- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 Boys Sweep Connecticut Girls Track and Field Championships
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:31 pm to Breesus
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:31 pm to Breesus
quote:
Awesome. I can't wait of trannies to start taking all the varsity starting positions and all the scholarships and then watch the SJWs eat each other.
At least this will put an end to the "women can compete with men" nonsense. They can't even compete with non-men.
2
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:32 pm to Breesus
Those brave black tweeners are just what the doctor ordered especially in a state like Connecticut. Libs are like fml.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:35 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
Those brave black tweeners are just what the doctor ordered especially in a state like Connecticut. Libs are like fml.
The thing that finished second this yr, won the 100m last yr, as a boy running against girls.
My question is, where was the winner from this yr, Terry, last yr?
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:40 pm to ThatMakesSense
i hoped thats not their track uniforms.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:42 pm to RB10
quote:
At least this will put an end to the "women can compete with men" nonsense.
That's the funniest thing about feminism.
"Men and women are completely equal in things!"
Um. No they're not.
Men are physically stronger and less agreeable.
Women are more compassionate and understanding.
This isn't a bad thing. It's why men and women work well together in pairs.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 4:52 pm to RB10
Lol! I wish I could give you 100 upvotes. Well said.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:24 pm to ThatMakesSense
Does anyone know their times, and what the winning times were in the same events for the boys state championships? Would be interesting to know.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:27 pm to GEAUXT
quote:
well who the frick are the other people that think this is okay
Most know it’s wrong. Just some are rightfully petrified of speaking against the PC machine
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:33 pm to crap4brain
Good! I'm waiting for some pasty white boy to win some scholarship set aside for minority females because he IDENTIFIES as a minority and female. Then sue the hell out of them for discrimination when they say he doesn't qualify.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:44 pm to upgrayedd
There is a level of unfairness here. I don't know how you fix it, but having boys compete as women will ultimately ruin women's sports.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:51 pm to Friar Tuck
quote:
Does anyone know their times, and what the winning times were in the same events for the boys state championships? Would be interesting to know.
The 100m was like a 12.66. Pretty sure that wouldn't have placed in the LA 5A girls championship.
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:57 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
My question is, where was the winner from this yr, Terry, last yr?
Terry, this year’s winner, was still competing as a male last year. In fact, he competed as a male in this year’s indoor track season (January-March). After getting his arse handed to him he conveniently decided to identify as female and compete as female despite not taking any treatments to reduce his natural T levels. It is a mother fricking sham.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:57 pm to Friar Tuck
Looked it up for myself.
Miller’s time for winning the “girls” 100m was 11.72, Yearwood finished second at 12.29. In the boys 100m finals, the winning time was 10.93, the last place finisher in the boy’s finals was 11.23.
Miller’s time for winning the “girls” 200m was 24.17, in the boys 200m finals the winning time was 21.92, the last place finisher at 15th in the boys 200m finals had a time of 23.35.
Not sure about “brave”. Seems more like degrading the girls championship to the level of a participation trophy. In the girls 100m finals, there were a couple of actual girls nipping at Yearwood’s heels in 3rd and 4th at 12.36 and 12.39. Feel bad for them training their butts off all year and having their event made a mockery.
The 12.66was Miller’s time in the prelims, the above times are from the finals.
Miller’s time for winning the “girls” 100m was 11.72, Yearwood finished second at 12.29. In the boys 100m finals, the winning time was 10.93, the last place finisher in the boy’s finals was 11.23.
Miller’s time for winning the “girls” 200m was 24.17, in the boys 200m finals the winning time was 21.92, the last place finisher at 15th in the boys 200m finals had a time of 23.35.
Not sure about “brave”. Seems more like degrading the girls championship to the level of a participation trophy. In the girls 100m finals, there were a couple of actual girls nipping at Yearwood’s heels in 3rd and 4th at 12.36 and 12.39. Feel bad for them training their butts off all year and having their event made a mockery.
The 12.66was Miller’s time in the prelims, the above times are from the finals.
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:58 pm to tigercross
quote:
Terry, this year’s winner, was still competing as a male last year. In fact, he competed as a male in this year’s indoor track season (January-March). After getting his arse handed to him he conveniently decided to identify as female and compete as female despite not taking any treatments to reduce his natural T levels. It is a mother fricking sham.
Link? I'm not against you. I'm happy you did the research, as this is exactly what I figured.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:04 pm to ThatMakesSense
Here ya go. It’s unsettled as to whether they underwent treatment this year, but at least one did not last year.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:06 pm to crap4brain
Did Rome have transgender gladiators just prior to the Empire collapsing?
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:06 pm to tigercross
Thank God for New Zealand having a voice of reason.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:12 pm to RougeDawg
quote:
Did Rome have transgender gladiators just prior to the Empire collapsing
Sucking dick and raping little boys was championed in Rome. Transgender gladiators would have been a huge draw.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:12 pm to upgrayedd
quote:But men and women are equal??
some say it's an unfair advantage and uneven playing field.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:29 pm to JJ27
quote:
Just because you identify as a boy, doesn't mean you should be able to actively take steroids and compete. So since it fails steroid tests, it should be automatically DQd
Bingo.
Cis males are barred from taking a long list of substances, even for therapeutic reasons. Same rule should apply to an FTM taking testosterone.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News