- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:18 pm to Larry
quote:Yes
We approach the right lane closure, I am in the left, and have been for some time and I’m supposed to just let the people over who purposefully ignored the sign. frick all that.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:21 pm to Richard Grayson
quote:
Richard Grayson
You dumb frick
Zipper merging only works when traffic is already flowing
Like on an interstate outside the state of louisiana
The act of skipping the line, in bottleneck traffic, does not constitute as zipper merging
Great idea, does not work!
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:27 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Listen, if a two lane highway is going from two lanes down to one, a slowdown is going to happen regardless because some vehicles will slow below the speed limit. But if everyone merges well before the lane closure, there should be minimal slowing. Throw in a couple of cars waiting until the end to merge, and you have people in the open lane having to slow to let them in. It just happens, people aren’t great drivers.
At any given speed, there is a safe following distance. If two lanes are filled with cars and all are following the prescribed safe distance, then no matter where the merge takes place the drivers will have to slow down to maintain that safe distance when the lanes are merged. Merging early or late will not affect this.
Your argument that early merging avoids slowdowns only works for sparse traffic with cars spaced apart greater than the minimum required safe distance. Once traffic density is high enough, a slow down is inevitable and zipper merging is more efficient and leads to order and reduced conflict as everyone should know where and when to expect the merge to occur.
This post was edited on 3/24/23 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:48 pm to GeauxTigerTM
I just take the open lane then get in when I get to front. Sometimes there is a dick trying to keep me from my rightful place in the que.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:53 pm to Richard Grayson
DOTD does a horrible job of promoting that technique
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:55 pm to Steadyhands
quote:
My pet peeve lately is that it seems everyone forgot how to turn off their brights. Flash them and they still just leave them on like a jackass.
People flash me all the time when my dim lights are actually on. Manufacturers make headlights too bright and my truck is all stock no aftermarket bulbs or leveling kit that could make it worse
Posted on 3/24/23 at 4:08 pm to ike221
quote:
The act of skipping the line, in bottleneck traffic, does not constitute as zipper merging
It’s not skipping the line, it’s using all available lane space.
Dumb Frick.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 4:31 pm to TCO
frick the line jumpers. Get in line and wait your turn heathen. Your time is not more valuable than mine.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 5:08 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Exactly. It’s common fricking sense.
You’re a fricking idiot. A selfish, narcissistic idiot.
Your solution of “I merge when I want and at that point, I’m not letting anyone else merge in front of me because my random selection of a merge point is the now official merge point” is the exact reason we have massive backups at merge points.
If you want move into the open lane two miles before the merge point, fine. But keep plenty of open space between you and the car in front so us competent drivers can merge over without a significant reduction in speed.
So dumb.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 5:40 pm to Richard Grayson
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 12:36 am
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:03 pm to TCO
quote:
It’s not skipping the line, it’s using all available lane space.
Dumb Frick.
It is, if there is bumper to bumper traffic
Go look at the gwrman recommended km per hour when they developed this technique
You dumb frick
Posted on 3/25/23 at 1:41 am to Richard Grayson
I merge when it's most convenient to do so. People that zipper merge usually race ahead til the last second and then daringly shoot the gap in such a way that causes someone to hit the brakes to avoid rear-ending them.
That's what causes slow downs in traffic. It's not the "early mergers" that are the problem. It's people that don't anticipate and bring traffic to a crawl by causing others to have to tap the brakes to avoid a collision which causes a rubber-band effect.
Edit: There's, "Using all available lane space," and driving like an a-hole. You know the ones. People should be considerate drivers, but that goes both ways. Letting people merge, but also not weaving in and out of lanes like it's a NASCAR race.
That's what causes slow downs in traffic. It's not the "early mergers" that are the problem. It's people that don't anticipate and bring traffic to a crawl by causing others to have to tap the brakes to avoid a collision which causes a rubber-band effect.
Edit: There's, "Using all available lane space," and driving like an a-hole. You know the ones. People should be considerate drivers, but that goes both ways. Letting people merge, but also not weaving in and out of lanes like it's a NASCAR race.
This post was edited on 3/25/23 at 1:47 am
Posted on 3/25/23 at 1:54 am to TigerTatorTots
quote:LINK
In theory, the “zipper merge” is a great idea. The road space in both lanes is utilized fully, and when it comes time to merge, people alternate and everyone gets where they’re going without a traffic jam. If everyone maintains a steady speed, leaves space between themselves and other cars, and everyone gets in at the last second, everyone wins. This was something I genuinely hoped to see succeed.
No plan survives contact with the enemy, though. I drove across four states that take different approaches to merging, and learned that the zipper merge doesn’t really work in the real world. It only leaves traffic stranded and idling on the interstate, creating a waste of time and increased pollution in its wake.

Posted on 3/25/23 at 2:07 am to Ingeniero
quote:No, no, no. A single conflict point is bad, and using the "full road storage" is bad.
What "everyone in one lane" adopters fail to realize is that at some point, everyone MUST move from the right lane to the left lane and by doing it willy-nilly, you create more conflict points. It's better to have it at one single point and use the full road storage up until that point.
If there is one conflict point where everyone merges, if it's going to be efficient then it has to work like clockwork. Everyone has to be on point and accelerate precisely right. This does not and will never happen, and trying to do this *causes* the "full road storage" situation. It creates a humongous conflict point, and every vehicle has to slow to a crawl or stop.
Merging early allows most vehicles to merge with no conflict at all. Just merge when you can. It's less of a bottleneck and more of a long funnel. And by the time the vehicles reach the choke point they are moving faster and keep things moving.
I don't know how these supposed studies and models were done which claim to prove zipper merge is best, but if one of the objectives is to treat the road as vehicle "storage" then it is flawed from the start. Roads are for moving cars, not storing them. Keeping cars moving requires speed, not precision merging.
Think about it like this, starting with 2 lanes jam packed at a dead stop for a mile. To simplify, the one open lane ahead is wide open, and there are no new vehicles adding to the back of the lines. What's the fastest way to clear this jam? Not the zipper merge, and not by a long shot. The fastest way is to tell everyone in the open lane to go as fast as they safely can go, then once that lane is empty tell the blocked lane to go ahead and move over and go as well. We can make it faster if those in the rear of the blocked lane start moving over and going as soon as they can instead of going in the present order. This would clear the jam much, much faster than a zipper merge. Why? Because we eliminated the damned choke point and pretended it was a 1 lane highway. The zipper merge not only maintains the choke point, but it forces every single fricking vehicle to deal with it at slow speed.
Now, of course things change if the single lane ahead is backed up, and we also have to consider what is happening behind the jam as well. But if we want raw efficiency at moving vehicles, we need more cars per second through the choke point and that requires speed. Zipper merge is far from ideal.
Posted on 3/25/23 at 5:06 am to Richard Grayson
Yea, that’s bullshite.
No way you’re going to tell me that instead of just merging while everyone is flowing nicely way in advance of the closure is incorrect.
I’m not saying that everyone should immediately merge at the first indication of an incoming closure but there should be an effort to make it happen instead of literally waiting to you have no where to go. The people that really piss me off are the ones that will be behind me in the open lane and try to pass In the other,get trapped and expect me to let them over. frick all of that!
I saw this a couple week ago on fb and immediately thought it was satire.
No way you’re going to tell me that instead of just merging while everyone is flowing nicely way in advance of the closure is incorrect.
I’m not saying that everyone should immediately merge at the first indication of an incoming closure but there should be an effort to make it happen instead of literally waiting to you have no where to go. The people that really piss me off are the ones that will be behind me in the open lane and try to pass In the other,get trapped and expect me to let them over. frick all of that!
I saw this a couple week ago on fb and immediately thought it was satire.
Posted on 3/25/23 at 5:15 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
So I think you give WAY too much credit to people going breakneck like it's turn 4 at talledega until the very last possible millisecond before forcing their way into the left where all of us have been for a while since we saw the sign that said "LANE CLOSED AHEAD, MERGE LEFT"
Every. Single. Day.
Posted on 3/25/23 at 5:23 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Sometimes there is a dick trying to keep me from my rightful place in the que.
It’s probably me. And “rightful “ is seriously questionable.
Popular
Back to top
