about this
Idk what the charges should be, but there's no fricking way this shite should be legal.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 5:06 pm to Shexter
fricking age-ists! It's not child porn, it's art for Minor Attracted Persons! This is why all the alphabet folks are frightened to come to Florida after the ReichsGovernor DeSantis passed that law.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 5:06 pm to billjamin
It's going to be an interesting case. Don't get me wrong, this guy is fricked in the head, but virtual pictures aren't real pictures. I hope it doesn't matter, as it does involve real children
This post was edited on 10/29/24 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 10/29/24 at 6:21 pm to Shexter
According to Dennis Prager, this is perfectly okay.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 6:32 pm to Shexter
quote:
He also admitted to encouraging the rape of a child
I think this is what got him. He used the images he created to foster others to do actual harm.
As others have mentioned it’s a slippery slope to grant the govt any control. Especially in the virtual world where there are typically no victims.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 6:42 pm to Shexter
What about novels like "Lolita" & "Under the Roofs of Paris"? Movies like "Taxi Driver"
Posted on 10/29/24 at 6:49 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Not sure how I feel about this
Let’s see if this helps:
“British man sentenced to 18 years for using AI to make kiddie porn from actual pictures of Cosmo’s kids”
Let’s add some context:
“The man lived next door to Cosmo, and would film his children playing outside- while he masturbated.”
Posted on 10/29/24 at 8:14 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Not sure how I feel about this As sick as this fricker is this seems like a better way for them to get their fix than actually exploiting real children Certainly shouldnt be same penalty as real kiddy porn
How in the hell did your statement get 55 upvotes?
The hell he shouldn’t get as harsh a punishment. Shouldn’t be any different. Honestly should be shot.
You think AI child porn isn’t as bad? How long before just looking at kiddie porn (AI or Real) isn’t enough for them any more and they go find the real thing. These people are sick and disgusting. Their is no rehabilitation for them. They are evil incarnate and should be removed from the earth.
I’m sure SlowFloPro will be along shortly to support your statement though.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 8:17 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Not sure how I feel about this
I know how I feel
Throw him in the river
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News