Started By
Message

The problem with nearly every TV Series ever made

Posted on 10/24/21 at 8:27 pm
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 8:27 pm
I love me some great TV but for all shows that are series in nature(as opposed to episode based), it seems that with very rare exception, they all end up falling victim to Gilligan's Island syndrome.

Namely, they're successful, so they keep wanting new seasons. The problem is, the reason you liked the show in the first place was likely because of some key problem/conflict that you found interesting and enjoyed the journey to potential resolution.

This puts shows in the position of either 1, resolving that key element within 1 or 2 seasons then having to come up with some segway that still works or 2, constantly getting close, then snatching defeat from the jaws of victory

Basically, "oh look, we almost got off the island again.......better luck next season!"

I think that show creators would all do better if they started shows with a defined number of seasons in mind and followed a rational trajectory to land at the end.

Yeah. I know. This goes against, "but we're popular so let's make some more money".

But there's no getting around it. This is why so many shows just end up going off the rails and train wrecking at the end.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28822 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 8:32 pm to
Every series should be a limited series.
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Every series should be a limited series.


Yep

They would ALL be sooooooo much better!
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98195 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 11:31 pm to
Most TV series in the UK are like this. Two or three seasons at most.
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
22927 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 11:39 pm to
American TV shows go on extremely too long and have too many episodes per season.

Also, they put too much effort on shocking season finales which often paint the shows writers in a corner on now to navigate the next season.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 6:27 am to
you glazed right over the only purpose for every series ever made.

however, did Seinfeld have this problem? taxi? cheers after Diane left?
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27251 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 6:55 am to
quote:

Every series should be a limited series.



Then we would have threads of "which TV series deserved more seasons?"
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
3354 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 7:41 am to
quote:

I think that show creators would all do better if they started shows with a defined number of seasons in mind and followed a rational trajectory to land at the end.



Supernatural was planned for 5 seasons. But a channel like CW was desperate for a big flagship program so they kept making up problems for the heroes and riding the money.

If you view the show in the scope of the first 5 seasons it is excellent.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 7:42 am
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
3824 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 8:09 am to
This was one thing I really liked about Mad Men. There was four phases of Sterling Cooper ownership, extremely good character development, and a very close attention-to-detail regarding the vast cultural changes from 1960 to 1970. There was also a continuously rotating cast apart from the Sterling Cooper management. It made the show significantly different every year to the point it was like a new show every few years.

Contrast that with Cheers, which was a favorite, but there was two abrupt and big cast changes and it was very stale by season 8-9.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24574 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 10:58 am to
Justified is the perfect example of how to successfully solve this problem. It began and ended perfectly, and they did not try to force it to continue past its natural due date.


I think series need to be 8-12 episodes per season, and they need to have a beginning and ending mapped out before ever filming. They have to stick to the plan regardless of the show's popularity. I would rather roll 4 seasons and be considered one of the greatest ever than roll 9 and become a disgrace. Then again I am not having money thrown at me from all directions, so I certainly could be corrupted by that...
Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
23153 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I think that show creators would all do better if they started shows with a defined number of seasons in mind and followed a rational trajectory to land at the end.

With the timing of the show and the novelty of internet discussions (and podcasts), Lost could have been one of the greatest shows in history if they had done this.

So many mid-run filler episodes with backstories and new introductions, when the core premise was right there waiting to be fleshed out in a much more satisfying way.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85054 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 11:04 am to
It helps when they don't become truly popular until after the fact. The Wire comes to mind. 5 seasons was perfect.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35542 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 11:36 am to
The Gilligan's Island isn't really apt because their failure to get off the Island was the joke, the show was the shenanigans on the Island.

But I get your point. Of shows painting themselves into a corner like Lost where they treat resolution of the problem too seriously and that becomes the whole focus.

Which is why people loved Mad Men. There was no endgame or wishing for a solution to a problem. It was just a day in the life. There was no winner or loser like Breaking Bad's ethos.

Breaking Bad was dead set on Walter always being so close to 'getting off the Island' only to be foiled by family, friends and the bad guys time and time again and starting over to have more seasons.

Even shows like The Killing designed to have one Season fell into this trap. A show with one premise does this as they want to make more money and then it just becomes soap opera.

I guess the only solution is to have a show about nothing.
Posted by Hoodie
Donaldsonville, LA
Member since Dec 2019
2998 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 11:42 am to
The Shield was unique and so enjoyable in that the conclusion of the very first episode saw the protagonist commit a terrible act. From then on, the show was about how what he did affected him and his teammates; about them trying to dig their way out of a hole. The series was like a rollercoaster ride that climbed, hit the top with a certain incident, then whoosed you toward the bottom at a breakneck pace until the series finale. The pacing of The Shield was masterful.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 11:43 am
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21323 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:39 pm to
That’s actually getting better. When I was younger no series had a fully developed plot at the outset. Now we have tons of them.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
66007 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:43 pm to
Banshee did it right
Posted by MDB
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2019
3081 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 9:38 pm to
And that is why creativity and solid writing are so important. Formulaic thinking is a series killer.

Great writing almost always trumps acting.

Early writers successfully relied on episodic thinking and worked on character development and identification. An ongoing narrative was secondary.

Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29453 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

you glazed right over the only purpose for every series ever made.

however, did Seinfeld have this problem? taxi? cheers after Diane left?

Comedy is the one genre exempt from needing an overarching story arc.
Posted by Nodust
Member since Aug 2010
22632 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Every series should be a limited series.

Mini series may be the perfect format. Movies don’t have enough run time to tell a complete story. 6 seasons is normally too long.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20417 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 2:15 am to
Depends on what you're going for, really.

Comedies, and shows you might call comedies but are really more just reflections and observations on daily life with a sense of humor, can go on a long time before getting stale. It just depends on the premise the show is built on.

Speaking of premise- you take Magnum PI (original), and that could go on as long as the actors and writers wanted to. Doesn't matter that it was mostly episodic in nature, because it was the ideal male fantasy (Thomas Magnum, the dashing ex SEAL, lives rent-free in a Hawaiian estate, driving a Ferrari, entertaining countless young hotties, hanging with his buds, jousting verbally with Higgins etc). Yeah, at some point he had to grow up.

For something with a more specific overall story, you do probably need to plot out the course of the show, and hit markers every so often to keep it moving, and when you hit the end, shut it down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram