Started By
Message

Per Ian Rapoport: Saints decline Cesar Ruiz's fifth year option

Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:30 am
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32753 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:30 am
Swing and a miss on him.
This post was edited on 5/1/23 at 9:31 am
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17479 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:33 am to
I imagine it has more to do with the cost of that option vs the position than his performance.
Posted by Doug_H
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2013
2280 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Swing and a miss on him.


Doesn't mean that exactly. If he has a good year like he did last season stringing 2 consecutive progressing seasons then he will still likely be re-signed to a new deal, just won't be as hefty as the 5th year option price tag.
Posted by ODP
Conroe
Member since Oct 2015
1938 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:35 am to
Just like Josh Jacobs, right?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166249 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:36 am to
he's improved slightly and maybe there's still room for betterment but he's not worthy of top tier IOL money at all.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37069 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Per Ian Rapoport: Saints decline Cesar Ruiz's fifth year option
quote:

Swing and a miss on him.
His 5th year option was worth over $14 million and he’s coming off injury. No way the Saints were exercising the option, but it doesn’t mean more than that IMO. His play has continued to improve.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64341 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:40 am to
They do not believe he is worth that much money for one year or offering him a extended contract at this point. They also may see someone on the team who is not that far behind him skill wise who is dirt cheap. Seems in the next year we will have two new guards.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72012 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:52 am to
They drafted his cheap replacement in Saldiveri
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115790 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 9:52 am to
He had a good year last year.
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32959 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Saldiveri


I think that’s Peat’s replacement.

Ruiz had a bad first two years. He was pretty good last year. This year he hopefully puts it together and strings two good years back to back this year.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56295 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:13 am to
Shawn was hitting more than the bong that draft night
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64341 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:20 am to
Don't think he's ever played left side anything.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72012 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:41 am to
The option would be cheaper than a new deal, if Ruiz continues to improve and is actually good. If he’s not any good, you don’t want to bring him back


You could very well have two new guards next year. Some combo of Saldiveri/Penning/Hurst depending on who lands the tackle job
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:47 am to
if you go G in round 1, they should be day one impact starters not "well he was solid in year 3 compared to the first 2 atrocious years"

Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22425 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Shawn


Zjahn
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
19821 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:03 am to
This is price not performance
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71700 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:11 am to
Definite chance he’ll be back. I’ve been a bit of a Ruiz apologist, but I think it’s warranted.

2020- Covid, no real off-season, changed positions, rookie
2021- McCoy gets hurt in week 1, misses 5 weeks, Ruiz has to flip over to center
2022- First normal season, performs well

If he duplicates this season, he should be back at a fair price.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10920 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I imagine it has more to do with the cost of that option vs the position than his performance.


This..


The number I saw was 14 mil.

Not to say the Saints won't resign Ruiz but they're not locking in at that price.

Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166249 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Not to say the Saints won't resign Ruiz but they're not locking in at that price.


Because he’s not good enough to not risk losing him
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10920 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Because he’s not good enough to not risk losing him


But he's better and more reliable than Peat, who will also be gone next season.

I honestly thought Ruiz would be a prime trade piece during the draft. Ge would likely excel in his natural position at center but he's not unseating McCoy who ironically IMO would be just as good at the guard spot. Since we're starting with a new QB this season that would be the first thing I'd try out on camp and offseason training.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram