Started By
Message

re: You thought Indiana's schedule this year was bad? Let's take a gander at 2028

Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:53 am to
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116829 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Had they lost on the road to Oregon last year, they would have been sitting right there alongside BYU sweating out the conference championship weekend.


Not going to be a concern when we have 24 playoff teams by the time they play this schedule
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5808 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Wasn't Curt a vocal opponent of scheduling cupcakes?



Quite the opposite. He's said as long as they are rewarding teams for having easy schedules, they are going to have the easiest schedule possible. Once they stop rewarding it, they'll change.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
21138 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:15 am to
quote:


Cignetti wants to schedule the easiest schedule possible with a bunch of 25 year old players

But Lane Kiffin is what is destroying CFB


Por que no los dos?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86829 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:18 am to
No se

Ask the NCAA and SEC and media
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
91257 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I don't blame them they have figured it out.


that's not the takeaway here, teams have scheduled soft in their handful of OOC games for decades that's nothing new.

What is more noteworthy is just how utterly and horrendously awful the Big 10 as a whole. It's why any comparison of the big10 and SEC is entirely moot because once you get past the 3rd or 4th best teams at the top one league has a collection of retarded midgets while the other has teams that could still easily win ~9 games and finish in the top 15.
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
14377 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:27 am to
At worst 10-2 if they are still a dominant team. Penn State and Oregon. What a joke of a schedule and one of those is at home.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
25069 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Why play anyone else? The CFP committee has told everyone (by their actions) strength of schedule is irrelevant and that 10-2 in the Big 10 likely gets you into the CFP. So why risk a non-conf. loss when you know you have a two game margin for error in the Big 10?

Exactly.

They’re all just counting wins and losses neither knowing or caring that the obvious conclusion is that schools should avoid difficult non-conference games at all costs and bringing into question why the SEC is playing 9 games where in a typical year 6-8 teams are all playoff caliber.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
36423 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

The weak OOC schedule is going to break against them just as often as it will for them. Had they lost on the road to Oregon last year, they would have been sitting right there alongside BYU sweating out the conference championship weekend.


that is a reasonable argument.

quote:

Conversely, Miami with 2 losses to unranked teams with a bad ACC schedule and Texas A&M who had a weak SEC schedule and didn't make the conference title game got in because they beat Notre Dame out of conference.


However, can we say Miami got in because they beat ND? Or was it because BYU lost the Big 12 championship game?

Going into the championship game BYU was ranked ahead of Miami. Presumably that was because BYU was 11-1 and Miami was 10-2. Miami had already beaten ND by that point in the season. So if that was a determining factor then they would have been ranked higher than BYU at that point, right? Yet, Miami wasn't, which leads to the only logical reason being that BYU had 1 loss and Miami had 2.

BYU then plays and loses the Big 12 championship game while Miami sits at home. Miami then jumps BYU. Miami did not play. So their resume from the week prior didn't change at all. The only thing that changed was BYU added 2nd loss. It is a pretty strong argument that BYU would have been in ahead of Miami had they simply not been forced to play in the Big 12 championship given they were already ranked ahead of Miami at that time. The same logic would have applied to Indiana as an 11-1 team that did not play in the conf. championship game. Miami was not ranked ahead of any 1 loss teams in the CFP poll going into championship game weekend and no 1 loss major conference team was left out in favor of a 2 loss major conference team.

Miami's SOS only mattered because BYU go a second loss and the CFP's shallow analysis is that 1 loss is better than 2 losses. If Indiana had been sitting at home on championship game weekend with only 1 loss, similar to A&M, they would have gotten in ahead of SOS. So yes, SOS might matter some if the teams being compared had an equal number of losses. But it is clear fewer losses, even against an awful schedule, trumps SOS.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram