- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Ingram for an early 2nd, draft Guice
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:11 pm to tigerintexas777
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:11 pm to tigerintexas777
Ingram can pick up the blitz. If AK is not as good at it, then you can't even consider trading Ingram
0
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:42 pm to tigerintexas777
We already have a Guice: good up the middle, immaculate in open space, almost impossible to take down because of center of gravity, of good character and locker room presence, great work ethic.
In the meantime, keep what should be at least a couple more years of your hardnose, up-the-middle yet damned shifty running back who has good hands, too, and who is I believe the best back in the league after contact.
In the meantime, keep what should be at least a couple more years of your hardnose, up-the-middle yet damned shifty running back who has good hands, too, and who is I believe the best back in the league after contact.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:44 pm to tigerintexas777
Why all you m'fers so eager to get rid of Ingram?
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:49 pm to tigerintexas777
Troll - try again.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:49 pm to JPLIII
I think you can get a 3rd but not a 2nd.
Also Runningbacks don't break the bank. I would rather draft a player that while on his rookie contract saves us a huge amount of money.
I would not mind a OL, DL, or DE. If they are very good then they are saving us 10 million towards the cap. Even better is a qb on his rookie contract.
Also Runningbacks don't break the bank. I would rather draft a player that while on his rookie contract saves us a huge amount of money.
I would not mind a OL, DL, or DE. If they are very good then they are saving us 10 million towards the cap. Even better is a qb on his rookie contract.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:51 pm to tigerintexas777
quote:How about you go be stupid somewhere else??
Trade Ingram for an early 2nd, draft Guice
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:52 pm to JPLIII
quote:
Why all you m'fers so eager to get rid of Ingram?
His contract is up after this season and he’s nearing the age of RB decline.
We will need another RB whether it comes this year or next
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:55 pm to GynoSandberg
Other teams know that as well. We're not going to get the value in a draft pick that he's worth playing for us this year along side AK.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:02 pm to tigerintexas777
This is going to be the longest week on this forum!
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:08 pm to tigerintexas777
GO away moron.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:08 pm to tigerintexas777
I like it because Ingram will be due a new contract soon and Guice would be cheaper. Only problem is your not getting a 2nd for Ingram and Guice will be gone before 27.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:34 pm to JPLIII
quote:
Other teams know that as well. We're not going to get the value in a draft pick that he's worth playing for us this year along side AK.
This is correct.
And that's even if you wanted to trade Mark Ingram, which you don't.
This is clearly a troll, as the Saints backfield is one almost the entire NFL would kill for right now, and "draft the LSU player" is a hard trigger for this board.
and Mark Ingram is great.
and LSU fans are not the worst, not ALL of them just want to draft LSU players.
although...if I woke up tomorrow and Deion Jones was a Saint, I wouldn't complain.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:36 pm to tigerintexas777
frick no!!!! Ingram is a core player
Posted on 4/19/18 at 6:21 pm to ClientNumber9
quote:
The Rant's wet dream- trade the Bama back coming off his best year for an LSU player.
News flash, dumbass- you aren't getting a 2nd round pick for Mark Ingram.
Please someone tell the OP ranter to get off this board
Posted on 4/20/18 at 8:06 am to tigerintexas777
so tired of hearing Ingram's name, he's legit but F-it, i wouldn't mind if we traded him just to stop seeing these posts
Posted on 4/20/18 at 8:09 am to partywiththelombardi
quote:
Why didnt we sign Lael Collins
To be fair, this was a legitimate gripe, especially at the time.
Posted on 4/20/18 at 8:15 am to tigerintexas777
I like Guice but I’d like it more if you never posted anything this dumb again.
Posted on 4/20/18 at 8:30 am to ClientNumber9
quote:
you aren't getting a 2nd round pick for Mark Ingram.
Don't be so sure. Cleveland has 2 2nds and they really make poor decisions.
But seriously..
quote:
back coming off his best year
True. His last 2 years were by far his best. But he is entering his 8th year. Adrian Peterson had 8 good years (9 calendar years with 1 injury year) before he stopped being elite.
He has a few good years left. We'd save $4,600,000 against the cap but have $1,645,000 in dead money.
I like Ingram, but honestly we could get a back from draft that wouldn't be much of a drop off. and save us some money for the next 4 years.
Belichick has a philosophy of I'd rather get rid of people too soon than too late.
But, the only way i'm happy with it is if we get a good back to play behind Kamara.
To the point that he is more valuable on our roster than what we'd get for him? its true. Unless we find a steal, which is not likely.
This post was edited on 4/20/18 at 8:34 am
Posted on 4/20/18 at 8:35 am to tigerintexas777
Considering the average prime years for an NFL back, one coming into the final year of his contract, doesn't hurt to look into the future.
However, that's two reasons you're not going to get a ton of compensation for Ingram. He's an above average back but not an elite back and we'll probably be able to re-sign him at an affordable price.
However, that's two reasons you're not going to get a ton of compensation for Ingram. He's an above average back but not an elite back and we'll probably be able to re-sign him at an affordable price.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News