- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are we ready to take college tuition out of the legislature's hands?
Posted on 10/18/16 at 9:08 pm to Slippy
Posted on 10/18/16 at 9:08 pm to Slippy
quote:
I love it when the anti-government, pro-market folks suddenly become pro-government, anti-market on this issue.
Let LSU price itself to the market. If they reach too far, the market will handle it.
So be a private entity and receive no tax dollars and have to balance its budget to stay open.
That sounds like a great idea.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 9:12 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
They've also greenlighted an 80+ MILLION dollar lazy river funded by...students. The same students who bitch about higher tuition. Sorry, but if you can have a lazy river you don't need my money for other shite
They paid $80 Million to renovate the UREC which was grossly undersized for a University of 35,000 students
Posted on 10/18/16 at 9:23 pm to Cap Crunch
quote:
They paid $80 Million to renovate the UREC which was grossly undersized for a University of 35,000 students
Yes and I'm sure the Urec is essential to the primary mission of educating students
Google search the lazy river and get back to me on the cost.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 9:45 pm to tigerinthebueche
UREC expansion fact sheet
Look, the lazy river is retarded, but an upgrade to the UREC was vastly needed, and seeing as it was paid for by students, I don't really see why its an issue
Look, the lazy river is retarded, but an upgrade to the UREC was vastly needed, and seeing as it was paid for by students, I don't really see why its an issue
Posted on 10/18/16 at 9:49 pm to CptBengal
quote:
11-13% from the state isnt a lot to make up.
That's like 110 million dollars in additional revenue.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 10:10 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
Mr. Alexander,
This subject, funding, is my biggest gripe with F. King. He is the leader/CEO of the University but every time they don't give him all that he wants he goes running around screaming how it is the end of times and they need to cancel football. Can you imagine if a private business CEO did this when revenue took a downturn?
His job is to advocate for more funding but then do with what he gets. Not bitch, moan and cry. Put on your big boy pants King.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 10:16 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
They've also greenlighted an 80+ MILLION dollar lazy river funded by...students.
Students voted on the fee increase for the rec-center.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 10:19 pm to jbgleason
quote:
His job is to advocate for more funding but then do with what he gets. Not bitch, moan and cry. Put on your big boy pants King.
The issues over the last 5 years or so has been that as LSU has increased tuition via the Grad Act, the legislature just cut their portion by the same percentage.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 10:21 pm to Cap Crunch
quote:
Look, the lazy river is retarded, but an upgrade to the UREC was vastly needed, and seeing as it was paid for by students, I don't really see why its an issue
agree it's retarded. That's why I sighted it instead of the Urec. But both are expenses that aren't essential. And since students can buck up an extra couple of hundred per semester for a pool or gym, they can put up for their tuition so tax payers don't have to.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 10:22 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
they can put up for their tuition so tax payers don't have to.
You realize that's exactly what Ammedment 2 is asking to happen? Lol
Posted on 10/18/16 at 11:03 pm to Slippy
Will vote for this.
Alumni are a huge problem, though. I wish all the fools who donate only to TAF understood how much more important it is to donate to the endowment instead. It's embarrassing.
Alumni are a huge problem, though. I wish all the fools who donate only to TAF understood how much more important it is to donate to the endowment instead. It's embarrassing.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 11:28 pm to knuckleballer
quote:
Legislature controls tops. If you take thier approval out of thier hands LSU will fall over themselves to raise tuition which will put pressure on tops.
Starting this year, TOPS is capped. Now, the legislature could uncap it, but, I doubt they will. If LSU has a massive tuition increase, it won't be covered by TOPS.
quote:
LSU wants to see tops gone long term and put that $ on thier balance sheet.
TOPS pays the colleges... so... they get the cash either way. I don't understand your point.
quote:
I think tops is about the best government program this 3rd world country of a state has.
Yet, so many people on here bashed Bernie for his free college plan. TOPS is so easy to get it might as well be free college for all.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 11:34 pm to Slippy
It's absurd the legislature controls tuition in the first place.
Popular
Back to top

0




