Started By
Message

re: Fantastic Four Review Thread 86% RT Score 111 Reviews

Posted on 7/30/25 at 1:17 pm to
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Yes, this is a better movie, but I still prefer the Rise of the Silver Surfer to this. It's an inferior movie in terms of quality and direction, but it's still way more fun than this one with more comic accurate characters.
I think I’ve seen the original F4 years ago. I can’t remember if I liked it. Never seen The Silver Surfer one. I watched half of the Josh Trank one and it was awful.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60088 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

‘Fantastic Four: First Steps’ $170M Promo Push Boosted By Little Caesars, Zillow, Pop-Tarts & More

At $170 million in media value, the promotional partner campaign for Disney/Marvel Studios’ The Fantastic Four: First Steps is the biggest in some time, ahead of the pushes for Marvel Cinematic Universe’s Deadpool & Wolverine and Black Panther: Wakanda Forever and even rival studio summer campaigns such as Jurassic World Rebirth ($150M).


The movie starring Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Julia Garner is expected to make around $45M in its second weekend at the box office with a firm grip on No. 1. By Sunday, a $200M running total stateside is likely. Two newcomers — Universal/DreamWorks Animation’s The Bad Guys 2 and Paramount’s hopeful revival of big-screen comedies, The Naked Gun — look to open to $20M and $15M, respectively.



LINK
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
13249 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 1:55 pm to
So is this thing going to make money? Looks like Superman kicked its arse this weekend.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 1:59 pm to
It’ll make money. But a very underwhelming performance for this and Thunderbolts. I think Marvel is more concerned than DC right now. Which is wild to say.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
28553 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

The power-creep, the bastardization of characters by creating "families" or "universes" which are all just some form of derivative of the main character and the age-locking of most characters at their prime selling age (instead of letting them age out then get replaced by new characters) have watered DC and Marvel down to the point of rarely being good stories about their characters having to get through more down-to-earth issues and either some multiversal omnipotent danger (because endangering a mere single universe is no longer enough) or provide some far-left social lecture.



spot on


quote:

It's no coincidence that the best-performing Marvel movies have pulled almost exclusively from the pre-2000 stories and pre-2000 characters (and then remained true to those stories and characters, unlike something like Kraven for example).


Amazing, huh? If the MCU stays focused on when comics were actually good with engaging stories, it will thrive.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93280 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:37 pm to
quote:


It’ll make money. But a very underwhelming performance for this and Thunderbolts. I think Marvel is more concerned than DC right now. Which is wild to say.
and their most beloved director, James Gunn, is making DC movies instead of Marvel
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60088 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:42 pm to
I think they'll turn it around. Audiences seem to have enjoyed Thunderbolts and F4. They need to get people back on the bandwagon and this is a good start. Next year they have Spider-Man and Doomsday. Both should be massive hits.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93280 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I think they'll turn it around. Audiences seem to have enjoyed Thunderbolts and F4. They need to get people back on the bandwagon and this is a good start. Next year they have Spider-Man and Doomsday. Both should be massive hits.
i'm as die-hard marvel as a person can get having been buying marvel comics since the mid 1970s.

but i still haven't see Eternals, Kang Jai (or whatefver that kung fu movie was), either of the Ms. Marvel movies or either black panther movies
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37521 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Everything seems to come incredibly easily to Marvel's first family. Reed happens to have already been working on the technology they need to win the day. Johnny translates and learns a whole alien language in a couple of months (I assume? The timeline of events is also pretty slippery). Sue is exactly powerful enough for whatever needs to happen at the time.



Fair

Johnny becoming an alien translator, Sue being able to push an immortal being, Reed having the wherewithal to transport Earth (in orbit with appropriate velocity and orientation?!?) or trap/transport Galactus.

There's a lot of leaps there. Just ignore them or you won't be able to enjoy the movie.

quote:



Johnny translating an alien language was absurd, and it was the worst part of this movie. Sue was OP


Those were both problems. The Surfer was the only being (besides Franklin) with the power necessary to even slightly budge Galactus.

Other random thoughts:

There was a lot of montage to fill in fan references and history (in some ways and origin story).

They didn't make Ben's SO blind which was an interesting choice.

Vanessa Kirby (no relation?) did well with what she was given. But, and I know this isn't PC, the early character arcs including Namor, etc would have required her to be more beautiful (Rosamund Pike or Charlize Theron).

Chris Evans actually did a good cocky Johnny Storm even if Reed and Sue weren't good in the 2005 version. We haven't had a great Reed yet. Ben with the beard looks a little like a wooden Indian but I didn't hate it.

Galactus was really good overall. Usually he's drawn like a big power ranger but he was imposing and appropriate superficially. The only herald I like was the original SS but I won't dwell on that. Johnny didn't have to fall in love with him or her to raise the obvious ethnics of exterminating living worlds

On the balance I liked it well enough to give it a soft recommendation. It is better than the prior movies with different casts
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
3293 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Vanessa Kirby (no relation?) did well with what she was given. But, and I know this isn't PC, the early character arcs including Namor, etc would have required her to be more beautiful (Rosamund Pike or Charlize Theron).

I'd take Kirby over either.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

I think they'll turn it around. Audiences seem to have enjoyed Thunderbolts and F4. They need to get people back on the bandwagon and this is a good start. Next year they have Spider-Man and Doomsday. Both should be massive hits.
I think they had to regain some credibility after Cap 4 and some other garbage. We just have to hope these numbers are the repercussions of that and things are starting to turn around. Really both DC and Marvel had to regain some credibility.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12749 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 8:52 pm to
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
20072 posts
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:09 am to
My thoughts.

The story was all over the place. The acting was bland with little cohesion.

Pedro is a terrible Reed. Zero charisma. If he is to lead the Avengers then holy shite MCU is in trouble.

Stranger Things Johnny Storm was also a bad choice.

The speech Sue gave was cringe.

Why waste time with the love story with Ben?

Overall the acting was just bad and the story was meh.





Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35381 posts
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

but i still haven't see Eternals, Kang Jai (or whatefver that kung fu movie was), either of the Ms. Marvel movies or either black panther movies


Shang-Chi is a fun movie (especially the first two acts); the rest you definitely can skip.


The first Black Panther is meh... the problem is that T'Challa's best character arc occurred in Civil War and that really didn't leave much for him to do. He definitely shined in the movies where there's a lot more going on (Infinity War, Civil War); he's also hurt by his supporting cast. Aside from M'Baku, Killmonger, and Okoye... the rest is highly forgettable or straight up annoying. M'Baku isn't really active until the third act and Killmonger is the villain so yeah.

The best "Black Panther" movie is Civil War.

Everything else you listed is WORSE then meh - they're straight up bad. The only on-screen charisma in the second Marvel movie is Iman Vellani and her character's family, and that's not enough to break free of the black hole that is Brie Larson.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59245 posts
Posted on 7/31/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

but i still haven't see Eternals, Kang Jai (or whatefver that kung fu movie was), either of the Ms. Marvel movies or either black panther movies


Eternals is a tale of horribly fumbled potential (see also: Namor)

Shang Chi was okay. It was fun but a bit predictable.

Captain Marvel suffered mainly from Brie Larson's inability to act her way out of a wet paper bag along with a character who written with the personality and warmth of an unplugged Coke machine. A wooden actress playing a wooden part isn't what audiences are clamoring for.

The Marvels had story potential but it was really written by women for women... and contained Brie Larson as the continuingly uninspiring Captain Marvel. No young males are going to find a planet that sings and dances as a form of communication to be more fun than a good ol' slug-match. And who reads the most superhero comics? Young males.

The first Black Panther movie was fun, probably top of the middle part of the pack of Marvel movies. The second one was pretty bad, even without the brownwashing of Namor.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60088 posts
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:45 pm to
From deadline...Low 40s would be a big drop. Disappointing considering it's being well received

quote:

FRIDAY PM UPDATE: A bit of a calm spell before the Freakier Friday-Weapons double bill happening next weekend, with The Fantastic Four: First Steps eyeing around $12 million today for a $40M-$45M second weekend, which gets it close to $200M+ (or $198M on the low end). On the low side, that’s a 66% decline in the vicinity of Captain America: Brave New World (-68%), but harder than Thunderbolts* (-56%) which indicates the front-loaded rush to Marvel’s first family. The pic is booked at 4,125 theaters.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:52 pm to
I’m taking my kids to see it tomorrow. At least it’ll be a quiet theater I guess.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60088 posts
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:59 pm to
I'm heading out in a bit to watch it with some friends. I've heard good things from many people. Everyone who watches it seems to enjoy it, but word of mouth just isn't spreading.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12749 posts
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

word of mouth just isn't spreading.

Marvel has burned some bridges and their streaming/movie strategy was a failure.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 8/2/25 at 12:22 am to
Watched it tonight. Disclaimer, I'm not a F4 fan at all.

I thought it was good, if not incredibly predictable. I LOVED the 50's future setting of this universe. That brought my experience from a solid 6 to an 8.

I definitely enjoyed Superman more, but for a Friday night with nothing to do, it was fine.
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram