- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stein: Pels said to be 1 of teams willing to move out of top 10 for “win now” compensation
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:22 pm to Kerchek
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:22 pm to Kerchek
quote:
Why is everyone so quick to move Hayes?
Bc they still haven’t learned. Him and Nance will be really fun bench big men.
If anyone needs to roll it’s Graham to make room for Kira minutes.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:30 pm to Kerchek
quote:
Why is everyone so quick to move Hayes?
He averaged 61/35/76 and he's only just turned 22. He's progressively gotten better and he's still freakishly athletic.
Why sell when his value is so low?
What do we do if he has another marginal improvement next year? He'll want $20M/year and we can't afford that.
He'll be entering RFA and teams know we won't/can't match (like with Lonzo). That's a best case scenario.
He may not really get much run next year if Zion is healthy b/c we also have Nance. His value could plummet.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:31 pm to lil 7thward
quote:
The light comes on for different players at different times. People here have already written off Jax and Kira.
Are you willing to pay him $15-20M/year over 3-4 years to hope the light comes on?
I like Hayes but the CJ trade made Hayes too expensive. He has to be a legit 18/8 guy who can shoot 3s and play great D to be worth it for us, and does anyone expect that next year? I mean it would be awesome, but it's highly unlikely.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:33 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
There was no reason to move down that draft. And really depending on who is there when we pick this year, absolutely no reason to drop 4 spots this draft. I was right the last time I said it was a mistake and we should have taken Garland.
I wanted Garland in that draft too, but in this draft if it’s the choice of Daniels at 8 or Sochan and an asset at 12, give me option 2 all day.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:35 pm to Epic Cajun
I don't get why people are so confident Sochan will be there at 12
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’m not 100% convinced of it, but one of:
Sochan
Griffin
Duren
Davis
Will be there
Sochan
Griffin
Duren
Davis
Will be there
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
I agree
Which is why if you believe in him, why risk it?
To me moving back only makes sense if there are like 2-3 players like last year that we felt could have the same impact.
Which is why if you believe in him, why risk it?
To me moving back only makes sense if there are like 2-3 players like last year that we felt could have the same impact.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:48 pm to Bronc
quote:
To me moving back only makes sense if there are like 2-3 players like last year that we felt could have the same impact.
I mean moving back makes sense if we get a guy like Lou Dort in exchange, but yeah, otherwise...not worth the risk if we really like Sochan.
I mean if we got Dort and ended up with Johnny Davis I'd do backflips, though.
*ETA: or Duren/Williams/Griffin
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:04 pm to Bronc
quote:
To me moving back only makes sense if there are like 2-3 players like last year that we felt could have the same impact.
Didn't we move back last year and it work out?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:08 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Sochan and an asset at 12
That’s cool in theory, but what do you do if he’s gone, which is very likely. Nothing is promised.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:11 pm to Townedrunkard
Dieng gang
Also if OKC wants that 8th pick so badly then give me the houston pick in 2024
Also if OKC wants that 8th pick so badly then give me the houston pick in 2024
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Was just listening to a podcast with a former GM and he mentioned teams screwing themselves by trading back for guys that don't end up being there.
I agree, I don't get why people are assuming Sochan will be there at 12.
For all we know, this is why we ended up with Hayes in the first place. Griffin traded the 4th pick hours before the draft even started.
I agree, I don't get why people are assuming Sochan will be there at 12.
For all we know, this is why we ended up with Hayes in the first place. Griffin traded the 4th pick hours before the draft even started.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:13 pm to brmark70816
quote:
Didn't we move back last year and it work out?
It was absolutely necessary to get off the horrible Adams debacle. An upgrade to our starting 5 isn’t necessary by trading down this year. Need to draft the best available now.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:15 pm to eyeran
quote:
I agree, I don't get why people are assuming Sochan will be there at 12.
He's 12 or lower in most mocks, but 100% of mocks are garbage after the first few picks every single year.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:26 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
If you don’t make future moves because you’ve made mistakes in the past you shouldn’t have the job of managing a basketball roster
If you trade down yet again, knowing that type of move historically never works out well for the team trading down in the draft, then maybe you shouldn’t have the job of managing the roster.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:45 pm to TeddyPadillac
Worked out decently well last season, no?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:46 pm to TeddyPadillac
What is a win now type move?
CJ, BI, Herb, and Zion have to be 100% locked in as starters. I can’t imagine bringing someone in that makes sense to displace one of them from heavy starter minutes.
The only starter type move I could see is a chang in philosophy away from JV
Also someone like Dort was a starter and is due for a contract. Is he really going to want a bench role.
Guys like Alvaraedo, Murphy, and Nance will be bought into the idea of a rotation guy. I think we need to keep stacking young cheap talent that will be cool with a rotation spot in the near term. This is an opportunity to get a more for sure thing instead of the gamble of later picks that playoff teams are stuck with.
We need to take our guy at 8.
CJ, BI, Herb, and Zion have to be 100% locked in as starters. I can’t imagine bringing someone in that makes sense to displace one of them from heavy starter minutes.
The only starter type move I could see is a chang in philosophy away from JV
Also someone like Dort was a starter and is due for a contract. Is he really going to want a bench role.
Guys like Alvaraedo, Murphy, and Nance will be bought into the idea of a rotation guy. I think we need to keep stacking young cheap talent that will be cool with a rotation spot in the near term. This is an opportunity to get a more for sure thing instead of the gamble of later picks that playoff teams are stuck with.
We need to take our guy at 8.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:07 pm to Colonel Flagg
Is Herb considered a starter or a 6th man?
He is definitely a closer for us as a lockdown defender but he isn’t necessarily a starter, especially depending on who we would bring in at the 1 or 2.
CJ can play the point if we have a big 2 or he can play the 2 if we have a point who is big enough to guard guys he can’t defend well.
And that still allows Herb to be one of the first guys off the bench as well as our defensive anchor.
He is definitely a closer for us as a lockdown defender but he isn’t necessarily a starter, especially depending on who we would bring in at the 1 or 2.
CJ can play the point if we have a big 2 or he can play the 2 if we have a point who is big enough to guard guys he can’t defend well.
And that still allows Herb to be one of the first guys off the bench as well as our defensive anchor.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:15 pm to teke184
IMO, Herb has to be a starter. He’s the only starter that is a plus defender. We need more defender minutes, not fewer. I would replace Jonas before Herb in the starting lineup (not that I think that is going to happen either).
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:16 pm to Colonel Flagg
quote:
What is a win now type move?
I would take this as a bad signals analysis rather than hard evidence that the Pels are looking for Win Now trades. It probably means OKC is offering to bundle their worst picks to move up and teams start asking them about players like Dort instead because the picks suck. That gets translated to the Pels aren't looking for more picks so they are looking to "win now".
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News