Started By
Message

re: Sinners is on max

Posted on 7/10/25 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

I thought it would have been cool for the Native Americans to make another appearance.


Yeah, apparently Chekov's Gun doesn't extend to Chekov's Choctaws. I'm sure there is some grandiose explanation of how the Indians had disappeared, but the Choctaw had been removed by the 20th century, so it's hard to explain away in the timeline of the movie. This gets to one of my main complaints about the movie. It is so reliant on metaphors that it sometimes loses its own plot on in service to clunky metaphors.
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 1:40 pm
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
67800 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

I thought it would have been cool for the Native Americans to make another appearance.


I would've bet my life that they ended up being the equalizer to help overcome the unbelievable disadvantage in numbers
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14683 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:


Watched last night. Definitely not as good as the hype and RT score indicated, but I enjoyed it well enough.


I think a lot of the hype and superlatives are due to the intermingling of the music and the story. You could almost say it's a movie about blues music with some vampires sprinkled in.

How much you like the movie is probably highly dependent on how you feel about the soundtrack/score.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 10:40 pm to
This was a surprisingly ok movie. The soundtrack really added to it.
Posted by nosaj
Member since Sep 2010
2636 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 10:46 pm to
Movie was pretty good. Nothing earth shattering. Really no desire to watch it again, but it was entertaining.

Why did they keep running back outside? That part was dumb, seems like Hailee could have fricked some shite up right after she got Stack, and then they did it again at the end. Did they explain that?
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Movie was pretty good. Nothing earth shattering. Really no desire to watch it again, but it was entertaining.

Why did they keep running back outside? That part was dumb, seems like Hailee could have fricked some shite up right after she got Stack, and then they did it again at the end. Did they explain that?


I didn't understand that either. I just went with it.
Posted by nosaj
Member since Sep 2010
2636 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 10:52 pm to
Also I feel like a little more backstory on Remmick and why he was in the area at all would have helped. He just kind of showed up being chased by the natives.

I know he was “drawn” to Sammy, but that was later.

I almost wish he tied back to their Chicago days somehow.
Posted by habz007
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2007
4847 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 12:20 am to
quote:

Worth a watch?


One watch, ok maybe. But it was absolute average at best. The first hour was a complete waste of time you’ll never get back. Once the vampire stuff started to develop, it got pretty good. And then it flopped at the end.

It has ZERO rewatchability


I went in really wanting to like it and couldn’t wait to stream after reading about it on this board. Now I know never to trust this board again.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66726 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 12:44 am to
It’s a beautifully made, well acted, B horror movie.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467070 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 8:58 am to
I watched it last night.

The production was great other than shitty CGI (and a lot of it wasn't necessary like the damage for vampires after being shot. No reason not to use tactile prosthetics there).

It was....Ok. I do agree with a comment made a week or 2 on here discussing Jordan Peele where someone said Ryan Coogler is who Jordan Peele thinks he is (paraphrasing).

I'm not a fan of overtly allegorical horror and horror that is intentionally not scary. This movie was both of those things in copious amounts. I was also not a fan of the jumps from linear storylines (the non-white culture over time montage and the Irish jig by Paddy Mayne).

The biggest issue to me is that the metaphors/allegories seem to be jumbled and don't really work. They did not spend enough time on the vampires to establish their symbolism as exploitation of black culture, for example. However, further, I don't think the comments by Merrick about helping them fight the Klan were insincere, which muddles that angle a bit. Then add in the Irish jig scene and it really gets muddled, as this showed the melding of the black vampires into Irish culture which was the reverse of the exploitation and appropriation the vampires were supposed to be. Also the only time the vampires played appropriated black music was to the mixed-white character (which I guess can play as the bridge to appropriation)

And then in the mid-credit scene, Remmick was gone and the vampires still exist? As only a black man and a mixed woman. Why?

The "sinner" aspect plays better with the music being the sin/devil (as stated by the preacher-father), but this REALLY hurts the exploitation-appropriation allegory, which clearly wasn't the goal.

As someone said on this page

quote:

This gets to one of my main complaints about the movie. It is so reliant on metaphors that it sometimes loses its own plot on in service to clunky metaphors.




quote:

I think a lot of the hype and superlatives are due to the intermingling of the music and the story. You could almost say it's a movie about blues music with some vampires sprinkled in.

How much you like the movie is probably highly dependent on how you feel about the soundtrack/score.



The problem is that in terms of the allegory, the music is what muddles it the most.

This is a horror movie for the Jenna Ortega character in 2022 Scream.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 8:59 am
Posted by TigerNutwhack
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4243 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 9:06 am to
I finally watched it last night. It was....fine. I actually really liked the way it tried to use music, it at least added some surrealness to the night. I think it might have been better if they never showed the vampires being vampires until Haliee eats Stack. I also thought the fight with the KKK at the end seemed out of place maybe? The pacing of it felt off.

Decent movie to watch while the wife is away, but don't think I'll watch it again.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
57012 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 9:58 am to
Also, nice play on the Robert Johnson legend.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43192 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I also thought the fight with the KKK at the end seemed out of place maybe? The pacing of it felt off.


That and the flash forward with the dance scene.

Edit: I see some dv's. So you folks liked the the scene with future of music being intertwined? I liked the connection to the past, but it was strange to try to connect it to the future.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 7:46 pm
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
7036 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Started out great finished stupid.

Only if you don’t love grindhouse dusk til dawn type stuff.

It’s tonally all over the place beginning vs end but it’s a genre mashup & thematically consistent.

If this doesn’t wind up being my favorite movie of the year, it will have been a great year for movies.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
7036 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I also thought the fight with the KKK at the end seemed out of place maybe? The pacing of it felt off.

Hogwood was always the real villain of the story. Even though he’s a vampire, Smoke believes Remmick’s warning at the end for a reason.

Coogler not so subtly opining that xenophobia is worse than being a vampire.

The part I thought was weird was the very very end with Buddy & the way the 90s vampires act vs the meat of the movie, but I’ll look past this because the whole thing was fun as hell.

Especially if you love music & especially if you have a soft spot for delta blues, bluegrass, roots music in general.

The movie wants to say some things, and there are some arthouse / cinemaphile sequences to feast on — but it’s also not taking itself too seriously.

Seems like grindhouse is a significant influence here, a lot of people critiquing it like it was meant to be citizen kane are overlooking that.

My guess is if you enjoy Tarantino movies you will probably get a kick out of this.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 6:04 pm
Posted by witty alias
Member since Nov 2012
2029 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Interesting movie. Until the last 10 minutes where all the white people just randomly decided to kill black people.

If Hollywood made an honest movie now who’s killing who?


You sound like a huge pussy.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
7036 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

You sound like a huge pussy.

Yeah, you have to not be very smart to not recognize Mary and even Remmick are meant to be sympathetic characters.

Remmick was an oppressed Irish immigrant. Mary is partially a commentary on the challenges & even dangers of being “white-presenting”, which still persist. And an interracial relationship is one of the core romances.

Coogler makes a concerted effort to not be hypocritical in any underlying criticisms of racism.

God forbid the KKK get wrecked at the end of a reconstruction era period piece lol.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 6:04 pm
Posted by TigerNutwhack
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4243 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 3:19 pm to
And just to be clear, I have 0 problem with the KKK story, I just thought that it was a strange action scene after the actual climax of the film. It may have played better to me if it was more a background scene to Preacher boy showing up at the church. Like he's slo-mo slaughtering them to the gospel choir or the preacher preaching.

It just kinda felt like a scene that should have been at a different part of the movie. But I'm no film critic, just threw me off after the vampire scenes.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467070 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:48 pm to
You're right

I did not think about this in real time but it was definitely a Tarantino moment, which has always hurt his end product (like Inglorious Basterds and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood)

It's just random 70s exploitation pulp for the sake of having 70s exploitation pulp

Not my preference
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
7036 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

And just to be clear, I have 0 problem with the KKK story, I just thought that it was a strange action scene after the actual climax of the film. It may have played better to me if it was more a background scene to Preacher boy showing up at the church. Like he's slo-mo slaughtering them to the gospel choir or the preacher preaching

See this makes sense to me and is very different from the post I was responding to more combatively in that other reply.

That response was in reference to WillieFistergash whose criticism ignores that it was a clearly established thread going back to when Remmick is first introduced. That guy’s critique truly can just be read as “reconstruction era settings hurt my feelings”

Yours is actual criticism. While I personally enjoy this kind of chaotic plot structure (very Tarantino), I think it’s a valid opinion.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 6:05 pm
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram