Started By
Message

Anyone else enjoy Star Wars I-II-III?

Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:44 am
Posted by FAT SEXY
California
Member since Jun 2020
2466 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:44 am
*This might be a redundant topic (occasionally)*

These movies seem to be fun to hate on amongst the elitists.. and baws, I get why.

They have their warts, but I still find that they have huge replay value.

The fight scenes in particular are top notch IMO.

Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3670 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 2:01 am to
I was so amped up for these films.
After a couple of years neither of the sat well with me.
I dont think I ever re-watched any of them.

Ive rewatched 4,5,6 over 10x.

The Fight scenes for Darth Maul was Elite.
He should have lived longer and haunted the Jedi Through out the series up into his death.

After A while, I watched a break down of I,II, III.
I agreed with a lot of the critisisms they made and many of the points they argued. I did Enjoy 1.
And Jar Jar Binks really got on my nerves.
I dont think Lucas made a great Director, Even Writer Either, which he chose to take on for these films. Which He didnt write 4,5,6 and you can tell.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 2:03 am
Posted by swagsurfin7
Founder of the Alex Morgan Fan Club
Member since Dec 2009
7332 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 2:04 am to
Many people have had a change of heart since the abomination that was the sequel trilogy. The prequels are held in much higher regard now for sure lol

However, they're still not great movies. The dialogue is still really bad at times, and the green screen sets stand out big time. I was a kid when Episode 1 came out, so I'll always have a soft spot for them lol

There are some really great Star Wars moments in the PT though. I've always enjoyed the Podracing scene. The lightsaber fight choreography is great throughout. Duel of the Fates is incredible, and the Obi-Wan/Anakin fight in ROTS is awesome.


The best thing IMO that has come out of the prequel trilogy "revival" is the appreciation for Hayden Christensen. It's pretty cool seeing the fans showing him love at all of the events. He seems to be good dude and you can tell he really appreciates how much the fans have shown support for him, especially bringing him back for Ahsoka.
Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3670 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 2:24 am to
quote:

The best thing IMO that has come out of the prequel trilogy "revival" is the appreciation for Hayden Christensen. It's pretty cool seeing the fans showing him love at all of the events. He seems to be good dude and you can tell he really appreciates how much the fans have shown support for him, especially bringing him back for Ahsoka.



He got a lot of hate for his role. There was a period where all lot of fans really hated him for butchering the "films" takening their frustration with the series out on him rather than Lucas and the directions he took with the films.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 2:33 am
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
28040 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:18 am to
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 5:21 am
Posted by sledgehammer
SWLA
Member since Oct 2020
7739 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:50 am to
Execute order 66 scene was great
Also, RIP Coleman Trebor. Dude has no chance going after Jango and Dooku
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96109 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:48 am to
Not really.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70966 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:53 am to
I recently rewatched 1, and while parts were better than I remembered, the bad parts were soooooo bad. Jar Jar literally made me wince from cringe at multiple scenes. To be honest, what this movie needs is dialing down Jar Jar about 20% (he’s so stupid and clumsy that it is legitimately baffling how he is alive) and casting a different actor for Anakin. The script acts like Anakin is 13-14, but they inexplicably cast a young looking 9 year-old to play him instead, and the child actor really wasn’t very good. Those two changes would have improved the movie dramatically.

2 is alright up until about halfway through the movie. When Obi Wan gets to Kamino and Anakin goes to Naboo, the movie completely falls apart. The stuff on geonosis is fun, but makes zero logical sense. It’s a bad movie full of dumb plot, bad acting, and worse pacing. It’s the worst star wars movie.

3 is f$&king great. It constantly oscillates between “so bad it’s good” and “actually, this is peak”. It’s the most rewatchable Star Wars movie, imo. It’s so over the top, but it owns it, and just keeps jumping the shark over and over again until you can no longer be cynical and just start enjoying how silly and absurd it is. I love this movie.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 6:58 am
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4579 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:00 am to
3 is great. I'd argue better that Return of the Jedi just because the Ewoks in Return bring it down.

1 and 2 have some great parts but the love story is wrote poorly along with some wooden acting. I think in episode 1 they should have made Anakin ~14 and had Hayden Christensen play Anakin in all 3 movies.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
11373 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Many people have had a change of heart since the abomination that was the sequel trilogy. The prequels are held in much higher regard now for sure lol

The prequels are still what they are, and bad, for the same reasons. There are no changing their flaws.

It’s just that the sequel trilogy was so bad as well.
Posted by sledgehammer
SWLA
Member since Oct 2020
7739 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:39 am to
quote:

The stuff on geonosis is fun, but makes zero logical sense
It doesn’t get emphasized in the movie, but out of over 200 Jedi who participated in the battle only 30 made it out alive. The Jedi rescue mission was a disastrous slaughter, but the movie treats it like a Boy Scout camp out. Unpopular take but Anakin, Padme, and Obi Wan’s life were not worth 200 dead Jedi.
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
10136 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:47 am to
I will stand by Episode III: Revenge of the Sith being one of the best movies in the entire franchise.

I’ll give you that Episodes I & II are bad. I actually think Episode II may be the worst movie in the franchise. It’s just boring.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:04 am to
quote:

will stand by Episode III: Revenge of the Sith being one of the best movies in the entire franchise.

Agreed, it’s my favorite actually.

I like II also, it adds so much to the lore that still carries on in media and games
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28667 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Anyone else enjoy Star Wars I-II-III?


Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
9465 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:32 am to
For people like me who's in the over 55 crowd 1,2,3 was:

Star Wars
Empire Strike Back
Return of the Jedi

So I loved those true first 3
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
13422 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:34 am to
Compared to the sequels they are great. I had its moments (Darth Mayl fight scene and pod race), II sucked, and III was legit very good.
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10806 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:36 am to
TPM is godawful. Terrible acting, a plot that makes less and less sense the more you apply any kind of logic to it, perhaps the worst miscasting of all time with Jake Lloyd, and oh yeah, Jar Jar motherfricking Binks.

AotC is better, but only because it's slightly less nonsensical. The dialogue is atrocious, though, and the "love story" is equal parts creepy and cringey.

RotS is the best of the three by a country mile, although it doesn't approach any of the OT.

The two best things you can say about the prequels are 1) They were made with a fully thought-out story in mind from the start - yes, that story didn't make a whole hell of a lot of sense, but it was there from the beginning, and 2) Even though it was objectively terrible in a lot of places, the prequel trilogy was made by someone who loved Star Wars. Those two facts alone make it light years better than the execrable sequel trilogy.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43309 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:42 am to
Revenge of the Sith is legit on it's own. By far the best of the prequels.

But because the sequels were so bad people look back on the prequels and think "Well I guess they aren't THAT bad."

Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41654 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:46 am to
The prequels, especially III, have drastically improved because of what has been done in the clone wars series. Now, that is still a flaw in the movies, but that show has done so much to flesh out the story elements that were somewhat rushed. Heck, Anakin's scene in III when he is telling the council how unfair it is he isn't granted Master, in the movie your kind of like well thats a bit of an overreaction dude. Nah, after seeing all the things they've made him do for them that goes against the jedi code and how many times he has basically saved all of them, yea it was a very reasonable reaction.

III is a legit good movie (flawed but good). I and II have definite awesome moments, but just aren't good movies. Dialogue is a huge issue in all of them and really drags down the first two, giving them some very stiff performances. I always thought I and II should have been combined into one movie. Then could have an actual movie of the clone wars, and then have III with the ability to not have Anakin's true fall seem as rushed in the movie since you could show much more of his council issues in the second movie.

The one thing that the sequel movies really ended up showing, is how much the prequels just feel like star wars. I think that has been the biggest contributor to why they are viewed in a more favorable light now. You just don't get the same feeling watching the sequels, hard to describe. Then they were just awful in their own right as well, so the flaws in the prequels don't look nearly as bad in comparison.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 10:34 am
Posted by Hooligan33
Member since Aug 2008
1235 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 10:00 am to
The moment The Last Jedi hit the screens, critics of the prequels (including me) suddenly knew the floor could get a lot lower than they thought.

In my opinion, the first two prequels could have been combined into one movie. Cut out a lot of the silliness and the over the top focus on the love story which was really tough to watch. At the same time, 3 was a really good movie, but I felt the turn that we all knew was coming happened too quickly. One minute Anakin is still doing the right thing and suddenly he is killing Padawans? There should have been some clearer signs and chances where Anakin had to struggle with decisions. That struggle plus more of a focus on Maul and the transition to Tyranus could make the second and third movies. However, once that was taken care of....the ending of that movie was up there with the OG 3.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram