Started By
Message

re: Baton Rouge City Parish Salaries

Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112518 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

There is that word fraud again


The parish's PTO accrual/rollover system was given as a benefit in the place of monetary compensation. It was presented in the manner of, "what we can give you in salary, we will give you in retirement and benefits".

Not sure how the rollover and accrual is an issue and or a problem.

If for example, I am given 10 days off a year and I work 10 years, then that's 100 days off that my employer has given me as a benefit over the course of my employment.

How is taking 10 days off every year any different or better than me waiting 5 years and then taking 50 days off and then waiting another 5 years an taking the remaining 50 days off. At the end of 10 years, 100 days were wwre given my the employer and 100 days off were taken by the employer.

If leave can be taken and it doesn't create manpower or staffin issues, how is it a problem?
Explain to me how he was able to use 520 hours of vacation two years in a row? That is a shitty system no matter how you want to slice it
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88368 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:05 pm to
I have already explained it in this very thread. I'm not going to keep restarting the same thing since some posters are refusing to acknowledge or ignoring it when posted
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 12:06 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112518 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

SPEEDY
So if he pulls of 2,600 hours of OT in 2015 we can assume fraud correct? Because he wont have those vacation hours to use this year.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106013 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Lea Anne Batson
Parish Attorney



Was a hottie at LSU

quote:

$78908


Not bad for a part time gig.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88368 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:09 pm to
If all an officer can accrue is vacation, then yes.

This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 5:36 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79742 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Explain to me how he was able to use 520 hours of vacation two years in a row?


how much vacation does he get?
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27993 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

So if he pulls of 2,600 hours of OT in 2015 we can assume fraud correct? Because he wont have those vacation hours to use this year.


He's not working the hours so stop trying to work the logistics out with Speedy. It's painfully obvious to anyone who doesn't have an agenda. It's worth noting that all of his boys on the DWI task force are right up there with him in terms of hours of OT worked. These clowns are all in on it. They are defrauding the federal government but where it really hurts the city is the way their retirement calculations are structured.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79742 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

He's not working the hours so stop trying to work the logistics out with Speedy.


Another person with definitive proof.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88368 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

He's not working the hours so stop trying to work the logistics out with Speedy. It's painfully obvious to anyone who doesn't have an agenda.



Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27993 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Another person with definitive proof.




I just go by what other BRPD officers tell me goes on with this OT and "extra duty".
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79742 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

just go by what other BRPD officers tell me goes on with this OT and "extra duty".



I believe it is just skirting inside the rules. Saying it is impossible to do is another story. That is all I have maintained.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76131 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Lea Anne Batson
Parish Attorney
Was a hottie at LSU



Possibly....

Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91545 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

think they make $40 hr doing road escorts of oversize loads and what not..... they can make nice extra money doing that.



Pretty sure they make extra on most security detail, like football games.
Posted by LSUAfro
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
12775 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Baton Rouge City Police Officer Cory Reech
Gross Salary: $195,737

quote:

About a year after
City Court Judge Yvette Alexander ruled that the Baton Rouge Police Department conducted an unconstitutional DWI checkpoint, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeal overturned her decision.

The main issue is whether Lt. Cory Reech, BRPD’s DWI Task Force commander, violated guidelines set by the Louisiana Supreme Court by both deciding how the checkpoint would be run and working as a field officer at the checkpoint — two duties the high court ruled in 2000 should fall to separate people.

quote:

Cliff Ivey, a former city police officer who had challenged the checkpoint, argued that Reech did not fit the qualifications of “supervisory” set forth by the high court’s ruling because his regular duties include writing tickets and patrolling the city to enforce traffic laws.


“He, in fact, is the officer in the field whose discretion that decision was trying to limit,” Ivey said Friday in an interview

quote:

Reech testified in City Court that as a “logistics officer” at the checkpoint, he helped set up cones and a road sign clearly identifying the checkpoint but that any discretionary decisions were left to the “checkpoint supervisor,” Cpl. Mickey Duncan.

Both officers are part of a four-member DWI task force headed by Reech.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36631 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

oth officers are part of a four-member DWI task force headed by Reech.



And all four members make more OT hours than regular
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79742 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

And all four members make more OT hours than regular


I don't get where this is headed
Posted by absolute692
US of A, MFer
Member since Feb 2007
4004 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:41 pm to
Obviously the DWI task force get the most OT, it will add up pretty quick.

They work their normal 40 hours a week looking for DWI's. Sometimes that last arrest is when they are just supposed to be getting off, or "on the way home". Well now they just got another few hours added by going through the whole process of a DWI arrest.

Then they have weekly or bi-weekly meetings before their shifts start, they are going to those meetings for free.

Then, they have to spend 8 hours a few days a week at court, in case they get called in to the court room. If you go to the 3rd floor of city court on a Wednesday, you will see the entire DWI task force sitting outside the courtroom talking shooting the shite.

Throw in some extra detail on an off day and they can easily work 100+ hours in one week, which offsets the weeks they don't work as much.

And the federal grants are paying the officers overtime, so it's not hurting the city or the taxpayers. That is until they retire, and those 3 consecutive highest paid years are used to determine their retirement plan.

They are working the hours, in one way or another. Meetings, court rooms, patrolling, booking. Now, all of their hours might not be productive, but unfortunately, they are necessary.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36631 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

And the federal grants are paying the officers overtime, so it's not hurting the city or the taxpayers.



Ummm.......



ETA: not to mention that the Feds only require 1 checkpoint a month for grant money.

BR ran 70 last year. In order to get more fed funds.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 2:04 pm
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11723 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 2:06 pm to
My cousin is amongst the first ones listed. I just cringed at the salary.
Posted by goatman1419
Prairieville,LA
Member since Jan 2007
3070 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

From that link above

Employees:
PD = 994
FD = 626

Gross Payroll:
PD = $46,089,026.40
FD = $33,047,577.41

Average Gross Salary Per Employee:
PD = $46,367.23
FD = $52,791.66


Doesn't count OT or free housing or free car. Also have to take into Consideration the "age" of each department. The FD is very top heavy due to huge classes hired 27 to 30 years ago and the lack of hiring for 2 to 3 years before this year. You should look into average years of service for each department and that would narrow that gap big time. FD has far less cost footprint than police do.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram