- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM Supporter who threatened to massacre 16 students allowed back on campus
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:29 am to StringedInstruments
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:29 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
Do you have a link for this?
quote:
Hunter Park, 19, was arrested early Wednesday morning, hours after posting threats on Yik Yak, a social media platform that allows its users to keep their identities private. Park has been charged with a Class C felony of making a terrorist threat.
Park’s appeal for bond was denied Thursday at the Boone County Courthouse. Park’s parents and two brothers were present at the hearing.
Park’s attorney, Jeffrey Hilbrenner, argued that based on Park's age and absence of criminal history, Park’s bond should be set at $10,000. He said he and Park understood the serious nature of the threats and charges.
quote:
Hilbrenner claimed that Park had no real capability of carrying out his threats, as the police did not find any weapons.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 7:31 am
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:31 am to Navytiger74
quote:Daughter of a family I know wrote something about a bomb on the girls bathroom wall Mandeville High School (this is 8-10 yrs ago). She was arrested, expelled, homeland security was brought in etc. I know the dad and he told me the investigation scope was incredible. She had some very strenuous probation terms and was never allowed near that school again, rightfully so. Point being, this is how this a-hole should have been handled as well.
It's clear it wasn't a serious threat, but it was a lethal threat that cost the school, the city, the state, and federal authorities 100s of thousands of dollars...not to mention the terror and inconvenience to the students, faculty, staff, and their families.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:35 am to StringedInstruments
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:35 am to nes2010
quote:
Hunter Park, 19, was arrested early Wednesday morning, hours after posting threats on Yik Yak, a social media platform that allows its users to keep their identities private. Park has been charged with a Class C felony of making a terrorist threat.
Park’s appeal for bond was denied Thursday at the Boone County Courthouse. Park’s parents and two brothers were present at the hearing.
Park’s attorney, Jeffrey Hilbrenner, argued that based on Park's age and absence of criminal history, Park’s bond should be set at $10,000. He said he and Park understood the serious nature of the threats and charges.
Hilbrenner claimed that Park had no real capability of carrying out his threats, as the police did not find any weapons.
Don't know all the details, but even all things being equal, those are different jurisdictions. I can find similarly disparate outcomes for otherwise similar cases by county, state, and federal jurisdictions all over the country.
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 7:38 am
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:37 am to trom83
frick that piece of shite. He needs to disappear under questionable circumstances
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:39 am to Navytiger74
The feds may not have been able to hold him if he had yet to begin to carry out his plan. The threat could have been step one or two.
My point is that the seriousness of the threat is a matter of the true intentions of the guy. We can go by what he's said or we can go by a judge's decision and make assumptions based on that decision which could include, as you think, limited physical evidence. Which is very likely. And I would agree. But I don't believe that means this is a clear cut case of someone making an empty threat. And that's it. Nothing else too it. While it may be more likely at this point, im not in his head and neither is anyone else. So I remain skeptical.
My point is that the seriousness of the threat is a matter of the true intentions of the guy. We can go by what he's said or we can go by a judge's decision and make assumptions based on that decision which could include, as you think, limited physical evidence. Which is very likely. And I would agree. But I don't believe that means this is a clear cut case of someone making an empty threat. And that's it. Nothing else too it. While it may be more likely at this point, im not in his head and neither is anyone else. So I remain skeptical.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:41 am to Navytiger74
But your argument hinges on him being released... So that's as good an argument against yourself in that it's not "clear" this was an empty threat.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:54 am to ell_13
quote:Law enforcement can at least temporarily hold suspects in nearly any stage of an identifiable plot if it's deemed credible.
The feds may not have been able to hold him if he had yet to begin to carry out his plan.
quote:
My point is that the seriousness of the threat is a matter of the true intentions of the guy. We can go by what he's said or we can go by a judge's decision and make assumptions based on that decision which could include, as you think, limited physical evidence. Which is very likely. And I would agree. But I don't believe that means this is a clear cut case of someone making an empty threat. And that's it. Nothing else too it. While it may be more likely at this point, im not in his head and neither is anyone else. So I remain skeptical.
That's all fair. But you'd be surprised how many deadly threats are communicated in this country every day--boyfriends against girlfriends, employees against employers, threats against the first family and other public figures and celebrities, (more rare) bomb threats phoned into schools and other public venues. Authorities have metrics to assess whether or not it's something credible (and, if credible, imminent) or if it's a prank or somebody saying crazy shite in a rage or just blowing off steam. They're right most of the time. When they're not, people die. It wouldn't make sense to give a 5 years to every single person who's ever said "I'm going to kill that bastard next time I see him." Obviously his threat was more elaborate, but I imagine they looked into his background, ran forensics on his computer, phone, social media accounts, and determined that he was either blowing off steam or looking for attention. I wonder if he's undergone a formal psychological evaluation yet.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:58 am to trom83
I think we are all missing a key point here.
The University of Chicago is supposed to be a relatively prestigious school, is it not?
Look at how many grammatical errors the 21 yr old produced.
The University of Chicago is supposed to be a relatively prestigious school, is it not?
Look at how many grammatical errors the 21 yr old produced.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:58 am to trom83
White kids are getting tossed from school for fake rapes, while black kids get the red carpet treatment after threatening to kill whitey. 
Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:09 am to Black n Gold
quote:
White kids are getting tossed from school for fake rapes, while black kids get the red carpet treatment after threatening
Whiteys getting medals for threatening to assassinate the president
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 9:18 am
Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:12 am to ell_13
quote:
But your argument hinges on him being released... So that's as good an argument against yourself in that it's not "clear" this was an empty threat.
I wrote "even all things being equal [in circumstance]," legal procedures, customs, etc vary by jurisdiction. So that magistrate in Missouri chose to hold a kid for what is not a serious threat (assuming it's similar to the one made by the kid in Chicago). The judge in Chicago chose not to.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:20 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
LSUTANGERINE
I understand how all this internet board stuff works and how many really stupid things are posted/said and how everyone tries to be inflammatory, but you are just above and beyond an a-hole.
You should just leave and not come back.
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 8:21 am
Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:29 am to fr33manator
quote:
So let me get this straight.
White kid makes vague "threats" in the line of "black people might not want to go to school tomorrow." On an anonymous message board
Gets tracked down, arrested and charged with terrorism.
Black kid makes clear, detailed threats, including how many white people he will shoot using what, and is expressly racist, and gets a slap on the wrist.

Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:29 am to trom83
It will be the gun's (or "society's") fault when this guy flips the switch and starts mowing down innocent people.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:35 am to Oates Mustache
quote:
How easy could he have armed himself?
With about 3 grand I could walk into the local Academy Sports and buy an AR-15 and two large caliber handguns. No one could stop me. He could have acquired those weapons in 10 minutes if he wanted to.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 8:41 am to TheAlmightySmash
quote:Do you live in Chicago? Did you have 3 grand lying around as a college student?
With about 3 grand I could walk into the local Academy Sports and buy an AR-15 and two large caliber handguns. No one could stop me. He could have acquired those weapons in 10 minutes if he wanted to.
I'm not saying he couldn't have acquired weapons were he determined, but that's a pretty silly answer.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:08 am to CherryGarciaMan
Two different schools. The idiot went to University of Illinois, Chicago. He was threatening the University of Chicago, which is tied for #4 with Stanford and Columbia in the 2016 USN rankings.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 9:20 am to trom83
quote:
University of Chicago
Not surprised in the least. Disgusted, but not surprised
Popular
Back to top


1








