- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Stein: Pels said to be 1 of teams willing to move out of top 10 for “win now” compensation
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:22 pm
6
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:39 pm to Fun Bunch
Possible targets?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:41 pm to Fun Bunch
Hayes and 8 for 22 and Bane
One can dream
One can dream
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:43 pm to Fun Bunch
I think it will either be Daniels at 8 or trade back with OKC and take sochan
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:51 pm to cgrand
If we are somewhat confident that Sochan will be there at 12, we would be silly to pass up the opportunity to pick up an asset by moving back only 4 spots.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:54 pm to Epic Cajun
I don’t think a “win now compensation” is doable with a 4 spot move back. Chances are it would be #8, Graham, Hayes?, Kira? for an actual starting level player. Brogdon/ Sexton types.
Lol at anyone thinking we would move back for a salary dump. This is an obvious take and our options are pick at #8 or add a player to help us compete immediately. The tax is irrelevant if we are competing for championships.
Lol at anyone thinking we would move back for a salary dump. This is an obvious take and our options are pick at #8 or add a player to help us compete immediately. The tax is irrelevant if we are competing for championships.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:58 pm to Dantheman504
if the opportunity to move hayes or graham is there you have to at least consider it. If there’s a better offer then obviously they’ll take it.
going to be interesting
going to be interesting
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:05 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
#8, Graham, Hayes?, Kira? for an actual starting level player. Brogdon/ Sexton types.
I can see them aiming higher like that, I was thinking it meant we wanted something like Micic/Dort more than more future 1sts. Or maybe 13 and a player from Charlotte rather than 15.
It feels like 16 and Huerter is falling back too far to get any of the guys we've been talking about the last few months.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:06 pm to TigerinATL
Graham and the first for kcp and wiz first leggo
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:07 pm to cgrand
quote:
I think it will either be Daniels at 8 or trade back with OKC and take sochan
You’d think one of Mathurin or even Murray might fall to us. We need to stay put.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:15 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
we would be silly to pass up the opportunity to pick up an asset by moving back only 4 spots
Yea it worked out perfectly last time we only moved down 4 spots and picked up another asset…..
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:17 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Graham and the first for kcp and wiz first leggo
If Daniels and mathurin are both gone and Sharpe is staring us in the face, I’d probably be ok with this. But I think I’d still probably just take the gamble on him.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:27 pm to TigerinATL
I think #8, #41, #52 and Graham for Dort, #12, and #31 is on the lower end of what we want to do. I’d rather throw in a future 1st/ swap for a higher coveted player. (no offense to Dort and I think he’d be great for our team).
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:29 pm to cgrand
Why is everyone so quick to move Hayes?
He averaged 61/35/76 and he's only just turned 22. He's progressively gotten better and he's still freakishly athletic.
Why sell when his value is so low?
He averaged 61/35/76 and he's only just turned 22. He's progressively gotten better and he's still freakishly athletic.
Why sell when his value is so low?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:31 pm to Kerchek
Banking on him not taking a step this coming season where he’s valuable enough to resign at his asking price. I would think the likelihood of him being moved prior to the trade deadline is incredibly high.
More importantly, I think his value is low, if he played for someone else what would you be willing to give up for him?
More importantly, I think his value is low, if he played for someone else what would you be willing to give up for him?
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:31 pm to Kerchek
Because he has one year left on his deal and we aren’t going to sign him. Not to mention he’s proven not to be able to handle the center position, and beyond his numbers, still finds a way to make enough negative plays to hurt the team.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:50 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Yea it worked out perfectly last time we only moved down 4 spots and picked up another asset…..
If you don’t make future moves because you’ve made mistakes in the past you shouldn’t have the job of managing a basketball roster.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:59 pm to Epic Cajun
I agree with you. The point he’s making is that we tried to go 2 for 1 knowing they wouldn’t contribute immediately. It’s not worth it for this draft. If we have someone 1-8 that we trust will have a large impact now then we do it. Or trade the pick for a proven player that will have a large impact now.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:20 pm to Kerchek
quote:I believe in Hayes. As AD said, growth isn't linear. The light comes on for different players at different times. People here have already written off Jax and Kira.
Why is everyone so quick to move Hayes?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 6:21 pm to Epic Cajun
There was no reason to move down that draft. And really depending on who is there when we pick this year, absolutely no reason to drop 4 spots this draft. I was right the last time I said it was a mistake and we should have taken Garland.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 6:22 pm
Page 1 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News