Started By
Message

re: Turns out that Caviezel bailed on “The Resurrection” sequel due to a reportedly low salary

Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:55 am to
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25829 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:55 am to
I think the can role with a similar looking actor can be done.

Scripture paints a picture where Jesus was both same and different. He had his wounds, but at times was not recognized by his disciples. Not immediately knowing it was Jesus was key to many verses.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5690 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 10:24 am to
quote:

I like Jim Caviezel. He's a good actor and seems to be a good Christian role model in Hollywood. That being said, he's much too old to play Jesus Christ in a sequel to a film that was produced over 20 years ago. He'd be close to 60 in 2027 when he's doing press for this movie when the real guy was 33 at the time of these events.

I agree.

Joaquin Phoenix playing Napoleon didn’t work for me for the same reason. Just too old for the part. I’m glad someone else is playing Jesus even though I usually don’t like casting changes either. I do in this case, though.
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
13244 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:31 am to
Why they can't find an actual Jew or Jew looking person to play Jesus is ridiculous.

Look at The Chosen. That's a very Jew looking goyim.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 11:32 am
Posted by jbraua
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Oct 2007
7794 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

I'd blame Gibson for the low ball.


For a man who dislikes the Jews, he sure knows how to act like one.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25694 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:27 am to
I honestly think its best to not a have a recurring actor play Christ. It gets a little....problematic if people start picturing you when thinking of God. Same thing has been discussed a lot in theological circles about Roumie.

Having a new guy every movie separates the portrayer from the role and doesnt allow the audience to unintentionally get attached to a false image.

It also doesnt allow people to think "ugh, the role of Jesus Christ BELONGS to Jim Caviezel!"

Its not just a movie role and shouldnt be viewed like any other role.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4619 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:41 am to
quote:

For a man who dislikes the Jews, he sure knows how to act like one.


He worships one too
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6294 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Worse than that was he was black balled for that movie.


No he wasn’t. He headlined a major TV series a few years later, person of interest. He was also the lead on The Prisoner.

Frequency is on of my favorite movies. I like the guy as an actor, but would agree his is kinda one-note which limits his roles.
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26542 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Frequency is on of my favorite movies.


The Count of Monte Cristo
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 9:11 pm
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
4431 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:39 pm to
Maybe they offered that sum because they wanted to go a different direction?
Posted by LSUPERMAN
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
3030 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

lsusa


You proved my point without trying.

quote:

He headlined a major TV series a few years later, person of interest


7 years after Passion and we are talking about a TV series that only ran for 5 seasons and could have been cancelled at anytime.

quote:

He was also the lead on The Prisoner.



A 6 episode run 5 years after?

quote:

Frequency is on of my favorite movies


Filmed 4 years before Passion.

Goes from acting in big movies to a TV series 7 years after is the definition of being black balled.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65876 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:44 am to
I honestly don't believe these movies will be done right.
Posted by Usm Tiger
Hattiesburg
Member since Oct 2017
283 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:37 pm to
Jim is devout. Id imagine he would even do it for close to nothing if he thought it was part of his calling.
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
11081 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I honestly don't believe these movies will be done right.


At least we have the full story. No concern about a rushed ending with Jesus going crazy and burning down Jerusalem.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
80394 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Goes from acting in big movies to a TV series 7 years after is the definition of being black balled.

He was in Deja Vu with Denzel like a year after the Passion.
quote:

we are talking about a TV series that only ran for 5 seasons and could have been cancelled at anytime.

Was it supposed to run for 20 just because Jim Caviezel was in it? Maybe it sucked but still had a good run.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 6:42 pm
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4619 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I honestly don't believe these movies will be done right.


I’d be lying if I said I didn’t have doubts about it being able to surpass the success of the first film.

The first film was a masterpiece in regards to its’ cinematography, set designs, and musical score. You don’t even have to be religious to appreciate it as a stylized, artistic portrayal of an iconic story.

I’m convinced that Gibson never intended for the first film to have a sequel. He probably initially thought that it was going to be a simple movie that might break even at the box office but not do well enough to warrant a sequel.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram