- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I tried to tell you guys about Brandon Ingram last year.
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:26 pm
Giving him the max was a top 5 worst decision this franchise has made.
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:29 pm to BayouRat15
I was saying the same thing last season but also you can just let a guy who averages 25ppg walk either so the pels were pretty much screwed
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:30 pm to BayouRat15
That's stupid because right now, you can trade him and get a good bit of assets back. Regardless of his financial cost right now (i.e. his max).
Now if it was his 2nd max contract where its similar to CP3, westbrook's, etc...yeah you'd have to reconsider.
As it stands, he needs to continue to grow or we gotta figure it out.
Now if it was his 2nd max contract where its similar to CP3, westbrook's, etc...yeah you'd have to reconsider.
As it stands, he needs to continue to grow or we gotta figure it out.
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:31 pm to htran90
Bayou Rat is a moron. Best to just ignore his takes
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:35 pm to BayouRat15
quote:
Giving him the max was a top 5 worst decision this franchise has made.
Stupid as usual.
We could trade him today for a kings ransom if we wanted to, which makes it a great deal.
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:36 pm to BayouRat15
I'm not a fan of his game but this is a bad take. You now have a tradeable asset at least.
Posted on 3/12/21 at 1:01 pm to Fun Bunch
Fun Bunch glad to see you back
Posted on 3/16/21 at 11:42 pm to BayouRat15
Bump it all you want. You’re still a frickin moron and this take still frickin sucks.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 11:43 pm to BayouRat15
Bump to show you’re still a dumbass? Guy is only 23.
He scored 30 points 6 rebounds 2 assists. 10/22 fgs. Even though he chokes at the end of the game, he didn’t even hit his prime yet and will get better each year
He scored 30 points 6 rebounds 2 assists. 10/22 fgs. Even though he chokes at the end of the game, he didn’t even hit his prime yet and will get better each year
This post was edited on 3/16/21 at 11:44 pm
Posted on 3/16/21 at 11:44 pm to BayouRat15
You are a shite poster. Yeah he’s bad in the clutch right now, but he also had 30 and was the main reason we were up in the first place. Kids got an issue, it’s something he needs to work through, but wanting to get rid of him is fricking insane.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 11:46 pm to BobBarker
You and the others quit talking about him being young. That's not his issue.
For him to be making 30mllion year you have too be clutch and not choke
For him to be making 30mllion year you have too be clutch and not choke
Posted on 3/16/21 at 11:54 pm to BayouRat15
You’re a joke. You’re telling me a guy who only played 5 years that improved each year, won’t keep improving because that’s just who he is? That’s why organizations rather invest in prospects than aging players.
Your mentality is like Dell Demps. Get guys who are what they are instead of investing in guys who can turn into great players.
Your mentality is like Dell Demps. Get guys who are what they are instead of investing in guys who can turn into great players.
Posted on 3/17/21 at 12:02 am to BayouRat15
I’ve seen some bad bumps in my day but woof
Posted on 3/17/21 at 2:00 am to htran90
Griff would trade him for 5 picks in the 2nd round over the next 10 years
Posted on 3/17/21 at 2:12 am to BayouRat15
Please stop posting on here. You bring no value
Posted on 3/17/21 at 7:45 pm to Macintosh504
He is an outstanding scorer. He's going to put up great numbers. But Julius Randle does that. And the Lakers got better without both of them. BI will become a more efficient offensive player. Right now the ball sticks to his hand offensively. This is his 5th NBA season and he hasn't sniffed the playoffs. He's a scorer but not a great player at this point.
Posted on 3/17/21 at 8:04 pm to Kenja
The Lakers definitely got better because they lost Randle and Ingram, not because they got LeBron and AD. Nope, nothing to do with that.
Posted on 3/17/21 at 8:26 pm to Kenja
quote:
the Lakers got better without both of them
Holy fricking fallacy, Batman.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News