re: Bike lane controversy on Glenmore Ave in BR

quote:

---

Which is why removing these will not inconvenience cyclists very much, if at all.

---

it just sets a bad precedent in the eyes of cyclists

quote:

---

willing to be delayed slightly with cyclists mixing with motorists.

---

I agree the lane is a bad idea. But, I think we paint cyclists as whiners while basically giving anyone else free reign to complain about them. I don't think motorists will all of a sudden not care that bikes are in the road. There will be a willingness for all of about ten minutes until they forget this whole issue. Some people just completely don't want to have to deal with bikes and you won't change that opinion.

quote:

---

iving up the lane would set a bad precedent if other residents or business owners decided to challenge a bike lane later on

---

I think keeping the lane against the wishes of the residents would definitely set cyclists back in Baton Rouge and severely cripple the city's ability to add lanes in residential areas in the future.

These bad apples in the cycling community already make cyclists look unreasonable and childish. This needs to go away. I know you can't un-explode a bomb but that's kind of what needs to happen.

quote:

---

giving up the lane would set a bad precedent if other residents or business owners decided to challenge a bike lane later on

so yes, it is certainly political

I don't think it has anything to do with arrogance though

---

At this point, refusing to give up a lane that isn't needed is going to set the cycling community up for more obstacles moving forward.

Let the little fish go to catch the big one. The ultimate goal is a more bike-friendly city, not forcing bike lanes on a street where no one wants them and where they aren't needed.....and pissing everyone off in the process.

Should Cyclists Have to Stop at Stop Signs?


LINK


An interesting article about having cyclists stop at stop signs.

quote:

---

But many argued that the cyclists should just be happy to have the lane with cars parked in it and that it's ridiculous that they would think that the cars would be a problem.

---

That sounds like a poor attempt at reaching a compromise.

The lane needs to be removed. The cyclists would loose very little and the residents would gain tremendously. I agree that the goal should be a bike-friendly city. This is the wrong battle to pick to reach that goal.

The cycling community and the city of Baton Rouge should not allow a few assholes on bikes to ruin it for everyone. Demanding that unnecessary bike lanes stay while the city is considering removing lanes for motorists on Government is a huge mistake.

quote:

---

it just sets a bad precedent in the eyes of cyclists

---

they should have thought a bit about perception before they decided to act like children

quote:

---

they should have thought a bit about perception before they decided to act like children

---

I agree that the cycling community already suffered a serious blow to their image. They look unreasonable by demanding a bike lane where it isn't necessary, and completely unsympathetic to the concerns of residents and motorists.

It's foolish to risk turning the public against bicycle riders in a city that's only now starting to contemplate real investments in the infrastructure to support cyclists.

Drove next to a hefty fella on his bike huffing and puffing up the little bridge on Essen before you turn onto Jefferson. There's no bike lane so he wobbled back and forth as he stuggled to get up that bridge, causing myself and anyone else who passed him to move over in fear of hitting him.

Of course some moved over too much which caused the other vehicles driving the opposite direction to shift quickly. Basically there were about 5 different scenarios for an accident to happen, all because one person wanted to ride a bike on Essen Ln.

quote:

---

I think this whole argument is overplayed. I don't think people are affected anymore from cyclists messing up at stop signs than cars

---

The reality is that stop signs and cross walks are there for a reason. Blowing through them is against the law and may expose pedestrians, motorists, and cyclists to unseen and unnecessary danger.

Blowing a stop sign actually has a higher penalty (if actually enforced) than parking in a bike lane. Cyclists should not downplay the dangers of blowing through a stop sign...which is habitual practice for many.

quote:

---

Why not leave the lane and allow cars to park and just have the bikes go around the cars when they are parked. It can't be that hard

---

That might have been a solution before the entire city found out about it in the media. Keeping the lane without parking enforcement would invite people to park in bike lanes all over town.

The only solution now is to remove the unnecessary lane. A minor inconvenience for motorists and cyclists in sharing a lane would mean very happy residents in a city where cyclists are fighting for widespread acceptance and for lanes on routes where they are truly needed.

If you want Baton Rouge citizens to be more bike friendly, then be reasonable about removing unnecessary bike lanes.

quote:

---

Now, cyclist who cut off a car as if they are always the right of way are assholes, but that doesn't happen as often as people make it seem

---

It happens to me almost weekly. Given the relatively small amount of bikes on the road, that's pretty bad.

I think the worst cyclists typically bike way more frequently than those who actually know what they are doing. I think it's that type that were unwise in choosing this battle on Glenmore....not the reasonable people who are our there to stay healthy.