- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obtuse Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice TD review thread (SPOILERS p5+)
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:28 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:28 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Eh, we're mincing words at this point, no need to go deeper. You can't have fans without something to be a fan of, that's the way I see it. Fans don't create the property, or the easter eggs... And I get what you're saying, but what's more likely to happen 1) People stop looking for Easter Eggs just because they feel like stopping or 2) Marvel/DC stop using Easter Eggs to entice fans? The writer may want 1, but that's impossible as fans are really powerless in this, they're going to look for the things that are supposedly there as long as they are there to look for. It's the chicken or the egg.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:33 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I will call a slight bs because at the time Iron Man was not a safe bet. Iron Man was a B level hero with an actor on the downturn. Marvel was taking multiple risk with their early movies and they paid off because they were great movies.
But let's also not forget that Marvel did not force feed us future plot points like comic book movies do now. Marvel used mid and end credit scenes to set up future movies and reused elements from previous movies instead of shoehorning elements into movies to be used for future movies.
Marvel set their universe up and now that they already have a foundation they are using current movies to set up pieces for later. Granted I will say those parts of the movies have been frowned upon. No one liked Thor's visions in AoU. No one liked Falcon in Ant-Man.
But let's also not forget that Marvel did not force feed us future plot points like comic book movies do now. Marvel used mid and end credit scenes to set up future movies and reused elements from previous movies instead of shoehorning elements into movies to be used for future movies.
Marvel set their universe up and now that they already have a foundation they are using current movies to set up pieces for later. Granted I will say those parts of the movies have been frowned upon. No one liked Thor's visions in AoU. No one liked Falcon in Ant-Man.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:34 pm to illuminatic
quote:I know of The Flashpoint Paradox. I have both the movie and comic.
The Flashpoint Paradox. It was a stupid scene with no context if you aren't familiar with the story. I'd guess less than 10% of the audience in my theater knew what they were seeing.
That was not what popped into my mind. And with all the ghost wave lights flashing, I couldn't even see his suit well enough to tell.
I honestly started thinking of maybe Booster Gold or something. It did not look like Flash at all.
This post was edited on 3/29/16 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:37 pm to Scruffy
It looks like it was based on this suit from Injustice:


Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:38 pm to abellsujr
I thought he looked more like speed racer
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:39 pm to Scruffy
There is also crisis on infinite earths, where one of the iconic moments is Flash appearing from the future to warn Batman.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:51 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Synder would have wanted Flash to melt like in that scene so he could cover the scene I cgi. Killing a character we have no clue or concerns about and pretending it is powerful and meaningful is right up his alley
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:58 pm to Scruffy
I had no idea until I got home and read about it. Nobody in the theater had a clue what that was about 
Posted on 3/29/16 at 12:59 pm to NawlinsTiger9
it didn't even occur to me that it could have possibly been anyone. Luckily, Snyder doesn't dwell on anything for more than 30 seconds, so it was onto the next random plot point and forgotten
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:01 pm to Freauxzen
Well, after seeing this, I definitely think the critics are overreacting.
I didn't have any problems following things, it was less convoluted than Avengers: Age of Ultron.
Parts I GREATLY liked:
1) Affleck's Wayne/Batman, and Irons' Alfred. It's a different combo than we've seen on film before, with a younger Alfred and an older Wayne (relative to their previous roles). I absolutely loved the portrayals, they've definitely captured the Batman I've imagined. BTW while he's brutally violent, he doesn't kill as much as people claim. Dream sequences= not relevant, plus he's a resistance fighter for the planet at this point. Hand-to-hand combat- he stabs the guy through the shoulder, he sprays the gunfire over people's heads to make them duck and disperse. Car stuff- well, maybe the criminal's cars have great airbags
; no getting around the batplane stuff. But he's "doing the only thing that matters in his life", trying to save the world. If he's gonna kill Superman to do this, he will kill Russian mafia henchmen with guns in the way. He kills the guy with the flamethrower because there's absolutely no other way, and this time he won't let "Martha" die.
The Batman scenes alone were worth the price of admission.
2) Wonder Woman- there were lots of fear that Gadot would not be able to carry this off. Wrong; again, she is a highlight. The cat-and-mouse between Wayne and Ms Prince was pretty good, I enjoyed the chemistry between the actors. And then when she steps into full WW mode, they really do the character justice. Wonder Woman as a hero can hold her own with Superman, and this definitely comes across.
I'm now looking forward to the WW movie.
Basically, this is one of, maybe THE best Batman movie yet (and note that Batman's name is first), and it has a great introduction to Diana Prince/Wonder Woman. It almost feels like they shoehorned Superman in.
Superman is a tough issue, and one Marvel doesn't have to face. Thor's almost as powerful, but he's off on Asgard a lot of the time, plus he's also a lot more hands-off. He addresses threats to "the realm", while Superman is trying to help out as much as he possibly can (i.e. the people in the South American fire). As shown in the film, Batman's actions would be noticed by Superman, so you need to address this somehow. That's what this film did- it showed how a person (Luthor) could manipulate the situation to negate Superman's physical prowess; and it gave a threat (Doomsday) that he alone could not defeat.
It gave us the premise going forward that we have room for other heroes in this world. It also showed how these characters could balance out the others; they are all alone initially, other than Wayne having Alfred. Batman's comment "I'm a friend of your son's", and the response "yeah, I can kinda tell, the cape and all"... it made sense to me. They all have different power/skills, but they each are isolated in society; and they are now meeting others that they can understand and that can understand them. Building a DC world, this might have been the toughest part to make, and the following movies should flow better.
I didn't have any problems following things, it was less convoluted than Avengers: Age of Ultron.
Parts I GREATLY liked:
1) Affleck's Wayne/Batman, and Irons' Alfred. It's a different combo than we've seen on film before, with a younger Alfred and an older Wayne (relative to their previous roles). I absolutely loved the portrayals, they've definitely captured the Batman I've imagined. BTW while he's brutally violent, he doesn't kill as much as people claim. Dream sequences= not relevant, plus he's a resistance fighter for the planet at this point. Hand-to-hand combat- he stabs the guy through the shoulder, he sprays the gunfire over people's heads to make them duck and disperse. Car stuff- well, maybe the criminal's cars have great airbags
The Batman scenes alone were worth the price of admission.
2) Wonder Woman- there were lots of fear that Gadot would not be able to carry this off. Wrong; again, she is a highlight. The cat-and-mouse between Wayne and Ms Prince was pretty good, I enjoyed the chemistry between the actors. And then when she steps into full WW mode, they really do the character justice. Wonder Woman as a hero can hold her own with Superman, and this definitely comes across.
I'm now looking forward to the WW movie.
Basically, this is one of, maybe THE best Batman movie yet (and note that Batman's name is first), and it has a great introduction to Diana Prince/Wonder Woman. It almost feels like they shoehorned Superman in.
Superman is a tough issue, and one Marvel doesn't have to face. Thor's almost as powerful, but he's off on Asgard a lot of the time, plus he's also a lot more hands-off. He addresses threats to "the realm", while Superman is trying to help out as much as he possibly can (i.e. the people in the South American fire). As shown in the film, Batman's actions would be noticed by Superman, so you need to address this somehow. That's what this film did- it showed how a person (Luthor) could manipulate the situation to negate Superman's physical prowess; and it gave a threat (Doomsday) that he alone could not defeat.
It gave us the premise going forward that we have room for other heroes in this world. It also showed how these characters could balance out the others; they are all alone initially, other than Wayne having Alfred. Batman's comment "I'm a friend of your son's", and the response "yeah, I can kinda tell, the cape and all"... it made sense to me. They all have different power/skills, but they each are isolated in society; and they are now meeting others that they can understand and that can understand them. Building a DC world, this might have been the toughest part to make, and the following movies should flow better.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:10 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:20 pm to DieSmilen
No, he can just jump really high.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:32 pm to Fewer Kilometers
that was awesome.
side note - did anyone elses showing of the film not include a trailer for suicide squad? i thought it was odd that mine did not - but did include Civil War.
side note - did anyone elses showing of the film not include a trailer for suicide squad? i thought it was odd that mine did not - but did include Civil War.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:33 pm to Thracken13
Mine didn't have either of those previews.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:34 pm to Thracken13
I think I saw the Suicide Squad trailer at all three screenings. Same with Lego Batman and X-Men. I don't think that Civil War played on any of mine.
Lego Batman got a great response, every time.
Lego Batman got a great response, every time.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:36 pm to Thracken13
Alamo Drafthouse - Civil War and Lego Batman
IMAX - Civil War and Suicide Squad
IMAX - Civil War and Suicide Squad
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:38 pm to schexyoung
i was kinda disapointed mine didn't show suicide squad at it.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 1:52 pm to lsuoilengr
quote:It sounds like you went in wanting to hate it, rather than let things play out. This is setting up MULTIPLE future movies, and it looks to have hit the box office to ensure those movies will be made. For that alone, you should want to finish this film, and learn the various setups.
This movie was so bad I walked out in the middle of it. The only other movie I did this was Vin Disel in that witch hunter movie which was horrible.
I HATED IT
quote:
-magic US bullet technology in the desert
Ties in a lot of threads. Shows that Luthor is already plotting to set Superman up for a fall in public opinion, and that he's aware of the relationship with Lois and is willing to use it. Also shows that his company is developing weapons for the US government.
quote:Some are haunted dreams of what created "Batman", others seem like visions or premonitions.
-confusing batman dreams
-long boring tangents that mean and add nothing to the story
Seems like Wayne and apparently Luthor both have these visions. Luthor's statements of demons coming from the heavens, and his motivation to kill Superman, correspond with Batman's dreams of the future. It's like they are both having these dreams, like someone is sending a message somehow. Who in the DC Universe could do this?
Luthor sees no way other than killing Superman (first, and then probably WW and the rest) to stop this threat, Batman eventually decides the formation of the JLA is the answer. Luthor distrusts the meta-humans, while Wayne finally decides that, like Superman, they would fight FOR their world, instead of against it.
quote:They see no point to their actions. Batman says criminals are like weeds, you pluck one and another springs up. He also says to Alfred something about how they've known others with good intentions, that ultimately turned bad (Two-Face? Robin/Red Hood?).
-batman/superman are extremely EMO
Superman can't buy a break; he saves the planet and his girlfriend, and has to answer before a congressional hearing for it. There are parts of society and government that are actively trying to figure ways to kill him (if need be), and protesting his existence. He just wants to make dinner for Lois and do the "right thing", when he can.
quote:Weird twist, but it keeps him off everyone's radar. Nobody takes him seriously.
Lex Luthor is a a Zac Uckerberg type nerd
Also- like Wayne, it shows he's a little unstable. Maybe this instability is what makes them both receptive to the visions of evil future Superman and the arrival of Darkseid?
quote:Totally plausible, a guy who is embittered by Superman due to his losses, and someone able to be manipulated by Luthor for the suicide bomb.
Wheelchair guy wtf?
quote:Batman in action, shows off the Batmobile and his gear. No goofier than Iron Man with his suit, IMO.
The car chase scene was terrible. GOOFY
The biggest points that aren't really easily answered are the dreams, and those may well be important Easter Eggs for the upcoming films. We are, after all, going to get additional movies. If those visions are tied in, we then come back and say they are smart devices.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 3:33 pm to Scoob
When Thor3 comes out, no one will suddenly like the visions from AoU more. It shouldn't have been in the film.
Social media is strong enough now that Marvel can release those scenes on YouTube / Facebook and most people who will see Thor 3 will have already seen them. They could have done similar with Batman's visions.
Social media is strong enough now that Marvel can release those scenes on YouTube / Facebook and most people who will see Thor 3 will have already seen them. They could have done similar with Batman's visions.
Popular
Back to top



0






