Started By
Message

re: Project Hail Mary Discussion thread, Box Office. Spoilers Allowed. Crosses 400 mil

Posted on 3/22/26 at 8:13 pm to
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13624 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 8:13 pm to
Wife and I saw it with our two collage aged kids this weekend. All four of us really liked it. Two had read the book and two had not.

Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7496 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Ryan Gosling got hold of Andy Weir’s manuscript before the novel was even published and called Lord and Miller directly. 


Animal. Gosling clearly loved this story, and Miller and Lord were phenomenal on their choices. Love seeing this kind of very difficult vision brought to life.

And because it was puppetry and practical effects, none of it looked cheap, CGI, or chintzy. I can only hope that real effects start to make a comeback. CGI just can't hold a candle.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60096 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 10:37 pm to
141 WW

quote:

Amazon MGM Studios‘ Project Hail Mary had a blessed Saturday chalking up $27.1M, just -18% off Friday/preview’s $33.1M which rockets this Ryan Gosling starring, Lord & Miller directed production to a magnificent $80.6M. Worldwide opening is a fantastic near $141M which is the best for an MPA title so far this year.

While that’s the second-best domestic start for a non-franchise movie after Oppenheimer ($82.4M), it’s the best opening for a non-franchise movie in March (ahead of Jordan Peele’s Us ($71M). Interesting enough, the trajectory for Project Hail Mary is very similar to Oppenheimer which posted Friday/previews of $33M but dipped -21% on Saturday with $26.2M. Oppenheimer‘s Sunday was $23.1M. If Project Hail Mary is north of that, it will be the best start for a non-franchise movie at the domestic B.O. Currently, the Amy Pascal, Rachel O’Connor, Andy Weir, Aditya Sood produced movie is eyeing $20.3M today.


quote:

Audiences for “Project Hail Mary” were 57% male and 60% white. Many of them chose to watch the movie on premium large formats, with Imax, Dolby and other larger-than-life screens representing roughly 55% of ticket sales.


LINK
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32397 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

It made 3/4 of it's net production budget on it's opening weekend You love to see it


Normally I don’t really care about movies making money and getting all caught up in that (if I like I movie, I like it) but this is a scenario where you want Hollywood to get the message that optimistic Human stories will get butts in seats.

Hell, Matt Walsh (a curmudgeon) wrote a glowing review of it. If you get that a-hole encouraging your movie, you know you have struck a chord.
This post was edited on 3/22/26 at 10:44 pm
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
8114 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:31 am to
quote:

These budgets are just insane. There's gotta be some money laundering going on, right?

HELL YES!!!!
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84726 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:28 am to
Saw it last night with wife and daughter. I thought it was great and read the book. My wife liked it and she hadn’t read the book. My 11 year old daughter thought it was too long and fell asleep
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35399 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Every reaction Gosling gives to the alien is to something physically in front of him.


I think this means as much to us as it does the actor. Every director or producer who thinks about just green screening everything needs to compare this to the video we all saw of Ian McKellen have a near breakdown to how he had to work on the Hobbit.

Practical trumps digital. There's a reason why the LOTR movies are a classic that people will rewatch over and over again and the Hobbit movies no one watches.

quote:

And the lead isn't a superhero, a cop, or a soldier. He's just an ordinary middle school science teacher.


I think this made his heroic decisions at the end of the movie that much more impactful - and I feel like it's something Hollywood needs to remember for ALL of their protagonists going forward - audiences will genuinely like a lead who feels like a real person.

quote:

Lord and Miller hadn’t directed a live-action film in 12 years. Their last attempt at a space movie, Solo: A Star Wars Story, ended with them getting replaced mid-production by Ron Howard over creative differences. Everything since then has been animation and producing. This was their shot at proving they could handle a $248 million live-action production on their own terms, and 95% of critics say they did.


I'd say they've proven themselves 100%.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116180 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 9:02 am to
Saw it last night in IMAX and really dug it. Haven’t read the book, felt the science stuff was just the right mix of not too complex to bore you but not completely nonsense to keep the plot moving


My only real gripe for lack of a better word are there are a couple of emotional notes that they could’ve just let breathe better. There would be like 2-3 gosling quips in a scene where the emotion is really swelling and I think they were scared to bask in that long enough for it to give it the full weight it should’ve had
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60096 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:38 pm to
300 mil, domestic, would be incredible. Made 9.5 mil yesterday

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24837 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 12:23 pm to
Went into this movie having little clue to what it was about but ending up loving it
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60096 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
6201 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 12:27 pm to
Going tonight. Pumped. Don't read books anymore but listened to the audiobook bc of this board and was hooked.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60096 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 12:32 pm to
I'm watching it tonight as well. Very excited
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42409 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 12:42 pm to
More than Dune 2 is kind of wild.
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
7400 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

My only real gripe for lack of a better word are there are a couple of emotional notes that they could’ve just let breathe better. There would be like 2-3 gosling quips in a scene where the emotion is really swelling and I think they were scared to bask in that long enough for it to give it the full weight it should’ve had.

For someone who didn't read the book, IMO you nailed the biggest problem with the movie. I say that because if you don't know the story, you are overwhelmed keeping up with the details of the plot and could easily miss emotional beats that book readers expect.

For those lamenting specific details left out of the movie, I like hearing what they missed, because everyone has different ideas of what would have been better to keep in the story. But the movie is obviously a different beast, and they had to focus on the part of the story that they knew the biggest audience would resonate with.

The problem I had with the movie is that they indeed included the biggest revelations of the reluctant hero's journey to redemption, but glossed over them for some reason. At the start of the story, Grace has profound memory loss. In the book he doesn't even know his name, and doesn't even know that he's in space for a while. In the movie he has lost a lot of memory but knew his name immediately and (understandably) discovers that he is in space and starts working on why he's in space sooner. A very subtle difference but it affects how we perceive the biggest revelation of all near the end of the story. In the book, when he finally remembers why he had profound memory loss, that he had to be dragged (drugged) onto the ship kicking and screaming like the little bitch coward that he was, it was quite jarring for the reader to realize that our hero was such a coward that he couldn't sacrifice himself to help the survival of mankind. In the movie, I'm glad they revealed this and didn't gloss over the facts of the case, but his reaction to finally remembering this is like two seconds of him curled in a ball looking distressed, and then they just moved on from there. I think that was a big miss. One thing I noticed about the storytelling is that there were a bunch of places where they could have had better exposition of the story by having Grace narrate some of his inner thoughts (during existing scenes, no increase in runtime), but it was just silence.

I can't remember if a detail from the book on his redemption journey was left out of the movie. When he decided to forego the trip back home in order to save Rocky and Erid, I think it was obvious that he probably would never get back home, but in the book it was clear that if he went to help Rocky, he expected to starve to death in 3-4 years because Eridian food was too toxic for humans. This made his decision even more heroic, but I can't remember if they played down in the movie how quickly he expected to die.
Posted by GoldenSombrero
Member since Sep 2010
2900 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 2:29 pm to
Pretty much nailed exactly what I wish they would have included.

Honestly an extended version of the movie on streaming would be a fantastic approach to offset keeping the theatrical release shorter.

Gosling talking thru his ideas, like you have to in the book to tell the story, would have added a ton without increasing run time.

But considering all the book readers aren’t discussing/ complaining about anything visual I.e. Rocky, etc says a lot about how well they executed on most everything
Posted by GoldenSombrero
Member since Sep 2010
2900 posts
Posted on 3/26/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

I can't remember if a detail from the book on his redemption journey was left out of the movie. When he decided to forego the trip back home in order to save Rocky and Erid, I think it was obvious that he probably would never get back home, but in the book it was clear that if he went to help Rocky, he expected to starve to death in 3-4 years because Eridian food was too toxic for humans. This made his decision even more heroic, but I can't remember if they played down in the movie how quickly he expected to die.


They didn’t touch on this or the Me Burger in the movie.

For non book readers, they take a sample of his tissue/DNA and create a food source
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60096 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 9:42 am to
Amazing hold. International is apparently holding really well too.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Exceptional 2nd wknd hold for #ProjectHailMary   !

Powerful $14.6M on 2nd FRI and heading to likely $53M area for 2nd wknd for drop of only 34%!

Fantastic WOM helping to drive it with repeat biz also kicking in. 10-day domestic #boxoffice cume shd climb to $163M.

Entry into $300M club a lock now, will now challenge Oppenheimer's $330M!
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14814 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 9:58 am to
Amaze. I knew WOM would help this one.

quote:

with repeat biz also kicking in


Guilty.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60096 posts
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:07 am to
I rarely see a movie twice in theaters, but I'm gonna watch this one again this week
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram