Started By
Message

re: A reminder that zipper merging is how your supposed to handle merging

Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
9466 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

How did that go?


The person on the other end of the phone sounded like she gave a shite, but who knows after the call ended.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
81687 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

We approach the right lane closure, I am in the left, and have been for some time and I’m supposed to just let the people over who purposefully ignored the sign. frick all that.

Yes
Posted by ike221
Loo A Vul
Member since Aug 2006
13852 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Richard Grayson


You dumb frick

Zipper merging only works when traffic is already flowing

Like on an interstate outside the state of louisiana

The act of skipping the line, in bottleneck traffic, does not constitute as zipper merging

Great idea, does not work!
Posted by ChEgrad
Member since Nov 2012
3566 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Listen, if a two lane highway is going from two lanes down to one, a slowdown is going to happen regardless because some vehicles will slow below the speed limit. But if everyone merges well before the lane closure, there should be minimal slowing. Throw in a couple of cars waiting until the end to merge, and you have people in the open lane having to slow to let them in. It just happens, people aren’t great drivers.


At any given speed, there is a safe following distance. If two lanes are filled with cars and all are following the prescribed safe distance, then no matter where the merge takes place the drivers will have to slow down to maintain that safe distance when the lanes are merged. Merging early or late will not affect this.

Your argument that early merging avoids slowdowns only works for sparse traffic with cars spaced apart greater than the minimum required safe distance. Once traffic density is high enough, a slow down is inevitable and zipper merging is more efficient and leads to order and reduced conflict as everyone should know where and when to expect the merge to occur.

This post was edited on 3/24/23 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
62807 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:47 pm to
Lol nah brah. You dumb
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
62807 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:48 pm to
I just take the open lane then get in when I get to front. Sometimes there is a dick trying to keep me from my rightful place in the que.
Posted by WMTigerFAN
Ouachita
Member since Feb 2005
4690 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:53 pm to
DOTD does a horrible job of promoting that technique
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
96763 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

My pet peeve lately is that it seems everyone forgot how to turn off their brights. Flash them and they still just leave them on like a jackass.


People flash me all the time when my dim lights are actually on. Manufacturers make headlights too bright and my truck is all stock no aftermarket bulbs or leveling kit that could make it worse
Posted by TCO
Member since Jul 2022
3261 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

The act of skipping the line, in bottleneck traffic, does not constitute as zipper merging


It’s not skipping the line, it’s using all available lane space.

Dumb Frick.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
18135 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 4:31 pm to
frick the line jumpers. Get in line and wait your turn heathen. Your time is not more valuable than mine.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
48702 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Exactly. It’s common fricking sense.


You’re a fricking idiot. A selfish, narcissistic idiot.

Your solution of “I merge when I want and at that point, I’m not letting anyone else merge in front of me because my random selection of a merge point is the now official merge point” is the exact reason we have massive backups at merge points.

If you want move into the open lane two miles before the merge point, fine. But keep plenty of open space between you and the car in front so us competent drivers can merge over without a significant reduction in speed.

So dumb.
Posted by LetTheTigerOut
Member since Dec 2019
764 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 5:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/28/23 at 12:36 am
Posted by ike221
Loo A Vul
Member since Aug 2006
13852 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:03 pm to
quote:


It’s not skipping the line, it’s using all available lane space.

Dumb Frick.


It is, if there is bumper to bumper traffic

Go look at the gwrman recommended km per hour when they developed this technique

You dumb frick
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
16198 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 12:58 am to
Your wrong
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
5745 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 1:41 am to
I merge when it's most convenient to do so. People that zipper merge usually race ahead til the last second and then daringly shoot the gap in such a way that causes someone to hit the brakes to avoid rear-ending them.

That's what causes slow downs in traffic. It's not the "early mergers" that are the problem. It's people that don't anticipate and bring traffic to a crawl by causing others to have to tap the brakes to avoid a collision which causes a rubber-band effect.

Edit: There's, "Using all available lane space," and driving like an a-hole. You know the ones. People should be considerate drivers, but that goes both ways. Letting people merge, but also not weaving in and out of lanes like it's a NASCAR race.
This post was edited on 3/25/23 at 1:47 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102302 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 1:54 am to
quote:

In theory, the “zipper merge” is a great idea. The road space in both lanes is utilized fully, and when it comes time to merge, people alternate and everyone gets where they’re going without a traffic jam. If everyone maintains a steady speed, leaves space between themselves and other cars, and everyone gets in at the last second, everyone wins. This was something I genuinely hoped to see succeed.

No plan survives contact with the enemy, though. I drove across four states that take different approaches to merging, and learned that the zipper merge doesn’t really work in the real world. It only leaves traffic stranded and idling on the interstate, creating a waste of time and increased pollution in its wake.
LINK

Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29000 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 2:07 am to
quote:

What "everyone in one lane" adopters fail to realize is that at some point, everyone MUST move from the right lane to the left lane and by doing it willy-nilly, you create more conflict points. It's better to have it at one single point and use the full road storage up until that point.
No, no, no. A single conflict point is bad, and using the "full road storage" is bad.

If there is one conflict point where everyone merges, if it's going to be efficient then it has to work like clockwork. Everyone has to be on point and accelerate precisely right. This does not and will never happen, and trying to do this *causes* the "full road storage" situation. It creates a humongous conflict point, and every vehicle has to slow to a crawl or stop.

Merging early allows most vehicles to merge with no conflict at all. Just merge when you can. It's less of a bottleneck and more of a long funnel. And by the time the vehicles reach the choke point they are moving faster and keep things moving.

I don't know how these supposed studies and models were done which claim to prove zipper merge is best, but if one of the objectives is to treat the road as vehicle "storage" then it is flawed from the start. Roads are for moving cars, not storing them. Keeping cars moving requires speed, not precision merging.


Think about it like this, starting with 2 lanes jam packed at a dead stop for a mile. To simplify, the one open lane ahead is wide open, and there are no new vehicles adding to the back of the lines. What's the fastest way to clear this jam? Not the zipper merge, and not by a long shot. The fastest way is to tell everyone in the open lane to go as fast as they safely can go, then once that lane is empty tell the blocked lane to go ahead and move over and go as well. We can make it faster if those in the rear of the blocked lane start moving over and going as soon as they can instead of going in the present order. This would clear the jam much, much faster than a zipper merge. Why? Because we eliminated the damned choke point and pretended it was a 1 lane highway. The zipper merge not only maintains the choke point, but it forces every single fricking vehicle to deal with it at slow speed.

Now, of course things change if the single lane ahead is backed up, and we also have to consider what is happening behind the jam as well. But if we want raw efficiency at moving vehicles, we need more cars per second through the choke point and that requires speed. Zipper merge is far from ideal.
Posted by Metariemobtiger
Mobile
Member since Aug 2019
537 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 5:06 am to
Yea, that’s bullshite.
No way you’re going to tell me that instead of just merging while everyone is flowing nicely way in advance of the closure is incorrect.

I’m not saying that everyone should immediately merge at the first indication of an incoming closure but there should be an effort to make it happen instead of literally waiting to you have no where to go. The people that really piss me off are the ones that will be behind me in the open lane and try to pass In the other,get trapped and expect me to let them over. frick all of that!

I saw this a couple week ago on fb and immediately thought it was satire.
Posted by This Far
Chicago
Member since Jul 2016
73 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 5:15 am to
quote:

So I think you give WAY too much credit to people going breakneck like it's turn 4 at talledega until the very last possible millisecond before forcing their way into the left where all of us have been for a while since we saw the sign that said "LANE CLOSED AHEAD, MERGE LEFT"

Every. Single. Day.
Posted by This Far
Chicago
Member since Jul 2016
73 posts
Posted on 3/25/23 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Sometimes there is a dick trying to keep me from my rightful place in the que.

It’s probably me. And “rightful “ is seriously questionable.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram