- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bad news for the climate bros?
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:02 pm
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the next generation of climate scenarios," science policy analyst Roger Pielke Jr wrote late last week, and in what he called "big news," the new framework "eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades."
So the oceans aren't about to boil off or freeze over or whatever the current scare story is?
Exactly: "The IPCC and broader research community has now admitted that the scenarios that have dominated climate research, assessment and policy during the past two cycles of the IPCC assessment process are implausible. They describe impossible futures."
This is important because the IPCC's changes resulted in "an update to the Science Based Targets initiative’s rules eliminates the need for steep emission cuts by 2030," Trellis reported on Friday. In other words, even the people committed to radically reduced carbon emissions now say we don't need to radically reduce carbon emissions to save the world or whatever.
LINK
So the oceans aren't about to boil off or freeze over or whatever the current scare story is?
Exactly: "The IPCC and broader research community has now admitted that the scenarios that have dominated climate research, assessment and policy during the past two cycles of the IPCC assessment process are implausible. They describe impossible futures."
This is important because the IPCC's changes resulted in "an update to the Science Based Targets initiative’s rules eliminates the need for steep emission cuts by 2030," Trellis reported on Friday. In other words, even the people committed to radically reduced carbon emissions now say we don't need to radically reduce carbon emissions to save the world or whatever.
quote:
Pielke added that "users of climate models and model output based on legacy scenarios will now face decisions about if and how they’d like to realign with the latest scientific understandings versus continuing to rely on outdated research."
LINK
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:02 pm to weagle1999
Always been a grift. Nothing more and less than that.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:04 pm to weagle1999
Algore became a billionaire on this hoax alone
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:05 pm to weagle1999
See, all their hard work and effort is paying off.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:05 pm to weagle1999
So you are telling me that the same people that can't tell you what the weather will be next week might have made an error on what the weather would be like in 20 years?
Everyone that wasn't a lemming knew that was just a load of garbage. Now, the 'scientists' finally admit it.
Everyone that wasn't a lemming knew that was just a load of garbage. Now, the 'scientists' finally admit it.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:05 pm to weagle1999
Yeah... because they want guilt free data centers.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:08 pm to weagle1999
So now it is ok to believe the UN?
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:09 pm to weagle1999
if you ever want a good chuckle, go back and read all of Al Gore’s climate change theories from the early 2000’s.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:10 pm to TygerLyfe
quote:But, but those “intellectuals” in college lecturing me on why human activity has been the main driver? What are you trying to say baw?
Always been a grift. Nothing more and less than that.
I bet they have the same answer when driving up to Starbucks in a high performance sports car.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:10 pm to weagle1999
Jim and Steph crying on each others shoulders
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:11 pm to weagle1999
Save some giant sequioas or whatever but yeah, as a southerner it's always been hard to care about climate change when I'm surrounded by pines as far as the eye can see & relentless weeds in every flower bed.
Just my $.02. They've got to be sucking up some of that Chinese pollution
Just my $.02. They've got to be sucking up some of that Chinese pollution
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:11 pm to weagle1999
But what does this mean for MANBEARPIG?
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:16 pm to Gifman
J
He also had an old Smokey Gulfstream. .
quote:
Algore became a billionaire on this hoax alone
He also had an old Smokey Gulfstream. .
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:16 pm to weagle1999
They only removed the scenarios that had the world fricked by 2050. They also removed the scenario that had the world just fine.
Now they have the world fricked after 2100.
Thankfully, now we will all be dead by then.
Now they have the world fricked after 2100.
Thankfully, now we will all be dead by then.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:22 pm to weagle1999
I assume most people here are old enough to remember that the coming environmental disaster was global cooling before it became global warming and climate change.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:22 pm to weagle1999
quote:
new framework "eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades."
Tell that to the other post that said New Orleans will be gone in just a few decades.
Those doomsday scenarios while they make for great fodder for people to discuss, only yield millions of dollars in more coastal studies and investigations while not turning a single grain of sand or dirt or placing rocks along the coast.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:24 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
Now they have the world fricked after 2100.
Immediacy sells, but it’s never smart to predict a date you’ll live past.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:26 pm to weagle1999
PJ Media is your link? Go ask the fisherman in the Atlantic and Pacific. They will tell you the waters are warming. The fisherman in Ireland will tell you.
The grift is by the oil companies who are paying for articles and climate deniers. That's a fact
The grift is by the oil companies who are paying for articles and climate deniers. That's a fact
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:31 pm to weagle1999
So essentially what they’re saying is it’s a lost cause and we should just give up and stop groaning about it? Because it’s too bad and coming too soon to realistically do something about it, if they’re correct.
Good. Sick of hearing about it.
Good. Sick of hearing about it.
Popular
Back to top

23








