Started By
Message

re: Maester's Thread - A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms (S1, HBO) - Book Spoilers

Posted on 2/3/26 at 12:59 pm to
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108050 posts
Posted on 2/3/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

I would guess that the fan theories here will be more interesting than the actual source material, either in the existing writing, writing to come or in the future of the TV show

The GoT TV adaptation has already dropped the ball on the bloodraven storyline, and it does not appear that the book series will advance any further. Fun to speculate though


I mean we definitely get him as the Three-Eyed Raven later in GoT. But we don't get a whole lot of him as a younger version except in the D&E novellas.

Then you have this from what will be Season 3 (The Mystery Knight):

quote:

"How many eyes does Lord Bloodraven have? the riddle ran. A thousand eyes, and one. Some claimed the King's Hand was a student of the dark arts who could change his face, put on the likeness of a one-eyed dog, even turn into a mist. Packs of gaunt gray wolves hunted down his foes, men said, and carrion crows spied for him and whispered secrets in his ear. Most of the tales were only tales, Dunk did not doubt, but no one could doubt that Bloodraven had informers everywhere."[16]

—thoughts of Duncan the Tall


There's a shite ton of speculation based on what is written that he is also Maynard Plumm in The Mystery Knight. Dunk even picks up on him being "off".

Westeros.org Maynard Plumm theories

ETA: I don't think it's just fan speculation as there's some legitimately solid info in the novellas that he has some powers (before becoming the Three Eyed Raven).
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4337 posts
Posted on 2/3/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:


I could be misremembering but Dunk wasn’t approached about fixing the joust(winning) in the books correct?


I certainly don't recall that either but why in the hell would they need to ask someone to WIN on purpose? Dunk has zero reason to be a part of any scheme that requires him to win because he should be trying his hardest to do that on purpose anyways.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9040 posts
Posted on 2/3/26 at 2:48 pm to
They need Dunk to challenge Sir Andros, which he otherwise wouldn’t have done bc Sir Andros is much better than him on paper. At least for his first fight he would’ve chosen someone more his own level.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65581 posts
Posted on 2/3/26 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

why in the hell would they need to ask someone to WIN on purpose?
I think because they want Dunk to challenge the Ashford guy. Ashford is a good jouster, so if he challenged Dunk, he'd be called out for trying to get an easy win. If Dunk challenges him, it looks like some overconfident upstart trying to beat a good jouster, so people would bet against Dunk, except for the people in on the fix. But yeah, it didn't happen in the book.
quote:

There's a shite ton of speculation based on what is written that he is also Maynard Plumm in The Mystery Knight. Dunk even picks up on him being "off".
He's almost certainly Plumm, which is clever because the real Plumms do have some Targ blood, through bastards raised by cucks.
Posted by IHitthaLONGBALL
Member since Jul 2024
195 posts
Posted on 2/3/26 at 4:36 pm to
This was my issue with it. It basically will make a portion of The Mystery knight seem like a repeat.

Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
11083 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 8:00 am to
So I admit Martin put some hints in the books that Dunk was never knighted.

But it’s not 100%.

I still think during some important moment in the show we’ll get a flashback to a death bed knighting and then Dunk kicks someone’s arse. May not be a full proper knighting, but a knighting nonetheless.

There’s a scene in every book where you could do that.
This post was edited on 2/4/26 at 8:02 am
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42471 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

So I admit Martin put some hints in the books that Dunk was never knighted.

But it’s not 100%.


He wasn't knighted.

But it doesn't matter that he wasn't knighted, maybe Arlan was going to knight him at some point anyway but it doesn't matter. He's a knight now whether Arlan knighted him or not.

Even the show runner, which is essentially GRRM telling us that it doesn't matter because Duncans actions and honor make him a knight in spirit. That's all that matter s at this point.

Reading the books a few times now and it wasn't until this thread that I ever gave any thought to it mattering. Does Arlan on his death bed and probably iout of it saying "You're a knight now" or whatever they would say make Duncan a better knight or person than he is now? No, not at all.
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
11083 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 9:36 am to
I’m just picturing a scene where Dunk is getting his arse kicked and is told he’s not a knight, then there’s a flashback to the dying Arlen knighting him, and then Dunk takes it to 11 in the fight.

Doesn’t matter, you’re right, but that’d be a good scene.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65581 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:56 am to
I could see that, Arlan dying halfway through knighting him or something like that. It would definitely take readers by surprise, but the line in the book about how Dunk knew what it was like to tell a big lie is hard to get around. That's why I say maybe Ser Arlan died while doing it, so it doesn't t4echnically count but was surely intended.

But the king can knight people too, so maybe there's a future chapter where Egg becomes king and secretly knights Dunk. Either way, I also agree that it doesn't matter.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12256 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 2:58 pm to
I don't remeber how it went down in the books but in my mind, the second Baelor vouches for him to fight in the tourney, he's a legitimate knight. I mean thats about the highest voice you can get to give you validity.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65581 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:20 pm to
Oh definitely. He'll never be questioned again, unless it's discovered that he vouched under a false pretense, which it won't be.

We're just wondering if we'll ever get a flashback telling us for sure, but I doubt we will.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12758 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Because we all need to talk about this shite right here:

That’s all it would be, because will never see it, and GRRM will never write it.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21051 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:15 pm to
I know this is based on speculation, but it’s sad to think of this sweet kid growing up and burning his entire family in a deluded attempt to hatch dragons.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79943 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:27 pm to
I’m very curious of the circumstances. Did Egg go mad or was it truly an accident? Did he use wildfire?
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21051 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

I’m very curious of the circumstances. Did Egg go mad or was it truly an accident? Did he use wildfire?


As far as I know it’s not actually confirmed, but that seems to be a popular theory. I’m not sure we’ll ever get an answer.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 7:32 pm
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79943 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:35 pm to
The only published info on Summerhall is the fragmented statement by a maester from Fire & Blood

quote:

the blood of the dragon gathered in one …
… seven eggs, to honor the seven gods, though the king's own septon had warned …
… pyromancers …
… wild fire …
… flames grew out of control … towering … burned so hot that …
… died, but for the valor of the Lord Comman …[2]


I think it’ll eventually be revealed. Could there have been sabotage by a septon or pyromancer or just some anti-Targaryen guy? So many questions!
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
11083 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

I think it’ll eventually be revealed. Could there have been sabotage by a septon or pyromancer or just some anti-Targaryen guy? So many questions!


He was successful and hatched a dragon or two and the maesters of the citadel tried to take out the dragons and all of house Targaryen.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79943 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

He was successful and hatched a dragon or two and the maesters of the citadel tried to take out the dragons and all of house Targaryen.


Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79943 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:57 pm to
Have y’all heard the theory that the 7 were there incarnate to guide Dunk along?

Father- Baelor
Mother- inn keeper
Crone- prophecy lady
Smith- steely pate
Warrior- Robin Rhysling
Maid- tanselle
Stranger- maekar

Stole this from the house of R pod but found it interesting
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 8:58 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65581 posts
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:14 pm to
If so, it's only on the show.

Rhysling is also believed to represent Odin, who was always said to be wandering the world as a one-eyed old man. Bloodraven is also symbolic of Odin.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 9:43 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram