- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints have made calls about trading up in Rd 2
Posted on 4/24/26 at 2:26 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 4/24/26 at 2:26 pm to Chad504boy
Loomis called them not asking for a trade but wanting to know how much.
That info gets relayed from San Francisco or whoever to an insider when they asked who's calling. The Saints get mentioned and now they're magically getting reported about trading up. That's not the case.
Loomis said yesterday that three teams called about trading but it wasn't anything serious. It happens all the time
That info gets relayed from San Francisco or whoever to an insider when they asked who's calling. The Saints get mentioned and now they're magically getting reported about trading up. That's not the case.
Loomis said yesterday that three teams called about trading but it wasn't anything serious. It happens all the time
Posted on 4/24/26 at 2:32 pm to bonethug0180
Similar results, but would have to give up 132 instead of 150
SF would give up pick 33 & 90 for a total value of 225
Saints would give up picks 42, 73 & 132 for a total value of 225
Posted on 4/24/26 at 2:40 pm to ddbnsb
quote:
Emmanuel Pregnon
Of the players we all know, this is one I hope for. With that said, when do the Saints ever draft a player in the 2nd round that we all want? Their board is always different than ours.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 2:47 pm to Zephyrius
Glad to see Howell going twice in that AI mock
Come on fellas we can do better than fricking AI
Come on fellas we can do better than fricking AI
Posted on 4/24/26 at 3:12 pm to saints5021
quote:
2025 - Tyler Schough
2024 - Kool-Aid McKinstry
2023 - Isaiah Foskey
2022 - Alontae Taylor
2021 - Pete Werner
That group looks a lot better than I had thought.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 3:22 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Glad to see Howell going twice in that Al mock
Come on fellas we can do better than fricking Al
So did T.J Parker
Posted on 4/24/26 at 3:23 pm to Chad504boy
Top talent will be available at 42. I’m more interested in moving up with our 3rd. To late 2nd or very early 3rd.
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 4/24/26 at 3:31 pm to tzimme4
You are an awful poster bro
Posted on 4/24/26 at 3:32 pm to Mr Happy
quote:We rarely miss on our 1st and 2nd rounders, though there are obviously a few exceptions.
That group looks a lot better than I had thought.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 3:40 pm to Chad504boy
Saints are in the CB game RD2
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:20 pm to Chad504boy
Just don't let anyone jump us.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:31 pm to Chad504boy
Blah blah blah, we were supposedly trading up on Day 1 as well. Mute the noise
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:32 pm to Chad504boy
My prediction: Somebody hurt
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:34 pm to Believer504
quote:
Mute the noise
Why? It’s fun.
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:38 pm to bonethug0180
quote:Is it? That Hill chart never seems to match up. I think it is something in between the two now.
These values are from the outdated Jimmy Johnson chart. This one is much closer to today's values and is generally in the ball park (unless a team gets desperate and goes overboard):
LINK
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:55 pm to Chad504boy
Hopefully for Cassius Howell
Dude is a game wrecker
Dude is a game wrecker
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:52 pm to Chad504boy
And you're retarded, so congrats
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:55 pm to GynoSandberg
Get the giants' de with 3rd and cb with the 2nd
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:22 pm to NOSHAU
Picks at the top can skew value easily, but if you look at picks outside the top 10 is is closer than other value charts I have seen.
Often top 10 includes positions with a premium on them like QB, DE, OT, and CB. Because of that teams often get better than equal value. But trades not involving those premium positions tend to be more in line.
Bidding can also unexpectedly increase the value received, whereas if it's just one team offering it tends to fall more in line.
Often top 10 includes positions with a premium on them like QB, DE, OT, and CB. Because of that teams often get better than equal value. But trades not involving those premium positions tend to be more in line.
Bidding can also unexpectedly increase the value received, whereas if it's just one team offering it tends to fall more in line.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:24 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Top talent will be available at 42. I’m more interested in moving up with our 3rd. To late 2nd or very early 3rd.
I wouldn't be mad at that to go get someone they really like.
Popular
Back to top


1






