Started By
Message

re: 2022-23 Lakers Thread

Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:05 am to
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12306 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:05 am to
Man this season is going to be so interesting and fun to watch. Our explosion and hopefully their implosion. All the possibilities. Here’s to hoping for good health
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38815 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:10 am to
at minimum the chances that both the pels and the lakers make the playoffs seems remote.

if lakers make/pels miss pels get a lottery pick
if the opposite, pels get a lottery pick
if they both miss, pels get a lottery pick
if they both make, pels get the better of the two non lottery picks

with the 24/25 unprotected pick still to go

Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17855 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:22 am to
Yes, I honestly think that the pick could end up around #8 again. We know that LeBron, Davis, and Westbrook will all be a year older and less athletic. We know that they will not stay healthy. We know that ring-chasers are not going to flock to play with them, so the rest of their roster likely won't be as good as last season's. It remains to be seen if Malik Monk is serious when he says that he'll consider returning to the Lakers for $6 million when he could get considerably more elsewhere -- maybe there's a role for him in Space Jam 3 or something.

But, aside from Kendrick Nunn being healthy, there's no reason to think that anything will be better for the Lakers this season. LeBron is 37 years old, and Father Time is undefeated -- it's time to expect a significant decline in his play.

But the people saying that we should expect a top-5 pick are just wrong. The teams finishing with bottom-5 records are almost always teams that tanked to some degree, and there's no reason for the Lakers to tank. So, unless they hit in the lottery for us, a reasonable expectation is to end up with a pick in the same range as #8 again.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:28 am to
Nah, I believe

BI/Zion/Wembanyama about to run the league via that Lakers pick!
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:41 am to
Ifeel like the pels at worst will be in the same tier Denver and Utah were this year at about 50 wins. That is roughly the 22nd pick.

If Lakers are at around 40 wins that puts them either late lottery or if they somehow make the playoffs mid teens.

That's a 7 to possibly 10 pick jump.
Posted by Pelefraan 1
Member since Jan 2018
6706 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:46 am to
Guys, we don't have to swap with the Lakers if they're worse. It's just an option











This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 7:47 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95744 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:39 am to
Expect top 5? No. But it is a distinct possibility if last year’s lower tier teams decidedly improve, like Houston and Detroit, while fewer teams are tanking.


Only team actively getting worse at the second are the Spurs.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115906 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:47 am to
I have a hard time believing the Lakers will be bad again.

Peak comedy would be the Lakers making the play-in, winning game 1, losing game 2...then winning the lottery.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95744 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:52 am to
Them being better than last year means shipping out Westbrick for talent, either supporting cast along the lines of Hield or another “star” whose value has tanked.

Top 5 is a possibility with them running it back and having limited new talent come in due to lack of cap space and a lack of ring chasers willing to sign on minimums.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61512 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:57 am to
quote:

I have a hard time believing the Lakers will be bad again.


I don’t. Games played the last 3 years

LeBron
56
45
67

IIRC 67 was actually a decent amount of games because of the bubble, but came with a nice mid season break.

Street Clothes
40
36
62

There is some quitting on the season in those numbers, but it shouldn’t make you feel confident they’ll be healthy enough to have a good season. And we know they won’t have good depth so even more of a load will be on them.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17855 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:11 am to
I think that the Malik Monk question is the difference between the pick ending in the 5-10 ranges vs the 10-15 range.

Monk is still a young player who significantly improved last season. If he is willing to take less money to return to the Lakers, and if Kendrick Nunn is healthy and plays like he did in Miami, then the Lakers would have a competent backcourt when Westbrook is not on the floor. If Austin Reaves also develops some more, if the Lakers are able to fill out the roster with some quality minimum contracts, and if LeBron and Davis are healthier than they were last season, then it's possible to envision the Lakers as the #8 seed.

That'a a lot of ifs, and I really can't get them much higher than that. In reality, in the West, I likely only see the Thunder, Rockets, Kings, and Spurs as potentially worse teams. I expect every other team in the conference to be better than the Lakers, barring serious injuries.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25590 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:23 am to
How many games AD plays is really not a big deal.
Yeah he helps them win, but that's only if Lebron is playing.
If Lebron doesn't play, then they are a bottom 5 team in the league b/c AD isn't good enough to get them more than a 30 win season with this supporting cast.

They were 8-18 without Lebron this year. That's winning at a 25 total win rate for an 82 game season.
They were only 25-31 with him.
They were 14-10 with Lebron and NO AD.

AD and Lebron only played 22 games together this past year, and they were .500 in them.


This team is all Lebron. If he isn't playing, they likely aren't winning.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17855 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:49 am to
Even when LeBron is playing, Father Time is already showing his impact on him. Here are LeBron's ratings in Total RAPTOR from the past three seasons:

2019-20: +7.8
2020-21: +6.5
2021-22: +4.7

But yeah, here are the Total RAPTOR ratings for Anthony Davis the last three seasons as well:

2019-20: +7.4
2020-21: +3.7
2021-22: +2.5

And, for funsies, here are Westbrook's numbers:

2019-20: -1.0
2020-21: -2.0
2021-22: -3.2

For reference, the RAPTOR rating for a replacement player (e.g. the guy you sign off the street or out of the G-League) is -2.8. So, last year, the Lakers would theoretically have been better just sitting Westbrook the whole season.

It's extremely rare for older players in decline to reverse or even pause those declines. There is zero reason to believe that the Lakers can be a team that finishes with a .500 record.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115906 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:50 am to
At some Lebron has to just age himself out of the game.

He really didn't play Defense at all last year, and you have to wonder if that's going to get worse.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61512 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:51 am to
Is RAPTOR a prorated stat or does how many minutes you play affect it? LeBron's PER and WS/48 have stayed in roughly the same range, certainly not the decline RAPTOR is showing.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17855 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:01 am to
No, 538 uses RAPTOR to show WAR, which is based on minutes played, but the total RAPTOR score is based simply on box-score and on/off from the actual minutes played.

LeBron's on/off box-score numbers last season were fairly similar to the year before, but his on/off numbers took a big hit last season, which is why his total RAPTOR score went down.
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1646 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Is RAPTOR a prorated stat or does how many minutes you play affect it


99% sure it’s a cumulative stat like WS. So yes availability would affect it
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115906 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:06 am to
No shite, but...


quote:

Adrian Wojnarowski
@wojespn
· 11m
ESPN Sources: Los Angeles Lakers star Russell Westbrook is planning to exercise his $47.1 million option to return to the franchise for the 2022-2023 season.


insert drool gif
Posted by Pelefraan 1
Member since Jan 2018
6706 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:08 am to
Westbrook as an expiring is still valuable. Obviously, 50mil is a lot of salary to match. But not impossible
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 10:08 am
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17855 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:22 am to
If you prefer, you can also look at the impact metric from B-Ball Index (which is actually named LEBRON, for Luck-adjusted player Estimate using a Box prior Regularized ON-off). This is an estimate of a player's impact per 100 possessions, which is also what RAPTOR is.

Both RAPTOR and LEBRON attempt to estimate a player's total impact per 100 possessions, compared to a league-average player.

LINK

The LEBRON database doesn't quite show as dramatic a decline as RAPTOR, but there's still a significant decline in this past season:

2019-20: +5.50
2020-21: +5.31
2021-22: +3.37
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 10:25 am
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 211
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 211Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram