0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bad news for the Anti-flock bros
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:22 pm to blueboy
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:22 pm to blueboy
quote:
So, because of black people, we have to submit to an Orwellian existence?
Orwellian existence is about double-speak and perpetuating lies for the sake of conformity (and personal safety).
Police body cams and flock cameras are showing truths indiscriminately.
Orwell isnt the correct parallel at all.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:27 pm to 3nOut
Yeah frick privacy for the rest of us because a small percentage of people are criminals and cops are too fricking lazy to do their jobs.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:53 pm to blueboy
Not at all. But the violent and relentless crime, absolutely.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:56 pm to JetsetNuggs
quote:
"it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape, than that one innocent Person should suffer"
-Ben Franklin
Dumb. Hundreds will suffer as the result of those 100 guilty going free.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:07 pm to 3nOut
In HS, while reading 1984, my biggest disbelief was that some people would actually be cheerleading for Big Brother. Now, here I am in 2026 watching it happen. Don’t be a fool.
You have no idea the sophistication of these facial recognition cameras that are plugged into Ai and recording every second. They can read a text message on the passenger seat while you drive 80mph on the interstate as speed and other details are recorded.
This site actually has some brainwashed simpletons fighting on their controller’s behalf. Muh LiCEnSe PlAtE rEaDeRs.
You have no idea the sophistication of these facial recognition cameras that are plugged into Ai and recording every second. They can read a text message on the passenger seat while you drive 80mph on the interstate as speed and other details are recorded.
This site actually has some brainwashed simpletons fighting on their controller’s behalf. Muh LiCEnSe PlAtE rEaDeRs.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:13 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Yeah frick privacy for the rest of us because a small percentage of people are criminals and cops are too fricking lazy to do their jobs.
What kind of loss of privacy are we talking about here when you are driving down a public street?
So we're all supposed to be less safe so you can cheat on your wife?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:22 pm to Ben Rumson
quote:
What kind of loss of privacy are we talking about here when you are driving down a public street?
Every one on public streets just need to close their eyes.
Privacy first.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:24 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
You have no idea the sophistication of these facial recognition cameras that are plugged into Ai and recording every second. They can read a text message on your passenger seat while you drive 80 on the interstate and your speed and other details are recorded. We actually have brainwashed simpletons fighting on their behalf.
You're being the simpleton here to suggest that we can just decide that we aren't going to let the world keep improving these systems. We don't have that power.
We can make an attempt at regulating these new technologies and putting in common sense controls to limit it's abuse, but I'm not confident that we can even do that when we voluntarily promote convicted criminals to our highest government positions.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:29 pm to 3nOut
quote:
Bad news for the Anti-flock bros
I remember when this board used to mock England (in re: London) for being a surveillance state.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:46 pm to Ben Rumson
That's exactly right. It's public roads. Why the frick do people they have a "right to privacy" in the open public?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 2:03 pm to Ben Rumson
Compliance gives support. Resistance slows or stops advancement.
The reason they are installing cameras at this reckless pace: to make the populace think it’s already too far gone.
You are a victim of a propaganda campaign but you don’t realize it. Don’t lick the boot.
The reason they are installing cameras at this reckless pace: to make the populace think it’s already too far gone.
You are a victim of a propaganda campaign but you don’t realize it. Don’t lick the boot.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 2:17 pm to F1y0n7h3W4LL
A) Wikipedia
B) Why are so many so willing to quickly give up on so many fronts?
B) Why are so many so willing to quickly give up on so many fronts?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 2:24 pm to Ben Rumson
quote:
We can make an attempt at regulating these new technologies and putting in common sense controls to limit it's abuse, but I'm not confident that we can even do that when we voluntarily promote convicted criminals to our highest government positions.
These systems have been around for over 10 years.
The only reason why this has become news all of a sudden is because Flock began checking on its usage and noticed violations in the terms of service. Because of that, they ramped up increased checks (precheck SOPs and monthly audits) and they shortened the data storage from a 30 day default down to 2 weeks.
Ironically, it has been the development of systems and common sense practices which has resulted in newsworthy abuses by law enforcement (which has included prosecution of law).
The only reason why there is a thread on the rant is because safeguards are in place and working.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:43 pm to meansonny
quote:
These systems have been around for over 10 years.
Any publicly funded CCTV that the government employs (red light cameras, etc) are bullshite in the supposed land of the free.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:46 pm to blueboy
quote:I didn't write this
because of black people, we have to submit to an Orwellian existence?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:47 pm to 3nOut
Then they looked up their ex girlfriends etc
Posted on 9/19/26 at 4:41 am to blueboy
quote:
So, because of black people, we have to submit to an Orwellian existence?
Baton Rougeans are clearly not happy with the status quo but also not happy with the proposed solution. Y’all want more actual policing? Haha good luck.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 8:33 am to Ben Rumson
quote:
What kind of loss of privacy are we talking about here when you are driving down a public street? So we're all supposed to be less safe so you can cheat on your wife?
So here is the test. If, as you say, there is no right to privacy in a public space, would you support the video from these cameras being accessible for anyone? Tax dollars are paying for them, so tax payers should have access. I mean, parents can keep their kids safe no? You can “make sure” you wife gets to work safely. You would agree with this?
Posted on 9/19/26 at 8:37 am to Commander Rabb
I think you answered your own question there.
Inbreds
Inbreds
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News