- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti-mask protesters' new weapon: wearing masks that offer no COVID-19 protection
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:52 pm to RB10
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:52 pm to RB10
quote:Wait, isn't that what your counter is based on?
You've just decided that Biden is more popular based on your emotions?
That's definitely better.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:52 pm to Chucktown_Badger
You're proving you don't know anything. Some of those states have the highest death rates in the world controlled for population size. Your cross state comparison is totally irrelevant based on demographics and climate alone LMFAO
Believer in science, more like believer in narrative and confirmation bias
Believer in science, more like believer in narrative and confirmation bias
This post was edited on 7/17/20 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:53 pm to RB10
quote:I didn't say that, either. I said he's a step up from Hillary (if only barely), and that the left is much more enthusiastic this time. Are you going to argue either of these points, or just make up more bullshite to argue instead?
Oh. You've just decided that Biden is more popular based on your emotions?
That's definitely better.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:54 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Prove it with data that it either happening or not happening in the United States right now. You don't get it. Those are academic studies in controlled environments. You look more foolish as you spew out your half knowledge on the subject.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:54 pm to WDE24
quote:
Wait, isn't that what your counter is based on?
My counter is based on the fact that Trump won the last election despite being "behind" in all of the polls.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:55 pm to RB10
quote:Are you going to deny that conservatives would hate the EC if demographics happened to favor the left under this system?
RB10
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:56 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:
That list is essentially a list of states with highest per capita death.
Overall or current rate? The last five days, Illinois has had 83 deaths, Louisiana has had 79. So about the same, but when you consider that Illinois has almost 3x the population, that death rate is a fraction.
And it stands to reason that the hardest hit would enact the highest restrictions, and we're now seeing the impact of those practices on death rate trend lines.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:56 pm to Chucktown_Badger
You don't need 70%.
Many are already immune.
Diamond princess 17% infected. In an area with like 200,000/SQ kilometer.
Sweden is like 30% infected.
There deaths are down 98% or so.
There's no way some inherant immunity isn't present.
Many are already immune.
Diamond princess 17% infected. In an area with like 200,000/SQ kilometer.
Sweden is like 30% infected.
There deaths are down 98% or so.
There's no way some inherant immunity isn't present.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:56 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Not to menion these anti-mask "muh freedom" people who are Trump apologists are literally handing the election to Biden with their actions.
snowflake
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:56 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:So slowing the spread would lead to fewer infections if a vaccine were created while there spread was being slowed, right?
Of course lower R0 after vaccine. Ppl are immune.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:57 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I didn't say that, either. I said he's a step up from Hillary (if only barely), and that the left is much more enthusiastic this time.
Are you under the assumption that the right is just in a holding pattern or something?
quote:
Are you going to argue either of these points, or just make up more bullshite to argue instead?
Why would I bother arguing? Your opinion is amusing.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:58 pm to John88
I agree that being forced to wear these in public is incredibly stupid.
But if you are going to go through the trouble of wearing a mask at all, why not attempt to use that that offers some protection?
But if you are going to go through the trouble of wearing a mask at all, why not attempt to use that that offers some protection?
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:58 pm to RB10
quote:What a transparent and lame deflection.
Why would I bother arguing? Your opinion is amusing
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:59 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Are you going to deny that conservatives would hate the EC if demographics happened to favor the left under this system?
Could vs. would.
You need to learn the difference hoss.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:59 pm to wutangfinancial
quote:
Prove it with data that it either happening or not happening in the United States right now. You don't get it. Those are academic studies in controlled environments. You look more foolish as you spew out your half knowledge on the subject.
You have literally added zero actual data to this discussion, and refuses to acknowledge or accept any data anyone else posts, simply dismissing it with wild and unfounded opinions. So I'll gloss over your stuff moving forward.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 4:59 pm to WDE24
quote:
so slowing spread fewer infections if vaccine developed
Yes, of course.
However, at best(highly unlikely) that's 6 months out at absolute earliest.
In 6 months we'll be at herd status anyways.
Economy will be fricked.
Kids uneducated.
Alcoholism up.
Depression.
Etc
Even in the best scenario.
It isn't near worth it.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 5:00 pm to WDE24
quote:
What a transparent and lame deflection.
I'm sorry that it bothers you. The dude is making statements of fact about future events in politics.
That's about as amusing as it gets.
Posted on 7/17/20 at 5:01 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
snowflake
I'm not sure how that qualifies as a snowflake moment. I'm literally saying that this continued situation is damaging trump's chances at re-election even further. The people who want him to win will cost him the election.
Of course, this is my prediction, and we'll see
Posted on 7/17/20 at 5:02 pm to RB10
quote:I'm under the assumption that a lot of Trump votes in 2016 were really "not Hillary" votes. Do you disagree? I am also under the assumption that a significant portion of dems stayed home because Hillary had it "in the bag". Do you disagree?
Are you under the assumption that the right is just in a holding pattern or something?
quote:I don't know, but you're making up shite to argue against anyway.
Why would I bother arguing?
Posted on 7/17/20 at 5:02 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
I want some fricking football
me, too
quote:no, we're not. It's all political at this point. There is absolutely nothing credible anywhere about this virus.
a bunch of idiots are making that less of a likelihood every day because they think they know better than the experts, medical professionals, etc.
We go from flatten the curve to slow the spread to if it prevents just on death
Labs are only forwarding information about positive test results and blaming motorcycle deaths on COVID-19. I'm looking at you, Florida
People who don't show for a COVID test are presumed positive and reported as positive in their state numbers.
There is way too much virus frickery going on. And EVERYTHING is done through a political lens.
You want people to comply with things that actually impact public health, stop with the frickery and give actual, true and verified information.
Popular
Back to top



1





