- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House of the Dragon - Episode 2.2 - Spoilers okay
Posted on 6/24/24 at 9:46 am to Jorts R Us
Posted on 6/24/24 at 9:46 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
I'd say they want everyone on Team Female. The've watered down the culpability of both of the main women for the escalation.
ETA: You can downvote it if you want but it's demonstrably true. Alicent just misunderstood Viserys on his death bed and Rhaenyra and Dameon are at odds over how the Blacks responded to the death of Lucerys? Look, I'm not saying the liberties they are taking are bad for the story but you can't really argue it's not the angle they've taken.
Both women have already lost children/grandchildren in this war and it really hasn’t even gotten going yet. That’s far from “watered down culpability”.
It’s also FAR too early to say this is the case. I’m also not sure how you can say this is a female centric thing when Daemon has done pretty horrible shite without any real culpability. He just takes his ball and flies off to wherever when he gets called on it.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 9:47 am to Jebadeb
quote:Right here. TG baby!! Can't wait to see how the showrunners shite all over us again next week and then make the bastard whore and her team of DEI hires look like victim/heroes!!
Also, do any fans pull for the Greens?
quote:Yep!! They find a new way to crank up the hate on Cole every episode. And adult Aegon is quickly becoming one of my favorites. Sure they make him into an impetuous twat but at least he has a fricking personality.
Criston and Aegon are so unlikeable.
This post was edited on 6/24/24 at 10:07 am
Posted on 6/24/24 at 9:53 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
I'm not saying the liberties they are taking are bad for the story but you can't really argue it's not the angle they've taken.
I would argue that the angle the are taking is that people aren't as competent as history makes them seem. Things don't always go as planned but history makes every move seem purposeful.
And its not like they are only removing culpability from the women, they made Vhagar killing Luke and Arrax an accident too.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 9:58 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
And its not like they are only removing culpability from the women, they made Vhagar killing Luke and Arrax an accident too.
That's a fair point but they are still heavily casting Alicent and Rhaenyra as victims of circumstances. That's not true to the book, especially with respect to Alicent.
Again, it doesn't mean it doesn't work but it's a noticeable difference.
This post was edited on 6/24/24 at 10:13 am
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:06 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Both women have already lost children/grandchildren in this war and it really hasn’t even gotten going yet. That’s far from “watered down culpability”. It’s also FAR too early to say this is the case. I’m also not sure how you can say this is a female centric thing when Daemon has done pretty horrible shite without any real culpability. He just takes his ball and flies off to wherever when he gets called on it.
You're not speaking to culpability, though. Investment and loss is not culpability.
As for Daemon, you're talking about accountability, not culpability. The show very obviously shows his role in escalating this conflict. With Alicent and Rhaenyra they are adding things to the story that weren't in the books that cast them in a better light.
This post was edited on 6/24/24 at 10:08 am
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:18 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
its not like they are only removing culpability from the women, they made Vhagar killing Luke and Arrax an accident too.
Maybe an accident for Aemond but clearly the dragon meant to do it.
This post was edited on 6/24/24 at 10:19 am
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:25 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
The've watered down the culpability of both of the main women for the escalation.
Idk how one could possibly think this about Alicent especially after last night’s episode. I think the episode did a good job of showing just how incompetent a lot of people are surrounding both Greens and Blacks. The only ones not acting impetuous are Corlys/Rhaenys for the Blacks and Otto for the Greens. Everyone else just can’t get out of their own way and keep fricking everything up
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:26 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
Maybe an accident for Aemond but clearly the dragon meant to do it.
Truth. I actually saw a youtube video where they said that given the bond between dragon and rider, Vhagar could feel the emotions of hate that Aemond felt toward Luke and while Aemond's words said "No", his emotions said "Yes" which is why Vhagar did what she did.
Kind of interesting imo.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:27 am to Esquire
The brothers said it was Erryk that won the fight and kills himself, so the problem is with the choreography and editing.
I just watched the scene again.
Erryk 100% gets his thigh slashed by Arryk. Immediately after that slash, Arryk turns to cut down Rhaenyra as she runs away and Erryk tackles him into the vase. At some point after that, the leg wound switches twins.
USA Today interview with twins
I just watched the scene again.
Erryk 100% gets his thigh slashed by Arryk. Immediately after that slash, Arryk turns to cut down Rhaenyra as she runs away and Erryk tackles him into the vase. At some point after that, the leg wound switches twins.
quote:
It's hard to tell, but Arryk is on the offensive most of the fight, with Erryk playing defense — not wanting to kill his brother but protecting his defenseless queen. When the final sword thrust reveals itself, it's Erryk sobbing and hugging the brother he's just run his sword through.
"You get to see the real human side of him pierce through," says Elliott, who was pleased to "show the world the connection we have as twins in the end."
With the assassin-brother dead, Erryk steps towards the still wary Queen before proclaiming, "Your grace, forgive me." To the shock and horror of all, the distraught knight impales himself on his sword. The legendary double tragedy is complete.
"The pain Erryk felt when he kills his brother is the most intense feeling he's ever felt," says Elliott. "When he says, 'Forgive me' he's saying it to Rhyneara because he's about to sacrifice himself in front of her. But it's also directed towards his brother."
USA Today interview with twins
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:27 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
You're not speaking to culpability, though. Investment and loss is not culpability.
As for Daemon, you're talking about accountability, not culpability. The show very obviously shows his role in escalating this conflict. With Alicent and Rhaenyra they are adding things to the story that weren't in the books that cast them in a better light.
Culpability by its definition is responsibility for wrongdoing or failure.
And you’re purposefully omitting the fact that the book comes from multiple viewpoints of observers and folks with agendas. It makes sense we would see things in live action that aren’t just a second-hand retelling of Mushroom and a Maester.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:32 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Daemon is a great character and Matt Smith plays him perfectly. But I'm struggling to find a reason to like him at this point as well. I thought he was going to be a Jamie type character where he has redeeming qualities despite that bad, but there's not much redeeming about him other than being a good character, which really isn't enough.
This is where I’m at too. The Rogue Prince thing was cool in Season 1 and him walking to his brother and helping him up the stairs to the Iron Throne and placing the crown on Viserys was my favorite moment of Season 1. But it’s been downhill for him ever since. Him talking shite about his brother and even Rhaenyra during their fight left me just disappointed. Thought he had gotten over that
But I can also see why GRRM said Daemon was one of his favorite characters he has written.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:41 am to WicKed WayZ
quote:
This is where I’m at too. The Rogue Prince thing was cool in Season 1 and him walking to his brother and helping him up the stairs to the Iron Throne and placing the crown on Viserys was my favorite moment of Season 1. But it’s been downhill for him ever since. Him talking shite about his brother and even Rhaenyra during their fight left me just disappointed. Thought he had gotten over that
But I can also see why GRRM said Daemon was one of his favorite characters he has written.
I see it as he is a man that does love his family but at his core is very selfish. So at times he helps his family and seems like a good guy but eventually his selfishness always comes to the surface and influences his actions.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 10:43 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Culpability by its definition is responsibility for wrongdoing or failure.
I'm aware of the definition. You bringing up that Alicent and Rhaenyra have skin in the game as if though that speaks to their culpability made me question if you were.
quote:
And you’re purposefully omitting the fact that the book comes from multiple viewpoints of observers and folks with agendas. It makes sense we would see things in live action that aren’t just a second-hand retelling of Mushroom and a Maester.
I'm not purposefully omitting anything. If anything, the multiple viewpoints strengthens my argument. 3 different accounts and none of them suggest this hole thing was ignited by Alicent misunderstanding Viserys. That is a deliberate angle.
I'll say it again, it doesn't mean I dislike the direction. They've essentially just added a fourth account of the events and I'm sharing my observation on their take. You can disagree with that if you like but you might try attacking the position rather than suggesting I'm being deceitful.
This post was edited on 6/24/24 at 10:46 am
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:20 am to Esquire
quote:
The brothers said it was Erryk that won the fight and kills himself, so the problem is with the choreography and editing.
I just watched the scene again.
Erryk 100% gets his thigh slashed by Arryk. Immediately after that slash, Arryk turns to cut down Rhaenyra as she runs away and Erryk tackles him into the vase. At some point after that, the leg wound switches twins.
quote:
It's hard to tell, but Arryk is on the offensive most of the fight, with Erryk playing defense — not wanting to kill his brother but protecting his defenseless queen. When the final sword thrust reveals itself, it's Erryk sobbing and hugging the brother he's just run his sword through.
"You get to see the real human side of him pierce through," says Elliott, who was pleased to "show the world the connection we have as twins in the end."
With the assassin-brother dead, Erryk steps towards the still wary Queen before proclaiming, "Your grace, forgive me." To the shock and horror of all, the distraught knight impales himself on his sword. The legendary double tragedy is complete.
"The pain Erryk felt when he kills his brother is the most intense feeling he's ever felt," says Elliott. "When he says, 'Forgive me' he's saying it to Rhyneara because he's about to sacrifice himself in front of her. But it's also directed towards his brother."
If this is true, they really messed up that scene. It 100% looked as though the Balck twin lost and the Green twin won and killed himself. I do agree that the actions post fight were much more believable if the blacks twin won BUT we all saw the fight turn when the green twin grabbed the leg wound that we all saw inflicted on the black twin.
Honestly with this show making the Valyrians dark skinned for ease of distinguishing one family from another, I am shocked that they didn't make it more obvious which twin was which. But I guess they kind of had to make them indistinguishable to show why no one else could get involved to tip the scales.
I would hope going forward that Rhaenyra would make some sort of change to her kings guard uniforms so she can accurately distinguish her real guards from imposters. But then again, there aren't any more identical twins that we know of.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:27 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
I'm aware of the definition. You bringing up that Alicent and Rhaenyra have skin in the game as if though that speaks to their culpability made me question if you were.
The deaths of those children were because of the conflict that has started due, in part, to their actions (or inaction). That is absolutely a heavy consequence for both women. Both women carry the weight of that and we’ve seen that portrayed (neither is living a happy life at this point as a result). And we’re all of two episodes into the season, so it’s very premature to say (ignoring the loss of family) that they won’t be held culpable. In the books they very much were (and I don’t see those ends drastically changing on screen).
quote:
I'm not purposefully omitting anything. If anything, the multiple viewpoints strengthens my argument. 3 different accounts and none of them suggest this hole thing was ignited by Alicent misunderstanding Viserys. That is a deliberate angle.
We’re watching what happened in real time, without a narrative. The truth is usually somewhere inbetween the written narrative in most cases. The show is being true to that IMO.
This post was edited on 6/24/24 at 11:29 am
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:39 am to Draco Malfoy
I swear to god, if Game of Thrones were to make its debut this year, most of you would be Team Joffrey. Y’all would have also cheered when Ned Stark was decapitated and during the Red Wedding.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:45 am to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
I swear to god, if Game of Thrones were to make its debut this year, most of you would be Team Joffrey. Y’all would have also cheered when Ned Stark was decapitated and during the Red Wedding.
What the frick is this about?
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:52 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
That's a fair point but they are still heavily casting Alicent and Rhaenyra as victims of circumstances. That's not true to the book, especially with respect to Alicent.
Again, it doesn't mean it doesn't work but it's a noticeable difference.
But really Alicent is a product of being Otto's child. He was placing her in positions to manipulate and gain power since she was a teenager.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:57 am to Epic Cajun
But she played games with both her husband and best friend when Otto didn’t tell her to. She employed Laryse knowing what he was and she’s done other devious shite like the Cole situation. Dunno how people can’t see what she is.
Posted on 6/24/24 at 11:58 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
I'm not purposefully omitting anything. If anything, the multiple viewpoints strengthens my argument. 3 different accounts and none of them suggest this hole thing was ignited by Alicent misunderstanding Viserys. That is a deliberate angle.
I'll say it again, it doesn't mean I dislike the direction. They've essentially just added a fourth account of the events and I'm sharing my observation on their take. You can disagree with that if you like but you might try attacking the position rather than suggesting I'm being deceitful.
You obviously know that the book is essentially just a history of what happened, in order to create a coherent television show they have to add some reasons why things occur and occasionally these are things that happen behind closed doors that can't possibly be known by anyone except those involved in the happenings. If they would just follow the books the only scenes that would occur would have to happen with Mushroom or the Maester in the room. There would be zero scenes with just Alicent and Viserys.
Popular
Back to top



1




