Started By
Message

re: New Doomcock Lucasfilm rumors: Kathleen Kennedy is no longer operating as head of LF

Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
25745 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

2. He gets full creative power (Disney Corp doesnt mettle)


quote:

4. Disney agrees to never ever mess with the George Lucas Star Wars movies


There's no way Disney agrees to this.
Posted by AURaptor
South
Member since Aug 2018
11958 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:52 pm to
LINK

From the comments -



Hoovy
3 hours ago
Star Wars will return to a more civilized age...

Before the dark times...

Before Kennedy...


Hail DOOMCOCK!!
Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
11689 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:44 pm to
Considering Star Wars is moving in to its High Republic era, I could see Lucas having some control over a Trilogy set in that time period.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12433 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Considering Star Wars is moving in to its High Republic era, I could see Lucas having some control over a Trilogy set in that time period.

George is 76, isn't he working on some experimental films?
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33408 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:14 pm to
So many posters dont get it. Disney is a licensing company first and foremost. Even when the economy is down they are able to make tons of money on products. The latest trilogies screwed the pooch for Disney in product sells. Because frankly, there is very little in the sequel trilogy that people want to bring home . . . . mainly because of how bad the stories were

Who is jumping up and down to but Palpatine merch? They killed Rey with that permanent association

Finn driving people to the stores?

Poe?

Rose?

The hot selling items were all created under Lucas' tenure . . . . light sabers, vader masks, the falcon, droids, storm troopers, blasters, X Wings, tie fighters. The new trilogy isnt selling much, because the sequels were either reboots or pure crap. Disney wants, no Disney craves Lucas' sappy approach to ignite merch sales, especially toys

The hottest Star Wars merch today is Baby Yoda, and he was introduced on a streaming service, not a Star Wars film. Sad, but true

Disney knows whats up. Kennedys gone, and Lucas will probably return
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22971 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

-says Disney wants George Lucas to replace Kathleen Kennedy, says Disney investors have been working him for a few months


-they ask Lucas what it would take to bring him back to LF, and he asks for 4 non-negotiable conditions that needed to be met

1. He gets to make HIS sequel trilogy

2. He gets full creative power (Disney Corp doesnt mettle)

3. Kathleen Kennedy is gone

4. Disney agrees to never ever mess with the George Lucas Star Wars movies
If this happens, I will have SO MUCH respect for ole George.

He got to cash out for 4 BILLION, and then resume total control of the franchise in less than a decade? What would he have lost, control of ILM and total earning from films?
4 B seems like a fair tradeoff

Has Lucas ever done a movie around Angola? This sounds like a Burl Cain type of deal (remember the Angola warden, who retired, then resumed as warden, while keeping his full retirement check at the same time).
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64163 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:25 pm to
And also supposedly Galaxy's edge has been a disaster at KKs direction. The imagineers originally wanted to make it centered on the OT, but then KK came in and made them center everything around the Disney trilogy.


They even had the audacity to call Anakin's lightsaber "Reys lightsaber" on the display at the star wars section.


Let's just say Kathleen did a LOT of damage to the brand in her stint.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22971 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Making a billion dollars (rise of Skywalker) means the property is dead?
A billion dollars isn't what it once was, and Disney paid out the arse for that movie. I just read a report saying RoS had less net profit than Rogue One.

You lay the Disney Star Wars movies out, and TFA (first movie) was immensely profitable (2 bil gross, 780 mil net). Big dropoff to TLJ (1.3 bil, 417 mil), RoS (1 bil, 300 mil).
Same article says Solo (which suffered the wrath of the fans for TLJ) actually was a net loss of 77 mil.
LINK

So if you're tracking the series, it cost more to make each one, and you're getting less gross each time. And as they said, you actually had a movie lose money (not a core film, but a SW film nonetheless).

That shows
a) the IP was as golden as they hoped for, with a huge opening; and
b) it's going terribly wrong.

And as others have noted, there's no merchandise coming out of this. We're into models over here, my son loves making stuff. Star Wars used to be the shite for that, as much as WW2 stuff. Nothing of note from the current trilogy worth getting.
Toys, action figures? I remember the old OT stuff, that was incredibly big. I suppose it isn't as big a deal nowadays, but there's nothing out there at all from this.
Games? Remember how big Battlefront and BF2 was? KOTOR?

The one glimmer of hope Disney has is The Mandalorian. That is not the way they envisioned this going.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24839 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:39 pm to
Lucas was great for directing the overall story and narrative. The prequels are Oscar worthy cinema compared to this batch of crap Disney produced.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

Doomcock


People here still believe what this dude spouts with his lame shtick?
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22971 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 6:26 am to
well, he's at least half-right; Kennedy is going to be out.

Some movies might be all about creative freedom, but Disney didn't spend 4 billion for that. They want guaranteed, steady profits and loyal fans.
Posted by rich4pres
Knoxville
Member since Dec 2016
11044 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 6:47 am to
I seriously doubt Lucas would even live long enough to complete another Star Wars trilogy.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
33276 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 6:57 am to
If true it goes against what George did when he sold it to Disney

In Bob Igers book that came out earlier this year, he goes in detail of Disney approaching Lucas and trying to get him to sell for years. He said Lucas finally agreed ONLY if Kennedy was head of creative and calling the shots.

Iger said they were all against it but ultimately gave in to get the deal done.

This post was edited on 7/22/20 at 6:58 am
Posted by TheeRealCarolina
Member since Aug 2018
17925 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 8:54 am to
I agree with your overall point but those Sith Trooper uniforms are fire.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
26775 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 9:11 am to
quote:

I mean, I'm no fan of KK, but Lucas isn't the answer here.


Preach brother, preach.

They should use Lucas much like Filoni and Favreau used him during the production of the Mandalorian... an advisor that you run a few ideas past. Pay him to be a consultant and a public face for LF but let someone else run the show.

I'd lean towards Favreau getting to be head of Lucasfilm but does he want the job of over seeing the entire studio or is he just desperate to make sure that Kennedy isn't the one in charge?

Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
33276 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 9:16 am to
After watching the making of The Mandalorian, Favreau and Waititi are ultimate fan boys and get it.

I say give them the keys to the car and it’ll be in good hands for the next 20 years.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58310 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 9:27 am to
quote:

So many here kick and scream about how studios should not interfere with directors but then turn around and say studios should interfere with directors.



What? When you build a universe and have movies that are made about that universe, there is someone who manages that. Feige had this responsibility with Marvel. And yes, he pointed writers/directers in the right direction.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52917 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 9:44 am to
Lucas has vision.

He is just a shitty scriptwriter and shouldn’t be given sole creative authority.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
25745 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

And also supposedly Galaxy's edge has been a disaster at KKs direction. The imagineers originally wanted to make it centered on the OT, but then KK came in and made them center everything around the Disney trilogy.


This is a thorn in the side of Disney. Purchasing Star Wars was really about merchandising and branding. Make a Star Wars land and get asses through the gate. Sell a bunch of Star Wars merch while the guests are there.

No one is interested in the new trilogy, and from what I understand - pre covid - park visitation was well below projections.

No one is excited about the new trilogy, and certainly isn't spending that kind of money and time to visit a land dedicated to the new trilogy.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32758 posts
Posted on 7/22/20 at 3:28 pm to
Park director got canned for the Galaxy’s Edge release IIRC
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram