Started By
Message

re: Black Range Rover hits and kills man on Ben Hur Rd, then leaves the scene.

Posted on 10/13/22 at 11:47 pm to
Posted by LSUCOCK
Member since Jun 2012
690 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 11:47 pm to
I'm sorry but if you're driving at night how tf you know this guy is about to jump out in front of you? 90 percent victims fault.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10145 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 2:46 am to
quote:

In that part of town on a Saturday night it sounds more like a white sorority girl from LSU.


Well we see what happens when they stop for a train. Certainly shouldn't stop for 2 guys in the road.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14471 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 6:59 am to
So this kid said he had no idea he hit Jude until the next morning when he saw it somewhere. Got a hard time believing this. I heard about it at about 8:30 the next morning through friends. I spent the next 7-8 hours checking the OT waiting for some kinda info. But I didn’t hear anything about a black RR until this thread& the WAFB articla came out at around 4:00pm. If I knew what happened and couldn’t find any media info about it, and, of all places, not even the OT knew about it until 4:00…how the hell did he?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36030 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 7:26 am to
quote:

So this kid said he had no idea he hit Jude until the next morning when he saw it somewhere


I was thinking the same thing
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36030 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 7:26 am to
quote:

I'm sorry but if you're driving at night how tf you know this guy is about to jump out in front of you? 90 percent victims fault.


But you don’t leave the scene.
Posted by BilbeauTBaggins
probably stuck in traffic
Member since May 2021
4392 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Witnesses in the car would know if Brister knew he hit a person.


This kid likely has friends in high places. 100% his attorney has talked to all the kids to keep their mouths shut until they come up with a plan to talk to police/testify. I would find the people who aren't friends with the driver to be more credible given that they have no stake in the relationship with Brister.

Also, you 100% know you ran over a person if you hit them, unless you were shitfaced and blackout.
Posted by Sterling Archer
Austin
Member since Aug 2012
7312 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Drunk kid hits pedestrian Shits his pants and leaves scene Go to bed to sleep it off Calls rich dad in morning Dad calls rich lawyer Driver comes forward saying he did it but never saw person and thought it was a deer Done


WOW you fricking called it
Posted by pizota13
Addis, La
Member since Feb 2013
185 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:15 am to
Since when does one determine the manner in which they will turn themselves in?
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24288 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I'm sorry but if you're driving at night how tf you know this guy is about to jump out in front of you? 90 percent victims fault


You are correct if it is just a hit. He ran so he is fooked.
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
4596 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Isn’t it a bit ironic the victim hit and killed a guy on a bike 24 years ago?

Would like to hear more about this.
Posted by TitleistProV1X
Member since Nov 2015
3511 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Would like to hear more about this

Same. Not that this would put any fault on the victim but would be pretty crazy
Posted by MonroeTigerstripes
Member since Jul 2016
536 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 10:08 am to
Story I was told (from a friend who lives in Dville) was that when Jude was 21, he hit and killed a homeless man walking on the side of the road in donaldsonville. This was pre-cell phone times, so he drove home and told his dad. Jude and his dad called for help and drove back to the scene. I was also told jude was pretty depressed about it for a long time. Like I said, this is all second hand info but it’s not some big secret. Very ironic though and sad all around
Posted by Gorilla Ball
Member since Feb 2006
11673 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 10:19 am to
Agreed
Posted by PappaSwolio
tGeneral’s Army
Member since Sep 2022
901 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 10:40 am to
Seeing that the kid was not driving an 18 wheeler, I find it impossible to not know you hit someone. Unless he was impaired out of his mind.

Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
40237 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 10:43 am to
On Facebook from Telesssie Baylor FWIW

“So the lady is mixing a little truth with a whole lot of lies
Yes Drew (I think she means Jude)
did run over man yes Jude did keep on going and go to work it was early in the morning Jude was on his way to work not drag racing
The man was passed out laying in the roadway Jude hit him and thought it was a dead animal it was laying in the road
What’s the news came out that a man laying in the roadway had got hit by a car and killed Jude turned himself in because he realized at that location that’s where he thought he hit the animal
The toxicology report came back on the guy and he was he had so many drugs and so much alcohol in your system did they drop the case they didn’t charge Jude with anything”

Crazy how similar the incidents were
Posted by kingfish225
Member since Dec 2013
520 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 11:18 am to
Absolutely NOT frick this. You’re now going to blame the person that let them cross and the victim. People need to be patient and stop driving around vehicles in front of them the second there is a wait. This shite happens all the time and this time sadly someone was killed.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
5707 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Not sure exactly the Florida statute but in Louisiana, you commit vehicular homicide if you hit and kill someone with a BAC over .08 whether you intended it or not. Fault doesn't matter on the part of the deceased.


I was looking the law (but not on Louisiana’s website for original version), and it looked like at some point after 2006 the state tacked on “…and such condition was a contributing factor to the killing” to the end of Section A which is right before listing the conditions - DUI and other impairment clauses.
quote:

RS 14:32.1 - Vehicular homicide
A. Vehicular homicide is the killing of a human being caused proximately or caused directly by an offender engaged in the operation of, or in actual physical control of, any motor vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other means of conveyance, whether or not the offender had the intent to cause death or great bodily harm, whenever any of the following conditions exists and such condition was a contributing factor to the killing


If this was actually added (other site may be off with 2006 version) was it added to at least consider situations where other driver or pedestrian killed might have been completely in the wrong?



Posted by TitleistProV1X
Member since Nov 2015
3511 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Absolutely NOT frick this. You’re now going to blame the person that let them cross and the victim. People need to be patient and stop driving around vehicles in front of them the second there is a wait. This shite happens all the time and this time sadly someone was killed.

Is it unreasonable to blame all parties involved? If the kid went around the car at a legal spot then there’s really no fault there outside of not stopping to help, although safe to say the kid couldn’t have done anything to actually help save his life. If the victim goes to a crosswalk to cross then this never happens. If the driver that stopped in the middle of the road at a non pedestrian crosswalk didn’t stop and kept going then this never happens. It’s a horrible accident but all parties could’ve done something slightly different and everyone would’ve went on about their night
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
5707 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Absolutely NOT frick this. You’re now going to blame the person that let them cross and the victim. People need to be patient and stop driving around vehicles in front of them the second there is a wait. This shite happens all the time and this time sadly someone was killed.



Has a more specific location on Ben Hur and direction of vehicle been officially reported by police (if mentioned in discussion I missed it)?

There is small section of Ben Hur close to Burbank that has multiple lanes. Going away from Burbank it’s 2 lanes until past creek Centre. Going towards Burbank past creek Centre (& then past oncoming turn lane into apartments) a right turn only lane and a left turn lane open up on sides of the single lane that can turn left or continue straight into apartment complex entrance. If it took place where there are multiple lanes and it’s not well lit like others have mentioned not seeing people start to cross and just seeing a car going slow or stopping for apparently no reason it’s normal for cars to go around. That’s usually the point of additional lanes.

Where it’s 2 lanes all I see is double yellow lines making passing illegal, but my Map app is stuck in Apple’s 3D faux satellite view when that view is available and can’t see more recent satellite view on device I am using right now. If changes have made it legal to pass a single car in some spots where it’s 2 lane and that’s also where accident happened I also think it would be fairly common to do so if a car is going to slow or seemingly stopping out of the blue while not seeing anything else oncoming or crossing (again based on legality, how well lit area is, and other visibility factors).


Very often people flashing lights or waving people or cars to cross in front aren’t paying attention to other traffic or lanes and may be blocking the person’s view of that traffic (or flashing lights at night may cause temp vision spots or temp restrict view as well). Without a specific regulation stating to not do it I doubt a flashing car can be held criminally at fault outside of them causing accident behind them by blocking traffic at the blue, but it will the fault of the car or person crossing in front (jaywalking) if they hit or get hit by a car that is legally passing in a additional lane or other scenario where passing is legal. You can’t use the excuse a car kept waving for me to cross in front of it. Trust me my wife tried…

Edit: The Range Rover driver is in the wrong for leaving the scene. That is obvious. Whether he (or maybe someone for sure not drinking would be better example) would have been at fault before fleeing just for where and how he passed the car stopped before hitting victim is not as clear due to limited details released or that I have read.
This post was edited on 10/15/22 at 4:42 pm
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37327 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 4:21 pm to
I am surprised we have not seen photos of the Range Rover’s damage published yet.
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 19Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram