- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Black Range Rover hits and kills man on Ben Hur Rd, then leaves the scene.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:40 am to lsupride87
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:40 am to lsupride87
quote:
Stallworth was ultimately charged with vehicular Manslaughter I believe
Not sure. He only did 30 days though so I’m guessing if he was, it got dropped down
0
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:40 am to Schmelly
quote:Why did that make you mad?
Are you fricking serious? Man gtfo
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:40 am to lsupride87
quote:
Stallworth was ultimately charged with vehicular Manslaughter I believe
Likely had to do with the DA or family asking them to reduce charges for money or something along those lines.
That is to say, if you commit vehicular homicide in somewhere like St Tammany you are fricked.
He may well get off lightly but it will be because of our judiciary in the 19th or money
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:41 am to lsupride87
No Jude and if he was over .08 then the kid is not a fault.. that’s what the poster was talking about
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:41 am to Bubble Gum
quote:
No Jude and if he was over .08 then the kid is not a fault.. that’s what the poster was talking about
What? If who was over .08? Jude?
No dude
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:42 am to lsupride87
quote:
Why did that make you mad?
Cause who gives a flying frick about this dude’s football prospects right now?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:43 am to Proximo
Proximo you seem to be making this case a little to open and shut
It seems known the victim did not use a crosswalk
If he alas also considered intoxicated by his BAC, that is a lot working against the case that the driver was at fault for the accident. Now the hit and run seems open and shut
It seems known the victim did not use a crosswalk
If he alas also considered intoxicated by his BAC, that is a lot working against the case that the driver was at fault for the accident. Now the hit and run seems open and shut
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:44 am to Proximo
quote:
You're low IQ and need to stop posting
Low IQ??? what I’m saying is the most likely outcome… y’all trippin if you think this kid gets a long prison sentence…
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
If he alas also considered intoxicated by his BAC, that is a lot working against the case that the driver was at fault for the accident.
Where there is criminal negligence on the part of the person who committed the killing, it does not matter whether the deceased was jaywalking or if the deceased was negligent in some way.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:49 am to Schmelly
quote:
Oh really? Well he should be fricked
How do you figure this? BAC of the driver will not play a part in this at all, because it's impossible to determine what his BAC was at the time of the accident.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:50 am to Proximo
quote:
Are you aware of the theory of spoliation of evidence? Lol
Stop it … none of this going come up in this case… you’ve been wrong on all your points so far
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:51 am to Schmelly
quote:
They took Jude’s blood samples and if he was drunk then they are pretty much screwed..
Really, what is the legal limit for walking?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:52 am to Proximo
quote:
Where there is criminal negligence on the part of the person who committed the killing, it does not matter whether the deceased was jaywalking or if the deceased was negligent in some way.
You have no idea what the hell you are talking about
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:56 am to Epic Cajun
It will play a part because he will be charged with obstruction of justice
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:57 am to Proximo
quote:
It will play a part because he will be charged with obstruction of justice
How can you possibly prove what it was at the time of the accident? There's no proof that was there any sort of evidence to destroy.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 12:00 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
How can you possibly prove what it was at the time of the accident? There's no proof that was there any sort of evidence to destroy.
Because it isn’t the first and won’t be the last. Just because they don’t have proof doesn’t mean it won’t be accounted for, ppl interviewed, etc.
Dude killed someone and left. He probably didn’t know and was scared and drove off. Ya I’m assuming, but again, it happens a lot.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 12:01 pm to Epic Cajun
Unless they have some receipts from a bar or surveillance footage of the driver drinking before, how could an attorney argue that he fled because he was drunk?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 12:02 pm to Ingeniero
It’s common sense, hate to say it, but Occam’s razor. Easy assumption and it will be investigated.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 12:03 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Unless they have some receipts from a bar or surveillance footage of the driver drinking before, how could an attorney argue that he fled because he was drunk?
Even if you have that, you still can't prove what his BAC was at the time of the accident. It's not illegal to drink and then drive. It's illegal to operate a vehicle with a BAC >.08.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 12:04 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
It’s common sense, hate to say it, but Occam’s razor. Easy assumption and it will be investigated.
Page 10 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News