Started By
Message

re: 79-year-old accused of taking upskirt shots at LSU Barnes & Noble

Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:18 am to
Posted by John Cocktosten
Everywhere and Nowhere
Member since May 2016
418 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:18 am to
What movie is this from? I know I’ve seen it but can’t place it.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
175278 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:29 am to
Titanic
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
19195 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:30 am to
quote:

What movie is this from? I know I’ve seen it but can’t place it.


Pearl Harbor
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69416 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Saw a guy get caught doing this at the Bama game last year. Girl was going up the steps to her seat with her BF/Husband.


what was he caught doing...being a creep?
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
14045 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:40 am to
Posted by SmelvinRat
Slumwoody
Member since Oct 2015
1942 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:47 am to
It's John Candy's character in the movie Splash.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37678 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 8:03 am to
Voyeuristic Disorder DSM-5 Criteria

Voyeuristic Disorder is a paraphilic disorder characterized by persistent sexual arousal from observing unsuspecting people who are naked, undressing, or engaging in sexual activity. While many people may experience voyeuristic interests, the diagnosis of Voyeuristic Disorder requires that these urges and behaviors cause significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning or involve non-consenting individuals.

A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from observing an unsuspecting person who is naked, in the process of disrobing, or engaging in sexual activity, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors.

B. The individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

C. The individual experiencing the arousal and/or acting on the urges is at least 18 years of age.

Specify if:

In a controlled environment: This specifier is primarily applicable to individuals living in
institutional or other settings where opportunities to engage in voyeuristic behavior are restricted.

In full remission: The individual has not acted on the urges with a nonconsenting person, and there has been no distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning for at least 5 years while in an uncontrolled environment.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
31866 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 8:17 am to
Shooters shoot….
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
16251 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 8:29 am to
Taking pics up the girls skirt as she was going up the steps to her seat. His seat as on the end right against the steps. Her BF caught him. Police etc. came and they were looking through the guy's phone. I think they kicked him out from what I remember.
This post was edited on 9/9/25 at 8:30 am
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
36845 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Taking pics up the girls skirt as she was going up the stairs. Her BF caught him. Police etc. came and they were looking through the guy's phone. I think they kicked him out from what I remember.


Can the cops demand to look through your phone? I am not taking the creeper's side here, and I have never been a creeper myself, but I will be damned if anyone is going to go through my phone without a lawyer present.
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14497 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 8:46 am to
This is what really bothers me about these creeps....The system allows these repeat offenders to go back out there and live among the community as a protected species- and then whatta you know- they get caught doing it again.
The way it "should" be: 79 or not- control yourself or risk finding out you're never too old to learn how the hard way.
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
16251 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:10 am to
I don't remember exactly how it played out. Maybe the guy voluntarily let them look or it was security or something.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
9536 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:12 am to
After walking around campus on Saturday, I can confirm that there wasn't much covering up going on. Young girls don't leave much to the imagination these days. Ol baw just thought a mental image wasn't good enough and wanted to keep a few shots for later.
Posted by OffTheRails
Member since Apr 2025
65 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Can the cops demand to look through your phone?


Not without a search warrant. If an arrest, the phone should be sent to property and a request made to a judge to justify a search.
Posted by Yewkindewit
Near Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
21563 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:54 am to
From his perspective! “It’s the hunt, not the score!”……..
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
26689 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Shouldn’t have let him in Tiger Band
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:


Is really even a crime? Seems ok to me.


The question would seem to be what qualifies as video voyeurism? Is it a crime to sit on a bench and take photos of scantily clad women in an open and obvious setting? Or is it necessary to have done something out of the ordinary such as standing at the base of a stairwell and taking photos of women as they climb up the stairs?

Is it even a crime to take photos of conservatively dressed women in public places? Seems the ine between legal and illegal is a bit hazy.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
781 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

You think a 79-year-old dude taking upskirt pics at Barnes & Noble cares about what his granddaughter thinks? I'm sure she already knew Pee-Paw was different.


He probably has upskirt pics of his granddaughter.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34836 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Not without a search warrant. If an arrest, the phone should be sent to property and a request made to a judge to justify a search.


Even then you don’t have to give them the password
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 11:32 am to
I just don't understand these things sometimes.

Probably around 90% of females are going to be wearing underwear. Even if not, what are you really going to see?

If you're that hard up, you can Google plenty of celebrities or even watch porn, right on your phone. Or sit on a bench and watch women walk by in yoga pants. I just don't see the difference myself. It's not like a woman is gonna turn around and tell you that since you found it, you can have it.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram