- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Border Patrol-involved shooting in Minneapolis; person shot was allegedly armed
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:55 pm to Foy
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:55 pm to Foy
quote:
I think I prefer the America where you can go around and film the federal government on a public street without getting wasted by some retard that was flipping burgers a month ago.
I prefer an America where a state governor doesn't tell people to resist normal law enforcement operations in order to distract from the massive fraud occurring in said state so law enforcement could operate without agitators impeding.
But here we are.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:56 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
But this wasn't a life and death decision because the protester was disarmed by another agent
Did you gather this from several watches of super slo mo video?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:57 pm to Foy
quote:
You can make all of these moronic arguments that you copy and paste from blue checks on Twitter all you want. I think you do probably realize deep down the optics from this one aren't going to be perceived by the general public the way your social media addled brain perceives them.
You’re defending people that are harassing federal agents that are following the law.
Simple as that.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:57 pm to lionward2014
It's only a spectacle in MSP because the locals are militantly anti Trump and thus anti-ICE. If Obama was in office, they'd being nothing at all.
We should not back off areas that resist. We should break the back of the resistance.
We should not back off areas that resist. We should break the back of the resistance.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:57 pm to Stidham8
quote:
You’re defending people that are harassing federal agents that are following the law.
Simple as that.
Doesn't really have anything to do with what I posted.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:58 pm to Foy
quote:
It's a waste of time to talk to these morons that have mortgaged their life to look at a self-affirming algorithm all day every day.
They told us Democrats would turn America into a show-your-papers society.
They told us Democrats would strip away the Second Amendment.
They told us Democrats would jail us for what we say.
They told us Democrats would drag us into more foreign wars.
They told us Democrats would cover up a child sex trafficking ring.
And then Republicans took power and decided to do all of it themselves.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:59 pm to Stidham8
The agent might have been the aggressor here
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:00 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I don’t consider it resisting.
Right, grabbing onto another person and staying on your feet instead of immediately going to the ground when told to is simply peaceful protest!
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:00 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I don’t consider it resisting. He just had a can of mace blasted up his nostrils. It’s icy.
He was maced because he was literally not listening. What part of that don’t you understand?
If you guys left the internet and got into the real world you’d maybe understand that if you are not 100% complying, you are a serious threat. End of story
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:01 pm to Street Hawk
quote:
They told us Democrats would turn America into a show-your-papers society.
They told us Democrats would strip away the Second Amendment.
They told us Democrats would jail us for what we say.
They told us Democrats would drag us into more foreign wars.
They told us Democrats would cover up a child sex trafficking ring.
And then Republicans took power and decided to do all of it themselves
Republican's are enforcing the law.
That's the most blue sky post I've ever seen. Holy shite.
If you don't like the law, change it. Oh wait you can't because you got your arse kicked.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:01 pm to lsupride87
quote:
This protester potentially impeding with officers doesn’t allow the agents to beat the frick out of him and kill him
You can't expect to interfere in an LEO operation that has nothing to do with you and expect not to get arrested. At some point, it turned into them trying to arrest him and he clearly resisted.
He was fighting and resisting 7 or 8 officers while carrying. Dude is the early leader for 2026 Darwin of the year winner
Vastly different than the Rittenhouse situation but keep trying liken them to being the same
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:01 pm to baldona
quote:
you’d maybe understand that if you are not 100% complying, you are a serious threat.
Except that is not what the law says.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:01 pm to Street Hawk
quote:Is that not what’s supposed to happen when we’re deporting illegals?
And then Republicans took power and decided to do all of it themselves.
I don’t get the comparison
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:02 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
might be murder.
Definitely not “murder” manslaughter would be the worst and I still doubt this is unjustified..
quote:
It is not clear that he ever gripped his legally concealed weapon.
One of these unverified videos looks as if he did and possibly even fired the first round. So I’ll hold my final judgement until all the facts come out.
I was right about the Brown chick and I’m willing to bet I’m right with this one as well
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:02 pm to Stidham8
quote:You have to be trolling
Right, grabbing onto another person and staying on your feet instead of immediately going to the ground when told to is simply peaceful protest!
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:02 pm to Stidham8
quote:
Right, grabbing onto another person and staying on your feet instead of immediately going to the ground when told to is simply peaceful protest!
In my eyes he resisted, but there is also context that should be added. He got blasted with pepper spray and has like 6 guys on him. Adreneline + harder to breathe + getting a smack down. Still dont see any real credible reason as to why they shot him. An arrest should be sufficient.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:03 pm to Foy
quote:
I think I prefer the America where you can go around and film the federal government on a public street without getting wasted by some retard that was flipping burgers a month ago.
You idiots always try to downplay the role of the other person as if he were simply filming when the videos clearly shows otherwise.
The point you replied to still stands. He would be alive had he stayed home and let LEO enforce immigration laws.
Why didn't all of you guys protest when Obama deported way more people than Trump has?
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:03 pm to baldona
quote:
He was maced because he was literally not listening. What part of that don’t you understand? If you guys left the internet and got into the real world you’d maybe understand that if you are not 100% complying, you are a serious threat. End of story
They’re incapable of rational thought even when the video shows the evidence.
It’s all as if a guy who brought a loaded gun with two extra magazines was pure as the driven snow.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 5:04 pm to stout
quote:
You idiots always try to downplay the role of the other person as if he were simply filming when the videos clearly shows otherwise.
You're right! He also had his hand up after being maced and tried to help a woman up off the ground
Popular
Back to top



0







