Started By
Message

re: 74 years ago today we dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima

Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by ForLSU56
Rapides Parish
Member since Feb 2015
5582 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:18 pm to
My dad's unit was on the Japan invasion force list.

I have seen estimates run as high as 250,000 US casualties if we would have invaded Japan.

With the war in Europe over, the vast majority of US citizens wanted the killing US soldiers to stop ... the bombs allow that happen.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15271 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Where are they?


You have to be kidding.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
10109 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

 The Japanese felt they could save more face by surrendering under the guise of a new type of warfare


So you're saying the bombs ended the war by giving Japan a means out?
Posted by LPTReb
Member since Jul 2016
491 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

The battle of Iwo Jima pretty much convinced them to use the atomic bomb.

The death and destruction on that island was extrapolated out in a plan for the worst in the event of an invasion of mainland Japan.


There and Okinawa. It would have been bloody for sure. The 2 nukes and LeMay’s fire bombing campaign always catch criticism, but it’s not like we had tons of options. This should be a cautionary tale on what can happen when a population views their leader as infallible.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:49 pm to
People that like to say the Soviets had a hand in forcing surrender don't get that up until the end the Japanese military wanted a go.

Kyujo Incident - Coup Attempt
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:53 pm to
Posting from phone so I can’t quote the post I was agreeing with but it was pretty much in line with what you said.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
75747 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

The casualties pale in comparison to the invasion planned.

We made that arse quit.
My Pop would have been one of the casualties.

He was scheduled to die/get wounded on the Honshu Plain early in ‘46.

Then y’all wouldn’t have had the unique pleasure of my Internetian musings.

Thank the Oak Ridge Boys for the Füt!

Go to Hiroshima if you ever have the chance.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
140711 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 12:57 pm to
Unfortunate, but necessary.
Posted by Nawlens Gator
louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
5963 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 2:14 pm to

For sure, WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.

Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3748 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

You're comparing facts in a vacuum. The US had in recent days totally destroyed two cities and firebombed Tokyo. On top of taking Japanese homeland territory in Iwo Jima and Okinawa


I think it's more like the Soviet's were trying to get in on the action to get as much territory under their sway before the war ended. One of the other reasons we may have dropped the bombs was to show the soviets what we can do, and end the war before they can scoop up more territory. I've also heard they may have know we had a working bomb before we dropped it.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:18 pm to
When was the first Russian bomb? 47ish?

frickers are good at espionage.

49. With a program that started in 42 and only really got a serious push in 45 after ours fell.

This post was edited on 8/6/19 at 3:21 pm
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
27667 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

think we’re still issuing Purple Hearts that we’re made for the Japanese mainland invasion, unless we’ve finally gone through them.




Just placed an order not too long ago for first time since 1945
Posted by Athos
Member since Sep 2016
11878 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

What’s amazing is the bombs we dropped on Japan by today’s standards would be considered at best tactical nuclear bombs. The warheads we’d use on a city today dwarf the Japan bombs


Thus, MAD. Humans. Always good and inventive at killing. shite all at most other endeavors.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41561 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Always good and inventive at killing. shite all at most other endeavors.


You're so right. We've done nothing in the past few millennia to improve medicine and wellness, information sharing and recording, agricultural production, transportation, housing and everyday living conditions. Just stuck exactly where we were for ages. You really nailed this one with your cunning intellect.
Posted by Athos
Member since Sep 2016
11878 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

You're so right. We've done nothing in the past few millennia to improve medicine and wellness, information sharing and recording, agricultural production, transportation, housing and everyday living conditions. Just stuck exactly where we were for ages. You really nailed this one with your cunning intellect.


Jesus frick. Being able to spot when people are being facetious is quite difficult for you wankers, isn’t it?

The point was, if we put as much effort into building and improving society as a whole as we put into killing others on mass scales, we’d be a better off as a civilization. And that extends outside of the US.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19742 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

The point was, if we put as much effort into building and improving society as a whole as we put into killing others on mass scales


We already do this
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19825 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

The general consensus of WWII historians is that the 2 atomic bombs were not the primary reason for the surrender of the Japanese. The primary reason was Russia entering the war against them on the 9th of August.



Hardly. Some historians may hold that opinion but far from a concensus. Hirohito wasn't so concerned about the Russians declaring war, while also being weeks or months away from actually assembling a force to actually invade Japan, as he was about the atomic weapons. From his speech accepting the Potdam Declaration:

quote:

Moreover, the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should we continue to fight, not only would it result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization.



The ability to destroy cities by putting three bombers in the air was unthinkable compared to prevailing tactics of saturation bombing during that war.
This post was edited on 8/6/19 at 4:30 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178192 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Sad day for humanity. Nothing should have to come to this eve again.


Screw that. We should have dropped nukes on the Norks and Chinese when we were knocking on the Yalu River. It would have saved us 70 years of headache.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178192 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

The general consensus of WWII historians is that the 2 atomic bombs were not the primary reason for the surrender of the Japanese. The primary reason was Russia entering the war against them on the 9th of August.

Most historians are leftist anti-american soy boys who love sucking USSR commie cock.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
39627 posts
Posted on 8/6/19 at 4:46 pm to
74 years ago and it did all that. When the next one goes off God help no one will be safe
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram