- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So who has more trade value currently, Murray or BI?
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:49 am
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:49 am
We just saw that Murray went for two firsts and a former lotto pick. Some Hawks fans think they got back about 90 cents in the dollar for what they paid for him lots of it depend on where the Lakers pick land. So we basically paid three first round picks.
I wonder if BI could bring back that in a trade right now. And his position is more in demand than a point guard.
I wonder if BI could bring back that in a trade right now. And his position is more in demand than a point guard.
9
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:56 am to Townedrunkard
Ingram no doubt if not keep him
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:56 am to Townedrunkard
Probably about the same still.
Kessler + (2) picks
Dyson + (2) picks
Not that far off 3-4 1st
Kessler + (2) picks
Dyson + (2) picks
Not that far off 3-4 1st
Posted on 6/29/24 at 10:08 am to Townedrunkard
Ingram by far
As I’ve been saying
As I’ve been saying
Posted on 6/29/24 at 10:41 am to Townedrunkard
I remember when Hawks fans were asking for BI and multiple firsts.
Posted on 6/29/24 at 10:58 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Some Hawks fans think they got back about 90 cents in the dollar for what they paid for him lots of it depend on where the Lakers pick land
It’s all about the lakers pick. Thats the only real asset sent out.
And it’s potentially a good one. Lakers will struggle to avoid the lottery in the west this year, and it’s a loaded draft.
Posted on 6/29/24 at 11:05 am to ned nederlander
How can you even say that when free agency hasn't even started. Until you know what their supporting casts looks like, there's no way to tell how good they will be. And that's the only reason why that pick still hold good value because it's the off-season.
Posted on 6/29/24 at 11:10 am to ned nederlander
quote:we’ve said this for most years and they turn out to do alright. Plus they’ll have 2-3 first to trade if they want a third star. Up to them if they actually want to compete
And it’s potentially a good one. Lakers will struggle to avoid the lottery in the west this year, and it’s a loaded draft.
Posted on 6/29/24 at 11:16 am to ned nederlander
Lakers will have father and son superpowers this season.
Posted on 6/29/24 at 11:28 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
and a former lotto pick
Context needs to be applied here.
Posted on 6/29/24 at 11:42 am to Broski
If Paul George doesn’t work out for the warriors, I wonder if they would pivot to BI
Posted on 6/29/24 at 12:08 pm to MasterAbe1
Whichever one commits to shooting the 3.
Otherwise they are both two long perimeter players approaching 30 who primarily score through midrange buckets and provide inconsistent defensive effort - so flip a coin.
For me, it’s Murray because I think his defense next to a guy like Herb could reach its potential, and his contract isn’t a team killer.
Otherwise they are both two long perimeter players approaching 30 who primarily score through midrange buckets and provide inconsistent defensive effort - so flip a coin.
For me, it’s Murray because I think his defense next to a guy like Herb could reach its potential, and his contract isn’t a team killer.
Posted on 6/30/24 at 12:54 pm to Townedrunkard
We just traded for Murray, a guy Griff has coveted for a couple years now. He’s not going anywhere. We need to turn BI into Walker Kessler and Jonathan Isaac which would greatly free up some money and give you our starting and backup centers. The rookie would be the 3rd center his rookie year playing a lot in the G league.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 10:36 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
So who has more trade value currently, Murray or BI?
Atlanta wouldn't even give up Capella for Ingram. All this bragging about getting Murray without giving up Ingram, but in reality, Atlanta wouldn't do any deal that included them taking Ingram.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:12 am to ned nederlander
quote:
It’s all about the lakers pick. Thats the only real asset sent out.
And it’s potentially a good one. Lakers will struggle to avoid the lottery in the west this year, and it’s a loaded draft
Has to give them something back to get Murray. I bet it ends up being around pick 15.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:14 am to mhasen1
quote:
Atlanta wouldn't even give up Capella for Ingram. All this bragging about getting Murray without giving up Ingram, but in reality, Atlanta wouldn't do any deal that included them taking Ingram.
You don't really believe this. Do you?
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:14 am to mhasen1
quote:
Atlanta wouldn't even give up Capella for Ingram. All this bragging about getting Murray without giving up Ingram, but in reality, Atlanta wouldn't do any deal that included them taking Ingram.
Yeah that sounds some Atlanta BS. More like we didn’t want just Capela for Ingram. Atlanta trying to justify why they didn’t get Ingram back in the Murray trade.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:42 am to Chalkywhite84
quote:
You don't really believe this. Do you?
Once the draft order is set, the offers for Ingram will start coming.
Griffin is waiting until the draft to make the move.
Teams are waiting on Paul George, then they will pivot to Ingram.
With George and Butler off of the market, teams will be desperate and Griffin can drive a hard bargain.
The teams that were after Bridges will now pivot to Ingram.
Now that Anunoby is signed, teams will turn to Ingram.
Detroit needs to hit the salary floor.
Everyone is just waiting on a potential Markannen deal, then Ingram will be the focus.
The Kings are desperate, Griffin can bleed them.
Ingram is the best available wing left.
I can't believe the Cavs preferred Cam Johnson. <--- You are here.
The Jazz are crazy for giving up that for Lavine. Griffin must be asking for everything.
Jerami Grant's deal doesn't look that bad with the cap rising. If Robert Williams can stay healthy, this will look like a steal. The first we gave with Ingram will be in the 20s anyway.
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 11:43 am
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:48 am to mhasen1
People just can't admit that Ingram completely destroyed his value so thoroughly.
He was such dog shite when he came back that all of his flaws are now exposed.
I remember a time people laughed at some of us saying Derozan was better or that Ingram was closer to Kuzma/Grant/Lavine level guys than what he was believed to be on here.
He was such dog shite when he came back that all of his flaws are now exposed.
I remember a time people laughed at some of us saying Derozan was better or that Ingram was closer to Kuzma/Grant/Lavine level guys than what he was believed to be on here.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:53 am to ghost2most
quote:
People just can't admit that Ingram completely destroyed his value so thoroughly. He was such dog shite when he came back that all of his flaws are now exposed.
For me its whats best for the team even if we dont get full value for BI. Say we keep Ingram- not only do we have a shitty center situation but now we’re sending CJ AND Trey to the bench. How does that affect negotiations with Trey? What about CJ? Most posters have stated he’ll never come off the bench.
The hope is BI increases his value but no one looks at the other side- what if BI gets injured or plays even worse- his value will be even less.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News