- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "All Glaciers Will Be Gone By 2020" -- Signs being removed at Glacier NP
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:27 am to No Colors
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:27 am to No Colors
quote:
Government creates fake scary problems that are meant to frighten people into accepting fake scary solutions, which are offered by --- wait for it --- the same government that created the fake scary problem to begin with.
The reason the government thinks we're stupid, is because the majority of us are.
You gonna get droned bro......
0
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:32 am to Salmon
quote:
such passive aggressiveness
And the retort bears no hypocrisy. Or data. But with good reason on the latter.
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 9:34 am
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:35 am to No Colors
Global warming is the biggest scam of al time
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:36 am to ItNeverRains
data for what, exactly?
you want specific data for models demonstrating what the size of the glaciers in Glacier would be if we removed all human element?
I have no idea if that data exists and I'm certainly not spending time looking for it
Even if I found it, you wouldn't believe it, so why bother?
you want specific data for models demonstrating what the size of the glaciers in Glacier would be if we removed all human element?
I have no idea if that data exists and I'm certainly not spending time looking for it
Even if I found it, you wouldn't believe it, so why bother?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:39 am to Salmon
quote:
you want specific data for models demonstrating what the size of the glaciers in Glacier would be if we removed all human element?
Yes. How else will I know exactly how awful I am and how I need to be micromanaged by globalist if I don’t know my increased impact to a naturally occurring phenomenon?
quote:
Even if I found it, you wouldn't believe it, so why bother?
Physics is my jam. I’m a big fan of the sciences. Throw some stats at me.
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 9:41 am
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:39 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
How else will I know exactly how awful I am and how I need to be micromanaged by globalist if I don’t know my increased impact to a naturally occurring phenomenon?
and this is why its pointless to even discuss this topic Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:42 am to Salmon
quote:
and this is why its pointless to even discuss this topic
If I reword it in PC format will you reconsider?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:42 am to Salmon
Its pointless to talk about it because people like you throw out wildly ridiculous "predictions" used as scare tactics then completely ignore it when those "predictions" are laughably inaccurate.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:44 am to ItNeverRains
I don't know what that even means
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:44 am to TigerChief10
quote:
Its pointless to talk about it because people like you throw out wildly ridiculous "predictions" used as scare tactics then completely ignore it when those "predictions" are laughably inaccurate.
link?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:45 am to No Colors
quote:
Don't forget the Red Communist Scare of the 50s
This one was correct, just see your MSM / Democrat Party.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:50 am to Salmon
quote:
I don't know what that even means
The naive know it all defense. A trademark for liberals.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:53 am to LongueCarabine
quote:
Don’t forget the Acid Rain hoax of the 80’s.
well, this is partly true. the pH of rain has dropped, esp in the NE. it erodes stone and makes water habitats less than ideal for marine life
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:53 am to ItNeverRains
what? do you think your comment was "anti-PC" or something? and I took offense to that?
You are all over the place.
quote:
A trademark for liberals.
Right. Because if one believes that humans are capable of affecting the climate then they must be liberal.
Amazing stuff as always.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:54 am to No Colors
We’re going to look back on this and be so disappointed that so many of our generation fell for this bs.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:57 am to Salmon
quote:
have no idea if that data exists and I'm certainly not spending time looking for it
My biggest pet peave. I live in a very heavily glaciated area where glaciers have been retreating for thousands of years, with some oscillations in between. Yet we are constantly reminded by government "experts" of all people that CC is melting off the glaciers.
It's far more complicated than that.
As with any myth there is some truth, it just gets bastardized by ideology.
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 10:12 am
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:01 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
and I believe we will be able to control the climate in the next 100-150 years
Outstanding. Just amazing
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:02 am to Salmon
quote:
Right. Because if one believes that humans are capable of affecting the climate then they must be liberal. Amazing stuff as always.
Wrong. I’m open to the fact as well. But I will wait for the data to show what that affect is. If it’s .00001%, it’s nonsense.
What I’m against is the measures desired by leftist who assume humans are an overwhelming detriment to a naturally occurring phenomenon with no scientific data to support it.
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:03 am to rattlebucket
quote:
Outstanding. Just amazing
Do you even Space Force bro?
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:07 am to RogerTheShrubber
Right. Which is why it was exceptionally dumb to put the "2020" date on the signs. Just complete lack of awareness. It is pure fear mongering and it just further drive the politicization of the topic. It's frustrating to no end.
It is why I despise the whole "settled science" nonsense, especially with something as complex as the Earth's mechanics.
It is a pretty safe assumption that humans are affecting the Earth's climate. But why what percentage and exactly how is still being determined.
It is just how science works. Today's studies will almost assuredly either be proven wrong or their conclusion will be improved upon in the near future. But coming to the wrong conclusions is still learning.
It is why I despise the whole "settled science" nonsense, especially with something as complex as the Earth's mechanics.
It is a pretty safe assumption that humans are affecting the Earth's climate. But why what percentage and exactly how is still being determined.
It is just how science works. Today's studies will almost assuredly either be proven wrong or their conclusion will be improved upon in the near future. But coming to the wrong conclusions is still learning.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News