- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2022-23 Lakers Thread
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:05 am to TigerinATL
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:05 am to TigerinATL
Man this season is going to be so interesting and fun to watch. Our explosion and hopefully their implosion. All the possibilities. Here’s to hoping for good health
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:10 am to TigerinATL
at minimum the chances that both the pels and the lakers make the playoffs seems remote.
if lakers make/pels miss pels get a lottery pick
if the opposite, pels get a lottery pick
if they both miss, pels get a lottery pick
if they both make, pels get the better of the two non lottery picks
with the 24/25 unprotected pick still to go
if lakers make/pels miss pels get a lottery pick
if the opposite, pels get a lottery pick
if they both miss, pels get a lottery pick
if they both make, pels get the better of the two non lottery picks
with the 24/25 unprotected pick still to go
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:22 am to TigerinATL
Yes, I honestly think that the pick could end up around #8 again. We know that LeBron, Davis, and Westbrook will all be a year older and less athletic. We know that they will not stay healthy. We know that ring-chasers are not going to flock to play with them, so the rest of their roster likely won't be as good as last season's. It remains to be seen if Malik Monk is serious when he says that he'll consider returning to the Lakers for $6 million when he could get considerably more elsewhere -- maybe there's a role for him in Space Jam 3 or something.
But, aside from Kendrick Nunn being healthy, there's no reason to think that anything will be better for the Lakers this season. LeBron is 37 years old, and Father Time is undefeated -- it's time to expect a significant decline in his play.
But the people saying that we should expect a top-5 pick are just wrong. The teams finishing with bottom-5 records are almost always teams that tanked to some degree, and there's no reason for the Lakers to tank. So, unless they hit in the lottery for us, a reasonable expectation is to end up with a pick in the same range as #8 again.
But, aside from Kendrick Nunn being healthy, there's no reason to think that anything will be better for the Lakers this season. LeBron is 37 years old, and Father Time is undefeated -- it's time to expect a significant decline in his play.
But the people saying that we should expect a top-5 pick are just wrong. The teams finishing with bottom-5 records are almost always teams that tanked to some degree, and there's no reason for the Lakers to tank. So, unless they hit in the lottery for us, a reasonable expectation is to end up with a pick in the same range as #8 again.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:28 am to GOP_Tiger
Nah, I believe
BI/Zion/Wembanyama about to run the league via that Lakers pick!
BI/Zion/Wembanyama about to run the league via that Lakers pick!
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:41 am to TigerinATL
Ifeel like the pels at worst will be in the same tier Denver and Utah were this year at about 50 wins. That is roughly the 22nd pick.
If Lakers are at around 40 wins that puts them either late lottery or if they somehow make the playoffs mid teens.
That's a 7 to possibly 10 pick jump.
If Lakers are at around 40 wins that puts them either late lottery or if they somehow make the playoffs mid teens.
That's a 7 to possibly 10 pick jump.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:46 am to LosLobos111
Guys, we don't have to swap with the Lakers if they're worse. It's just an option
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 7:47 am
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:39 am to GOP_Tiger
Expect top 5? No. But it is a distinct possibility if last year’s lower tier teams decidedly improve, like Houston and Detroit, while fewer teams are tanking.
Only team actively getting worse at the second are the Spurs.
Only team actively getting worse at the second are the Spurs.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:47 am to teke184
I have a hard time believing the Lakers will be bad again.
Peak comedy would be the Lakers making the play-in, winning game 1, losing game 2...then winning the lottery.
Peak comedy would be the Lakers making the play-in, winning game 1, losing game 2...then winning the lottery.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:52 am to Fun Bunch
Them being better than last year means shipping out Westbrick for talent, either supporting cast along the lines of Hield or another “star” whose value has tanked.
Top 5 is a possibility with them running it back and having limited new talent come in due to lack of cap space and a lack of ring chasers willing to sign on minimums.
Top 5 is a possibility with them running it back and having limited new talent come in due to lack of cap space and a lack of ring chasers willing to sign on minimums.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:57 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I have a hard time believing the Lakers will be bad again.
I don’t. Games played the last 3 years
LeBron
56
45
67
IIRC 67 was actually a decent amount of games because of the bubble, but came with a nice mid season break.
Street Clothes
40
36
62
There is some quitting on the season in those numbers, but it shouldn’t make you feel confident they’ll be healthy enough to have a good season. And we know they won’t have good depth so even more of a load will be on them.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:11 am to TigerinATL
I think that the Malik Monk question is the difference between the pick ending in the 5-10 ranges vs the 10-15 range.
Monk is still a young player who significantly improved last season. If he is willing to take less money to return to the Lakers, and if Kendrick Nunn is healthy and plays like he did in Miami, then the Lakers would have a competent backcourt when Westbrook is not on the floor. If Austin Reaves also develops some more, if the Lakers are able to fill out the roster with some quality minimum contracts, and if LeBron and Davis are healthier than they were last season, then it's possible to envision the Lakers as the #8 seed.
That'a a lot of ifs, and I really can't get them much higher than that. In reality, in the West, I likely only see the Thunder, Rockets, Kings, and Spurs as potentially worse teams. I expect every other team in the conference to be better than the Lakers, barring serious injuries.
Monk is still a young player who significantly improved last season. If he is willing to take less money to return to the Lakers, and if Kendrick Nunn is healthy and plays like he did in Miami, then the Lakers would have a competent backcourt when Westbrook is not on the floor. If Austin Reaves also develops some more, if the Lakers are able to fill out the roster with some quality minimum contracts, and if LeBron and Davis are healthier than they were last season, then it's possible to envision the Lakers as the #8 seed.
That'a a lot of ifs, and I really can't get them much higher than that. In reality, in the West, I likely only see the Thunder, Rockets, Kings, and Spurs as potentially worse teams. I expect every other team in the conference to be better than the Lakers, barring serious injuries.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:23 am to TigerinATL
How many games AD plays is really not a big deal.
Yeah he helps them win, but that's only if Lebron is playing.
If Lebron doesn't play, then they are a bottom 5 team in the league b/c AD isn't good enough to get them more than a 30 win season with this supporting cast.
They were 8-18 without Lebron this year. That's winning at a 25 total win rate for an 82 game season.
They were only 25-31 with him.
They were 14-10 with Lebron and NO AD.
AD and Lebron only played 22 games together this past year, and they were .500 in them.
This team is all Lebron. If he isn't playing, they likely aren't winning.
Yeah he helps them win, but that's only if Lebron is playing.
If Lebron doesn't play, then they are a bottom 5 team in the league b/c AD isn't good enough to get them more than a 30 win season with this supporting cast.
They were 8-18 without Lebron this year. That's winning at a 25 total win rate for an 82 game season.
They were only 25-31 with him.
They were 14-10 with Lebron and NO AD.
AD and Lebron only played 22 games together this past year, and they were .500 in them.
This team is all Lebron. If he isn't playing, they likely aren't winning.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:49 am to TeddyPadillac
Even when LeBron is playing, Father Time is already showing his impact on him. Here are LeBron's ratings in Total RAPTOR from the past three seasons:
2019-20: +7.8
2020-21: +6.5
2021-22: +4.7
But yeah, here are the Total RAPTOR ratings for Anthony Davis the last three seasons as well:
2019-20: +7.4
2020-21: +3.7
2021-22: +2.5
And, for funsies, here are Westbrook's numbers:
2019-20: -1.0
2020-21: -2.0
2021-22: -3.2
For reference, the RAPTOR rating for a replacement player (e.g. the guy you sign off the street or out of the G-League) is -2.8. So, last year, the Lakers would theoretically have been better just sitting Westbrook the whole season.
It's extremely rare for older players in decline to reverse or even pause those declines. There is zero reason to believe that the Lakers can be a team that finishes with a .500 record.
2019-20: +7.8
2020-21: +6.5
2021-22: +4.7
But yeah, here are the Total RAPTOR ratings for Anthony Davis the last three seasons as well:
2019-20: +7.4
2020-21: +3.7
2021-22: +2.5
And, for funsies, here are Westbrook's numbers:
2019-20: -1.0
2020-21: -2.0
2021-22: -3.2
For reference, the RAPTOR rating for a replacement player (e.g. the guy you sign off the street or out of the G-League) is -2.8. So, last year, the Lakers would theoretically have been better just sitting Westbrook the whole season.
It's extremely rare for older players in decline to reverse or even pause those declines. There is zero reason to believe that the Lakers can be a team that finishes with a .500 record.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:50 am to GOP_Tiger
At some Lebron has to just age himself out of the game.
He really didn't play Defense at all last year, and you have to wonder if that's going to get worse.
He really didn't play Defense at all last year, and you have to wonder if that's going to get worse.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:51 am to GOP_Tiger
Is RAPTOR a prorated stat or does how many minutes you play affect it? LeBron's PER and WS/48 have stayed in roughly the same range, certainly not the decline RAPTOR is showing.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:01 am to TigerinATL
No, 538 uses RAPTOR to show WAR, which is based on minutes played, but the total RAPTOR score is based simply on box-score and on/off from the actual minutes played.
LeBron's on/off box-score numbers last season were fairly similar to the year before, but his on/off numbers took a big hit last season, which is why his total RAPTOR score went down.
LeBron's on/off box-score numbers last season were fairly similar to the year before, but his on/off numbers took a big hit last season, which is why his total RAPTOR score went down.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:01 am to TigerinATL
quote:
Is RAPTOR a prorated stat or does how many minutes you play affect it
99% sure it’s a cumulative stat like WS. So yes availability would affect it
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:06 am to Baron
No shite, but...
insert drool gif
quote:
Adrian Wojnarowski
@wojespn
· 11m
ESPN Sources: Los Angeles Lakers star Russell Westbrook is planning to exercise his $47.1 million option to return to the franchise for the 2022-2023 season.
insert drool gif
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:08 am to Baron
Westbrook as an expiring is still valuable. Obviously, 50mil is a lot of salary to match. But not impossible
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 10:08 am
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:22 am to GOP_Tiger
If you prefer, you can also look at the impact metric from B-Ball Index (which is actually named LEBRON, for Luck-adjusted player Estimate using a Box prior Regularized ON-off). This is an estimate of a player's impact per 100 possessions, which is also what RAPTOR is.
Both RAPTOR and LEBRON attempt to estimate a player's total impact per 100 possessions, compared to a league-average player.
LINK
The LEBRON database doesn't quite show as dramatic a decline as RAPTOR, but there's still a significant decline in this past season:
2019-20: +5.50
2020-21: +5.31
2021-22: +3.37
Both RAPTOR and LEBRON attempt to estimate a player's total impact per 100 possessions, compared to a league-average player.
LINK
The LEBRON database doesn't quite show as dramatic a decline as RAPTOR, but there's still a significant decline in this past season:
2019-20: +5.50
2020-21: +5.31
2021-22: +3.37
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 10:25 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News