- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are we ready to take college tuition out of the legislature's hands?
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:17 pm to Brummy
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:17 pm to Brummy
I love it when the anti-government, pro-market folks suddenly become pro-government, anti-market on this issue.
Let LSU price itself to the market. If they reach too far, the market will handle it.
Let LSU price itself to the market. If they reach too far, the market will handle it.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:18 pm to Slippy
Yes yes yes yes yes yes
Let LSU manifest their own destiny
Let LSU manifest their own destiny
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:19 pm to Slippy
quote:Of course.
Are we ready to take college tuition out of the legislature's hands?
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:26 pm to Slippy
Absolutely. The legislature should have no say in what LSU, or any other state college charges for tuition. The federal government needs to keep their hands away as well.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 6:19 pm to Slippy
No other state required 2/3 legislative approval.
Think about that. Every other state doesn't have that.., and most of them have better functioning college systems.
Think about that. Every other state doesn't have that.., and most of them have better functioning college systems.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 6:20 pm to Slippy
If Lsu doubled tuition, it would force more kids into community colleges and regional schools, which is where it should be.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 6:38 pm to LSUFanHouston
People will pay higher tuition prices until they feel LSU is not worth it. Why should the state have the ability to artificially keep LSU's tuition prices low if LSU could/should be able to increase their tuition. In state tuition is already one of the lowest in the country. They should be able to raise it to be competitive.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 6:44 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
No other state required 2/3 legislative approval. Think about that. Every other state doesn't have that.., and most of them have better functioning college systems.
Legislature controls tops. If you take thier approval out of thier hands LSU will fall over themselves to raise tuition which will put pressure on tops. They need to check and balance each other or tops will go away. Make no doubt. LSU wants to see tops gone long term and put that $ on thier balance sheet. This is phase 1.
I think tops is about the best government program this 3rd world country of a state has.
I personally pay thousands a year to my local public schools for people that place zero value on the education they get on my dime. I gladly support my tax dollars going to kids and families that handle thier business and don't deserve debt. Let it go to people that are doing the right thing for once. Your taxes aren't going down for it.
This post was edited on 10/18/16 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 10/18/16 at 7:08 pm to Slippy
I'll be voting for this. Add me to the list of people tired of the politicians playing politics with college tuition and tops. These are the idiots that gave the schools like two months notice they were cutting tops but wouldn't raise tuition. Deep cuts.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 7:17 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
. It gets plenty of money. Just not the money IT WANTS!!! Thats why all the drama from FKA.
I will try extend to know the details, but my senior design project was funded by fculture services. We proved that our "green/sustainable" project was impossible to make financially feasible, but their attitude was, we allocated 25k to this so we have to spend it. Spent a year dealing with that group and that is the typical government attitude they had. Yes, we are in a cut back, but we were budgeted x amount, so we have to spend it even if it's not needed so that we can justify needing x+ amount next year. Then when we don't get x amount, we cry we are underfunded.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 7:19 pm to King Teal
quote:
LSU will be fine just as soon as they trim some fat and start focusing solely on educating students on disciplines that are sustainable and allow our students to make a difference in the productive world.
Way too many BS liberal arts majors, and the string of under-qualified, over-payed professors that come with it. Departmental staff needs to be cut, too.
While we're at it, make some substantial revisions to the Reveille, or just cut your losses. That thing has become a disgrace to journalism as of late.
LSU has cut dozens of programs over the past 10 years. There's very little left to cut. Those overpaid professors aren't the cream of the crop. LSU has lost so many great professors because other schools pay more. There's far more competition for professors than people realize and for most, LSU isn't doing them a service by employing them.
This post was edited on 10/18/16 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 10/18/16 at 7:27 pm to Libertariantiger
All a vote in support of this does is gives one dicked up government entity more leverage over the other dicked up government entitly. And in doing so destroys one of the few programs that helps honest people, in this state, in tops.
This post was edited on 10/18/16 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 10/18/16 at 7:33 pm to Slippy
One other thing, the article specifically names Jindal as part of the problem. The half Shelly idea of his has screwed the budget. Most people don't realize the bag of dicks he handed this state with his ineptness. Cut taxes and increase spending leaves us where we are at, broke.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:19 pm to oauron
quote:
SU has cut dozens of programs over the past 10 years. There's very little left to cut. Those overpaid professors aren't the cream of the crop. LSU has lost so many great professors because other schools pay more. There's far more competition for professors than people realize and for most, LSU isn't doing them a service by employing them.
They've also greenlighted an 80+ MILLION dollar lazy river funded by...students. The same students who bitch about higher tuition. Sorry, but if you can have a lazy river you don't need my money for other shite. When LSU allows a full review of every expenditure and every allocation of every dollar, I'll be more receptive to their arguement. Until then, tough shite. Private business has to compete, provide customer satisfaction, and operate in the black. Most without benefit of a subsidy. LSU should be no different.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:26 pm to Slippy
quote:
Are we ready to take college tuition out of the legislature's hands?
I sure as hell will be voting yes on amendment 2.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:37 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
Sorry, but if you can have a lazy river you don't need my money for other shite.
You dumb.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:41 pm to Slippy
I'm fine with it if it does not affect tops. I don't want taxpayers to be on the hook because LSU decided to increase tuition.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:50 pm to TigerGman
quote:
You dumb
Yes and your sophisticated post suggests you're in remedial classes.
Obviously a product of La public schooling.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:55 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
Yes and your sophisticated post suggests you're in remedial classes.
Obviously a product of La public schooling.
quote:
its not underfunded you dumb shite. (and yes, only a dumb shite would allege so). Its got a spending problem,
Until you learn the proper contraction form for it is, I doubt you should be casting stones numbnutts....
Posted on 10/18/16 at 8:57 pm to Slippy
Whatever happened to free college? I thought that was a great idea.
Popular
Back to top


3






