Started By
Message

re: Average waist size of women 20 and older is 38"

Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:01 am to
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:01 am to
The mode would be more useful here in conjunction with the brand options by size chart. If the mode is somewhere between 25 and 35, closer to 30, it would make a whole lot of sense.
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15791 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:02 am to
quote:

Lol

Well, frick me. I suppose I’m a lost cause.


For my size, I would be 225+ lbs to have that big of a waist. I'd be the size of the cows that pushed this chart to a 38.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31530 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:03 am to
Women now buying more elastic pants than jeans

LINK

Posted by robertLSU
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
429 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:09 am to
So the point of this article is instead of women losing weight, we need to make bigger clothes? Someone just kill me.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68453 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:09 am to
I’m far from skinny, but it always amazes me to see just how many overweight girls there are in Louisiana. It takes very little effort to stay a decent size
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
33653 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:11 am to
Well, I’m 6’2” and running just about 248 pounds. My pants are typically a 38 but a couple 40s.

That said, my chest is north of 52” and arms 18-19”.

Should I lose some? Hell yes! At 220-225, it’s a pretty dramatic change......but, I’m not too bothered being a cow
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15791 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Well, I’m 6’2” and running just about 248 pounds. My pants are typically a 38 but a couple 40s.

That said, my chest is north of 52” and arms 18-19”.

Should I lose some? Hell yes! At 220-225, it’s a pretty dramatic change......but, I’m not too bothered being a cow


See I run about 185 lbs with a 34" waist. It would take some effort to get to a 38" waist for me.

I'd like to get back to about a 32" waist BUT I don't care to work out.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19460 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:15 am to
quote:

That’s bigger than my waist size

But muh water gainz!
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60681 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:16 am to
quote:

I’m 6’2” and running just about 248 pounds. My pants are typically a 38 but a couple 40s.
I'm 6'3 and I'd probably kill my myself if I got over 220
Posted by SwampTrash
Member since May 2017
450 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:19 am to
Is nobody going to mention the store selling the 62" jeans???
Posted by Evil Little Thing
Member since Jul 2013
11622 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Is nobody going to mention the store selling the 62" jeans???




Good catch
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15791 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Is nobody going to mention the store selling the 62" jeans???


Gravy special
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61451 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:23 am to
Any idea what the average men’s waist is?
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19460 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:24 am to
About 35.0
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15791 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Any idea what the average men’s waist is?


LINK

quote:

Well, according to 2010 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, these are the measurements of the average American man:
Height: 5 feet 9 inches (69.3 inches)
Weight: 195.5 pounds
Waist circumference: 39.7 inches


ETA:
quote:

If he were wearing pants, you might think our average Joe would be in a size 38, 39 or 40, depending on the cut. But, turns out, the top-selling pant/trouser size in the U.S. is actually a 34.


quote:

"Of the guys who actually have a waist close to the average (between, say, 38 to 40 inches), the highest percentage buy size 34 pants (close to 55 percent), followed by size 36 (about 35 percent). Only a very small percentage buy size 38," he explained in an email.


quote:

Where does the major discrepancy come from? A few places. For one, "vanity sizing" — where the actual size of a garment is bigger than advertised in an effort to flatter you — is not just for women anymore. Gribbin says the waist measurement in a man's pant is generally 1.5 to 2 inches larger than the stated size. (Or up to 5 inches, if you're shopping at Old Navy.)
This post was edited on 6/26/18 at 7:30 am
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8775 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:28 am to
Guess it all depends. I'm 6'2 and I hover around 215 and I am no cow. I wear a size 36 waist.

All men arent built the same.
Posted by Evil Little Thing
Member since Jul 2013
11622 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Waist circumference: 39.7 inches


Vanity sizing extends to men, too. I’m positive these guys are wearing 36 pants & haven’t really measured their waists lately.

I’ve been reading a ton of amazon reviews for clothes lately, and I’m constantly surprised that women who are 5’4 & 215 are wearing a size 12 or large.

Vanity sizing makes people feel like things can’t be that bad.

ETA just saw your edit saying the same thing about vanity sizing
This post was edited on 6/26/18 at 7:34 am
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15791 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Vanity sizing extends to men, too. I’m positive these guys are wearing 36 pants & haven’t really measured their waists lately.

I’ve been reading a ton of amazon reviews for clothes lately, and I’m constantly surprised that women who are 5’4 & 215 are wearing a size 12 or large.

Vanity sizing makes people feel like things can’t be that bad.


It states that later in the article.

ETA: If the article is right, I'm going buy some 29"-30" shorts again at Old Navy. I haven't done that since 8th grade.
This post was edited on 6/26/18 at 7:38 am
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35330 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:34 am to
Holy shite that's awful. frick me.

I get sad and angry about this shite at the same time.

I know I am fully capable of being fat, because I weighed 50lbs more at age 33 than I do at 43. I made some very simple changes that ANYONE can do without anything crazy.

I have to go up to a 32 or else I look like a skinny-jean hipster in the legs, but without a belt 32s fall off of me st 6' tall and not a slight build.

In 99% of people, there is simply no legit excuse to be that fat.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61451 posts
Posted on 6/26/18 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Vanity sizing extends to men, too.


I guess thats why my Brooks suit pants are 2 sizes bigger than my normal pants

I'm not sure how to feel about this
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram