Started By
Message
locked post

Tari Eason allegedly not doing well in interviews.

Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:48 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130548 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:48 am
quote:

From Adam Spinella on intel that he’s hearing

“Eason is not impressing during the interview or film sessions of his meetings with teams. There’s a growing sense that his lack of feel is indicative of a fairly low basketball IQ.”


LINK
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:55 am to
quote:

From Adam Spinella on intel that he’s hearing

“Eason is not impressing during the interview or film sessions of his meetings with teams. There’s a growing sense that his lack of feel is indicative of a fairly low basketball IQ.”


This sounds like a team hoping he'll fall a little deeper into the first. That said, the LSU connection may keep me from melting too hard if he was picked at 8, but it would be tough. He's a potential trade-back target, but I think the chances of the Pelicans drafting him are exceedingly low.
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 11:58 am
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

There’s a growing sense that his lack of feel is indicative of a fairly low basketball IQ


I really don't know much about Eason, so he might not have good basketball instincts at all, but this feels like it got lost in translation from the rumor mill.

How do you get "lack of feel" from interviews? Nickeill could talk hoops, we saw how well that translated to the court. Dell Demps fell in love with Solomon Hill based on interviews, and Hill did talk basketball at a high level. I can't say he ever impressed me with his on court BBIQ. It certainly didn't match his off court knowledge.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

How do you get "lack of feel" from interviews? Nickeill could talk hoops, we saw how well that translated to the court. Dell Demps fell in love with Solomon Hill based on interviews, and Hill did talk basketball at a high level. I can't say he ever impressed me with his on court BBIQ. It certainly didn't match his off court knowledge.




I think they're talking about "lack of feel" from game tape. I can certainly agree that he sometimes didn't seem to get into the flow of games, and he certainly committed a lot of dumb fouls, so I could see the concern there, but this seems to be combining that with his interviews to call him dumb without using the word dumb.
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 12:08 pm
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
16011 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

I really don't know much about Eason, so he might not have good basketball instincts at all, but this feels like it got lost in translation from the rumor mill.


I think it's legit. Feel, instincts, IQ, etc etc.

You could probably make a 20 minute long highlight video of just bad fouls he committed last year. And I'm not talking getting vertical at the rim to contest, I'm talking picking up fouls under your own basket because you're trying to reach in when you already have 3-4 fouls sorts of stuff.

I'm a big LSU guy, but I've been against drafting Eason for some time. There's just something missing in regards to focus.
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 12:26 pm
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
13337 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 12:07 pm to
We screwed up NAWs development. We gave him way too much freedom right off the bat, Let him play PG/Lead Guard when he should have been boxed in, let him develop bad habits, and we put pressure on him too early on to produce when he wasn’t ready because of the need at the position.

He should have been boxed in as a 3 and D guard in the first couple of seasons and slowly given more freedom if he proved he can play his role efficiently.

I still think he can be a starting caliber guard in the league, he needs to be in a disciplined system.
Posted by saintslsupels
Member since Jul 2014
2492 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 1:13 pm to
Sometimes we make way too big of a deal of these things. This guy can guard 1-4 and some under sized centers, he’s REALLY good at scoring around the basket in traffic, and even started hitting 3s last year. Any decent coaching staff should be able to develop him. No offense to Will Wade but he’s never had a coach who can really develop talent
Posted by TGHub
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2008
2262 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

No offense to Will Wade but he’s never had a coach who can really develop talent

This is an odd thing to say considering Eason’s development into a potential lottery pick in the one season he played for Wade.
Posted by saintslsupels
Member since Jul 2014
2492 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 1:38 pm to
It had more to do with bad coaching and management at Cincinnati and good talent evaluation from Will Wade. My point is a good coaching staff would feel confident they can develop Tari while a bad one would pass on him for a less talented player that seems easier to coach.
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
19468 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

This guy can guard 1-4 and some under sized centers, he’s REALLY good at scoring around the basket in traffic, and even started hitting 3s last year.


I watched just about every LSU game. He has no left hand, extremely slow/ugly release, and is very low IQ defensively.

He has a high ceiling IMO, but his floor is pretty low
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
16011 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 2:15 pm to
I would also add while he's labeled as a guy who can defend 1-4, he's not that in terms of Herb or Sochan in this class. You don't want him consistently switching onto guards, for example.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
49404 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

but this seems to be combining that with his interviews to call him dumb without using the word dumb.

exactly
they are saying that he's stupid

and let me just say this...not everyone is smart enough to do every job. we all know stupid people. i'm not sure why this issue has to be danced around. NBA play obviously requires some level of intelligence.
Posted by smoke225
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
7965 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 2:49 pm to
Personally i was never really impressed with Eason. Like stated above he cant go left and commits very stupid fouls
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
16627 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Personally i was never really impressed with Eason


Agreed. Was liable to disappear offensively and commit bad fouls.

Don’t think he had any business being a one-and-done. I’m not even that upset about him not being at LSU. Just think it would have been better for his game to either stay or hit the portal.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34623 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:02 pm to
I believe it's true also.

If you watched him play at lsu this isn't a surprise.

Does it really matter in the long run?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37216 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Does it really matter in the long run?

Definitely, I want high IQ players with “feel for the game” on the roster. Especially with Willie’s .5 system that he’s implemented. Players like Daniels and Sochan who have basketball IQ are a much better fit than players like Eason, who may not “get it”.
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8795 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:10 pm to
I agree that Tari’s game can be a bit ugly at times. Does he have flaws? For sure. For all the feel for the game comments:

6.6 fouls drawn/40, 15th in the nation
4.5 steal percentage, 12th in the nation
6.2 block percentage, 102nd in the nation

Creating turnovers as a help defender? That requires feel. Drawing fouls on your defender (especially as a 6’7” guy who can “only go right”)? That requires feel for the game. Tari does some things really well. It’s easy to focus on what he struggles with and not what he does well.
Posted by PigDog33
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2021
995 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

We screwed up NAWs development.


Or - NAW was just not very good. Outside of occasional scoring burst he didn’t have much going for him.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6574 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:31 pm to
Or maybe he’s a good athlete with low bball IQ and not a top 10 pick. Anything can happen on draft day but I can’t see a surprise with guys like Eason. Teams will take a chance on the potential of Griffin, Sochan, Duren, Agbaji before Eason. That’s not including the Sharpe, Davis, Daniels, Mathurin group that is looking to be picked anywhere 5-10 right now.

I’m not saying Eason won’t crack say the top 12 but there are about 13-14 guys getting all the momentum going into this draft and the margin of error looks slim for anyone else to slide in the top 10 over those guys. I just don’t see the surprise because all those guys could go 8-15 already. IMO the biggest surprise would be Mark Williams making the top 10 and it’s really not that surprising considering his size and the lack thereof being drafted before him.
Posted by baytiger11
Member since Jul 2020
2516 posts
Posted on 6/10/22 at 6:52 am to
This is not really surprising. He always hustled and played with a very high motor, but he would commit some boneheaded fouls.

And his offensive game is not refined. He hit a few threes at LSU, but for the most part if he wasn't being fed the ball under the goal or grabbing a rebound for a jam, he had a hard time scoring.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram