- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:38 am to AngryBeavers
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:38 am to AngryBeavers
quote:
Some group is always oppressed...
let's not bring atheists into this discussion
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
let's not bring atheists into this discussion
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:39 am to TheIndulger
quote:
So the problem is society looks down on people doing what makes them happy, even if it's not "normal"
I'm sure you're guilty of that to some extent as well.
i typically look down on people for thinking emotionally-irrationally or making choices that directly affect others negatively
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:41 am to link
quote:
these loud mouths on both sides expect the unachievable...the women think they're a princess, and the guys think they'll be 40 yr old porshe-driving doctors. they're both dumb
I think most guys in this thread haven't ruled out marriage or a serious relationship. The main point of the thread is that getting married young no longer makes sense for well educated men. Women are very uninteresting, have very few hobbies/passions/goals, and have super unrealistic expectations about what a man/relationship should be. All of these factors create shifty relationships/marriages, and lead to divorces where men often get taken to the shed.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm all for women having careers and being financially independent. the problem is that women can both have a career and divorce-rape you
If you are a house husband who married a breadwinner, how could she possibly divorce rape you? Yet the red pill/male rights movement would say this is feminism in action.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:44 am to TheIndulger
quote:
If you are a house husband who married a breadwinner, how could she possibly divorce rape you?
she gets domiciliary status and you have to pay child support (the calculation includes her income)
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
buddy of mine made about 30% of what his wife made annually. she left him and filed for divorce, there were no adultery or anything like that on either side, she just wanted to leave. of course she gets primary custody of daughter and he has to pay her child support....When she makes 3 times what he does.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:53 am to Tigerlaff
quote:
The dumb part is where men have started refusing to take other men at their word. It is incredibly disrespectful to tell another adult "You don't know what you really want. You want what I have."
I think a lot of men that say this are still trying to convince themselves that they wanted a family.
quote:
Today, women are allowed to say "I don't want a career, I want to raise a family instead." They can equally say, "I don't want a family or a career, I want to be a stay at home wife." They can decide not to have a family at all and instead pursue powerful and respected positions in politics or business. The world is their oyster. Whatever they want to make of their lives, we as a society have come to understand that it is rude to publicly second-guess them and tell them that they cannot mold it into whatever they wish.
And this is why they're single.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:02 am to rocket31
I agree with the OP, without reading this thread.
But consider, CSN News (the source link) is pure bullshite propoganda, IMHO.
But consider, CSN News (the source link) is pure bullshite propoganda, IMHO.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:09 am to uway
quote:
I don't disagree with any of that. I'm just glad I didn't let that overall trend prevent me from finding a partner that isn't anything like that.
Partner choice is important...but there is a very good chance that you are very much responsible for having the type of marriage that you do. In fact, I'd bet that a very large part of you finding the right partner was you showing her what your relationship would be like...that you would be the head of the relationship...and her acceptance of that.
I think SFP's point is pretty damn shallow because it accepts that a man in a relationship is a victim to the current "societal norm" being pushed. I can't imagine that there is anyone in a successful marriage who is as impotent as that.
The truth is that, in large part, your marriage will be as successful as you are willing to make it. It involves being sympathetic at times to your partner's needs and being willing to stand up and lead at times.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:12 am to moneyg
quote:
I think SFP's point is pretty damn shallow because it accepts that a man in a relationship is a victim to the current "societal norm" being pushed. I can't imagine that there is anyone in a successful marriage who is as impotent as that.
move to a legit urban area and see the relationship structure. emasculated men are "in"
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:13 am to TheOcean
quote:
The main point of the thread is that getting married young no longer makes sense for well educated men.
quote:
lead to divorces where men often get taken to the shed.
both of these are fine points, and i agree. but then you did this:
quote:try to see it from both angles. as more and more female attention whores are posting their bikini pics all over instagram, more and more guys are jerking off to them and expecting that level of quality for every woman. same with the internet porn they're addicted to. they're seeing a skewed percentage of attractive women that doesn't accurately represent the real world. long story short, technology and social media are polluting BOTH SIDES. it's not just one side's fault.
Women are very uninteresting, have very few hobbies/passions/goals, and have super unrealistic expectations about what a man/relationship should be.
balance. big picture.
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 11:17 am
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:17 am to link
quote:
as more and more female attention whores are posting their bikini pics all over instagram, more and more guys are jerking off to them and expecting that level of quality for every woman. same with the internet porn they're addicted to. they're seeing a skewed percentage of attractive women that doesn't accurately represent the real world.
well there can only be so many "high value" men, but "high value" men can expect this outlier slice of women
and
"high value" men can troll the physical prime age of females (18-24) until their 40s without much issue
that's the issue. it doesn't work both ways. women do not have the same options b/c their physical decline is severe, and it occurs around the time when they reach their ability to be "high value" like men. life's not fair.
now, are some men over-stating their value in this thread? yes
but in terms of "Big picture" hypocrisy, it isn't really there.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:18 am to link
At LSU, every slapdick's hobbies were 1a) drinking 1b)lsu football
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
move to a legit urban area and see the relationship structure. emasculated men are "in"
My wife went on a rant the other night watching some bs show about how disgusted she is at the kind of man that is "cool" now.
I've rarely been so proud of her.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:22 am to RandySavage
that's part of the urban v. rural divide. you're going to find "progressive" ideas in urban areas moreso, that creates the difference in urban v. rural (that is our biggest political divide in the US currently)
feminists can only play the "equality" card if they bring the physical attributes to more equal levels. this requires emasculated, feminine, weak, and non-aggressive males. so you go look at the current trends, and that falls in line. even physically fit men must neuter their strength if they want to fit into "modern society". if not you run the risk of finding yourself "on the wrong side of history"
feminists can only play the "equality" card if they bring the physical attributes to more equal levels. this requires emasculated, feminine, weak, and non-aggressive males. so you go look at the current trends, and that falls in line. even physically fit men must neuter their strength if they want to fit into "modern society". if not you run the risk of finding yourself "on the wrong side of history"
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:22 am to rocket31
quote:
Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married
Men are getting smarter.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:23 am to link
quote:
you got some guys praising the 20-45 female population about how hot they are now, and then you got this guy talking about how fat women are these days.
That's very simple. The hot are hotter than they've ever been. The average is what is now fatter.
quote:
you're turning into what you hate. you're both wrong, you're both cringe inducing, and both of your extreme views are misguided. have some balance and chill the frick out.
yup
Posted on 3/10/15 at 11:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
feminists can only play the "equality" card if they bring the physical attributes to more equal levels. this requires emasculated, feminine, weak, and non-aggressive males. so you go look at the current trends, and that falls in line. even physically fit men must neuter their strength if they want to fit into "modern society". if not you run the risk of finding yourself "on the wrong side of history"
I really don't think this is a prevalent as you make it
I've spent plenty of time in very urban areas, and sure, what you are talking about is out there, but it is not the dominant relationship structure
not even close really
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 11:27 am
Popular
Back to top



1








