- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Final Trailer for 'Supergirl' | DCU Studios
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:09 pm to VermilionTiger
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:09 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
That girl looks like a massive count
She's ugly. She knows it, Gunn knows it, so as soon as somebody says the movie sucks they'll turn it into some scripted sexist crusade
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:31 pm to NighthawkDawg
Spider-Man and Deadpool movies are still making a billion every time out so it isn’t that. Relying on paid for and vetted reviews isn’t a very good way to determine something’s success. That argument was debunked 7 years ago.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:33 pm to Corso
quote:
She's ugly.
I wouldn’t kick her out of bed for eating crackers.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:37 pm to finchmeister08
Maybe I’m crazy but I think she’s hot.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 12:34 am to Madking
You’re not crazy. Just very, very severely autistic.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 1:29 am to BlacknGold
And all you do is make ad hominem attacks because factually your arguments are inept
Posted on 6/5/26 at 10:17 am to Madking
Spider-Man is an extremely massive IP with a strong track record of recent solid movies not to mention No Way Home had insane hype due to Tobey and Andrew being in it
Deadpool also had nostalgia bait and a solid recent track record of good films
Also funny how you continue to ignore the popcorn meter which is literally just a rating done by the general public
Deadpool also had nostalgia bait and a solid recent track record of good films
Also funny how you continue to ignore the popcorn meter which is literally just a rating done by the general public
Posted on 6/5/26 at 10:42 am to NighthawkDawg
Posted on 6/5/26 at 10:55 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 6/5/26 at 11:14 am to RLDSC FAN
Before she got her teeth fixed and changed her hair to cover up her forehead (or in her case, fivehead), Milly Alcock sort of looked like she had Down Syndrome.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 11:26 am to RLDSC FAN
Is it just me or does that shot look pretty bad? Like you can tell the background isn’t real
Posted on 6/5/26 at 11:29 am to Proximo
A lot of what we've seen looks pretty mediocre, IMO.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 11:34 am to NighthawkDawg
Hard to discuss something with people who don’t read the posts they respond to.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 2:53 pm to Madking
Posted on 6/5/26 at 3:35 pm to RLDSC FAN
Yes, all the negative things everyone here have said about this movie and MA’s looks and her stupid comments are all true.
But I guess I’m a sucker for superhero movies still.
I’ll wait til it’s in HBOMax, but I’ll watch it.
But I guess I’m a sucker for superhero movies still.
I’ll wait til it’s in HBOMax, but I’ll watch it.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 3:47 pm to NighthawkDawg
quote:
but Superman, Thunderbolts, and Fantastic Four have all done extremely well in both the critic and fan review parts as evident by their RT and Metacritic scores
Hmm, maybe that should tell you a bit about how RT is doing things rather than what people think about the movies. Superman has a 7/10 rating on IMDB, FF has 6.8/10, Thunderbolts 7.1/10, which matches up much better with what people I know think about them as well as how they performed in their second and onwards weekends. If a movie impresses audiences it will have good word of mouth and sustain success. Project Hail Mary and Obsession are both recent examples of that in action.
The response to the three you just mentioned was more along the lines of it was decent, but wait for streaming (except FF, I don't know anyone personally that was impressed with that). Whereas with Project Hail Mary I had a bunch of people I know ask if I had seen it and suggest I watch it if not.
I personally thought Superman was a solid popcorn flick, but ultimately forgettable and I don't have a real urge to rewatch (7/10 is about where I would rate it). My wife liked it much less, and none of the high school students I teach that have mentioned it were very impressed. If you aren't appealing to Gen X like myself, millennials like my wife, or the youngsters, you are going to have a hard time making money.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 3:59 pm to RLDSC FAN
Let me clear this up here. I like the casting. Never had a problem with it
Wish she did better promoting her film, and that she had better media training.
I think this movie, like Superman, will be fine at worst.
That said:
If that holds. . .and this is all speculative based on projections, and just for the frick of it. . .
. . .this put the total worldwide take at $402 million. Will that be enough to break even?
Wish she did better promoting her film, and that she had better media training.
I think this movie, like Superman, will be fine at worst.
That said:
quote:
Superman and The Batman all “came on the boards” at around $85 million.
quote:I mean that is 65%
Supergirl’ is tracking with $55M+ U.S. opening weekend
If that holds. . .and this is all speculative based on projections, and just for the frick of it. . .
. . .this put the total worldwide take at $402 million. Will that be enough to break even?
Posted on 6/5/26 at 4:01 pm to Roaad
I asked AI:
quote:
Estimates for the break-even point of the Supergirl movie vary significantly depending on the source and the assumed marketing budget.
Deadline Report: Claims a break-even point of $315 million worldwide, based on a $175 million production budget (excluding marketing).
Industry Standard (2.5x Rule): Most analysts argue the film needs between $425 million and $500 million worldwide. This calculation applies the standard 2.5x multiplier to production budgets estimated between $170 million and $200 million, which implicitly accounts for typical marketing and distribution costs.
Forbes/Reddit Estimates: If the $200 million production budget is accurate, the break-even point is estimated at $500 million.
The $315 million figure is widely considered unusually low by industry watchers because it does not appear to include the substantial marketing (P&A) costs, which typically range from $100 million to $150 million for major superhero releases.
Posted on 6/5/26 at 4:09 pm to Roaad
Here is Grok's answer:
LINK
quote:
Supergirl (2026 film, also known as Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow) has a reported production budget of about $175 million.
This is the most recent figure from Deadline (June 3, 2026), which describes it as "$175M net before global P&A spend." Earlier rumors ranged from $100M (dismissed) to $200M (denied by James Gunn as "not even a little bit true"), with other reports landing in the $165–175M range.
Adding Promotion, Advertising, and Other Costs (P&A)P&A (prints and advertising = global marketing, trailers, ads, premieres, etc.) is not included in the $175M production budget. For a tentpole superhero movie like this, P&A typically runs $100–140 million (sometimes more for wide international pushes).
Total studio investment (production + P&A): Roughly $275–315 million (conservative estimate).
How Much Box Office It Needs to Break Even (and Earn a Profit)
Studios don’t keep 100% of ticket sales—theaters take a big cut (roughly 50% worldwide on average, though it varies by market and week). So the studio’s share of the box office has to cover the full costs above.Standard industry math (the “2–2.5× rule of thumb” for break-even on theatrical alone):Break-even box office ˜ 2–2.5× total costs (production + marketing).
Using Deadline’s $175M production figure + realistic P&A ? $550–650 million worldwide to break even.
Deadline’s reported figure says the film only needs $315 million worldwide to break even.
This has drawn heavy skepticism from analysts because it appears to undercount or exclude full global marketing costs. Many industry voices argue the realistic theatrical break-even is closer to $425–600 million (or higher if marketing balloons).
To Actually Earn a Profit Break-even (covers costs, no loss/no gain): ~$550–650 million worldwide (most realistic range when adding promotion/advertising).
Modest profit: $700–800 million+ (covers costs + some return; ancillaries like streaming rights, merch, and home video add extra upside).
Big win (the kind studios love): $1 billion+ (rare for female-led superhero films but possible with strong legs).
Bottom line: Supergirl needs to gross roughly $550–650 million worldwide at the box office (after adding in promotion and advertising) just to break even on theatrical revenue. Anything above that starts turning a profit, with the exact number depending on final marketing spend and how well it performs internationally. Early tracking (as of June 2026) shows a solid $55M+ U.S. opening projection, but the full run will decide if it clears the line.
These are pre-release estimates—actual profitability also factors in tax incentives, streaming deals, and merchandise, which can help a lot. But on pure box-office math (what your question asks), that’s the range.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/5/26 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 6/5/26 at 4:13 pm to Roaad
quote:
this put the total worldwide take at $402 million. Will that be enough to break even?
400 mil would be a very good number for this movie
Popular
Back to top



1







