Started By
Message

re: BLM Supporter who threatened to massacre 16 students allowed back on campus

Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:21 am to
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:21 am to
quote:

understand how all this internet board stuff works and how many really stupid things are posted/said and how everyone tries to be inflammatory, but you are just above and beyond an a-hole.

Based on your post history, If calling out racism and inaccurate info makes me an a-hole in your eyes, then that's a plus.
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 9:22 am
Posted by NoNameTiger
Mandeville, LA
Member since Nov 2015
2054 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:23 am to
quote:

a history of violence,


Really?

You have to have a history of violence for a threat to be taken seriously?

Did the gunmen in all the other mass shootings have histories of violence?

I have no history of violent behavior, so based on your criteria I can make detailed threats to murder people with no consequences????
Posted by GaryMyMan
Shreveport
Member since May 2007
13499 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:25 am to
Is there any other source for this other than infowars? I mean, come on.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
159446 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:28 am to
quote:

white devils


I'm sick of this narrative. In the past two months I've found two little old black ladies on the side of the street that were run out of gas.

I have no idea how many black men passed them by but I do know that it was a white man that did stop and help them both and even gave one of them free gas.

As a side note, one was especially thankful and the other made me feel like she deserved my help and no thanks was needed. I didn't care either way because I felt good about helping.

This white devil isn't going to change and won't stop helping people because BLM idiots exist though.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22547 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Gelron


Could you define this for me or point me to the thread page that started this? I'm interested to see if I will use it or not. Thanks.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:35 am to
God help the kids on that campus. No shot I'd go to any class without a pistol and I'd make sure to be seated were I could see him before he sees me though the door
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:38 am to
quote:


You have to have a history of violence for a threat to be taken seriously?


No. But it is among a number of considerations.

quote:

I have no history of violent behavior, so based on your criteria I can make detailed threats to murder people with no consequences????


The guy in question is facing a felony charge as a matter of fact, but theoretically, yes, you can make violent threats of varying detail and not end up being convicted of a crime.

You guys get hard of understanding when you're emotional.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12785 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:40 am to
Have they let the white guys out of jail yet for their threats at Missouri?
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14616 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:41 am to
quote:

A ‘Black Lives Matter’ supporter who threatened to massacre 16 white students as part of a revenge attack for the shooting of Chicago teen Laquan McDonald has been allowed to return to campus by a federal judge.


And there you have it. Key reason why elections matter. Is there any doubt if it was a white guy threatening to kill 16 blacks, that he would have never ever been allowed back on campus?
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135036 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:41 am to
Drank started a thread about the shooting too late

People started spelling out Germans one letter at a time. Except it came out

G

E

L

R

O

N

S psychtiger exclaimed GELRONS

I said it should be the OT original Answer to Germans.

Posted by tWatsonTiger
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
534 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:42 am to
Wow!
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
22340 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:42 am to
Yet Obama says it's all about the guns, not the individuals.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Is there any other source for this other than infowars? I mean, come on.
So the "whole" story is that apparently he's essentially under house arrest pending trial, but will be allowed to travel to and from class as a condition of his release. That doesn't mean the school will let him back on campus.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
22340 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:47 am to
Yet there was a national uproar over another "student" and I use the word lightly having his feelings hurt by seeing a small Rebel flag on a computer. That person obviously meant serious harm, right NavyTiger?
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22547 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:48 am to
I like it. I will support.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:58 am to
quote:

If calling out racism and inaccurate info makes me an a-hole in your eyes, then that's a plus.


1) You are not calling out racism. You are defending the racism that justifies the unequal treatment of two individuals by the justice system based on their race.

You are in fact defending racist practices.

2) the whole argument that this threat was not serious because this guy did not have access to a weapon bellies the left's argument for gun control; ie, that guns are everywhere and so easy to obtain that we need legislation regulating their availability.

Make up your mind Leftists....
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 10:09 am to
quote:

And there you have it. Key reason why elections matter. Is there any doubt if it was a white guy threatening to kill 16 blacks, that he would have never ever been allowed back on campus?

Except that several and most who have threatened to kill Obama did not do jail time. Truth. But does not fit the narrative of many here. Please downvote this truth.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139229 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Except that several and most who have threatened to kill Obama did not do jail time. Truth. But does not fit the narrative of many here. Please downvote this truth.

No one is talking about jail time, or even about Obama so get outta here with that bullshite.







Oh, and have a downvote too
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70178 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 10:12 am to
quote:

You are in fact defending racist practices.


he always does...he also always states his biggest problem is racism so he defends black people...the ones that have a higher percentage of racists
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 12/3/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

1) You are not calling out racism. You are defending the racism that justifies the unequal treatment of two individuals by the justice system based on their race. You are in fact defending racist practices. 2) the whole argument that this threat was not serious because this guy did not have access to a weapon bellies the left's argument for gun control; ie, that guns are everywhere and so easy to obtain that we need legislation regulating their availability.


1. Your statement of unequal treatment in favor of blacks is an inaccurate narrative unsupported by facts.
2. Not a leftist. Not in favor of gun control one bit.
3. You are barking up the wrong tree.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram