
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
You thought Indiana's schedule this year was bad? Let's take a gander at 2028
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:21 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:21 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I don't blame them they have figured it out. But at some point there MUST be some punishment and adjustment from the Committee for playing these schedules
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:24 am to Fun Bunch
They don't play an away game until week 9? Damn
ETA: I'm dumb
ETA: I'm dumb
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 9:36 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:25 am to Salmon
I think its just sorted (kind of) alphabetically home and away but that is a crap schedule
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 9:27 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:25 am to Salmon
Only the first 3 weeks have a set date and they are all at home
Austin Peay
Eastern Michigan
Miami of Ohio
the first 3 weeks to start the season
Austin Peay
Eastern Michigan
Miami of Ohio
the first 3 weeks to start the season
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 9:28 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:33 am to Fun Bunch
Wasn't Curt a vocal opponent of scheduling cupcakes?
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:37 am to Fun Bunch
Cignetti probably has a lot of influence over their non-conference schedule. It’s why they’ve only played a total of 2-3 ranked away games in the last 2 years.
Dude is a fricking pussy who’s afraid of getting humiliated in away games against teams that match him in physicality and coaching. I’ve grown to dislike him more over the past year.
Dude is a fricking pussy who’s afraid of getting humiliated in away games against teams that match him in physicality and coaching. I’ve grown to dislike him more over the past year.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 9:41 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:38 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Only the first 3 weeks have a set date and they are all at home
Austin Peay
Eastern Michigan
Miami of Ohio
Why play anyone else? The CFP committee has told everyone (by their actions) strength of schedule is irrelevant and that 10-2 in the Big 10 likely gets you into the CFP. So why risk a non-conf. loss when you know you have a two game margin for error in the Big 10?
Indiana played a crap schedule in 2024. They literally played one team who was ranked at the time of the game (No. 2 OSU) and lost by 23 points. Yet, that 11-1 was seen as more important than the fact it game against relatively weak competition. Last year Texas went on the road and lost to OSU. That ultimately brought their record from 10-2 to 9-3 and allowed both an Oklahoma team who they beat soundly and a JMU team who played no major conference opponents to get into the CFP ahead of them.
Don't blame Indiana. Blame the CFP who is essentially encouraging teams to play bad schedules.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:39 am to Black n Gold
Cignetti wants to schedule the easiest schedule possible with a bunch of 25 year old players
But Lane Kiffin is what is destroying CFB
But Lane Kiffin is what is destroying CFB
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:41 am to Alt26
Yes, we know, that is why i said I don't blame them, they have figured it out
No good team should every play anyone of note until the CFP changes
No good team should every play anyone of note until the CFP changes
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:47 am to Fun Bunch
That league schedule was made in 2023 when everyone assumed Penn State and Oregon were bonafide National title contenders.
Washington had national championship contender in 2023 after finishing ‘22 in top 10, were ranked 7th when this schedule was formed, then played for the title after winning the final PAC and lost their HC to Alabama. Wisconsin had yet to fall off a cliff.
When the conference expanded to 18 teams by adding Oregon, Washington, USC, and UCLA, they established a five-year scheduling framework known as the "Flex Protect XVIII" model. On that date in October 2023, the Big Ten revealed the complete slate of conference opponents for every season from 2024 through 2028.
Washington had national championship contender in 2023 after finishing ‘22 in top 10, were ranked 7th when this schedule was formed, then played for the title after winning the final PAC and lost their HC to Alabama. Wisconsin had yet to fall off a cliff.
When the conference expanded to 18 teams by adding Oregon, Washington, USC, and UCLA, they established a five-year scheduling framework known as the "Flex Protect XVIII" model. On that date in October 2023, the Big Ten revealed the complete slate of conference opponents for every season from 2024 through 2028.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 9:57 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:00 am to Alt26
quote:
quote:
Only the first 3 weeks have a set date and they are all at home
Austin Peay
Eastern Michigan
Miami of Ohio
Why play anyone else? The CFP committee has told everyone (by their actions) strength of schedule is irrelevant and that 10-2 in the Big 10 likely gets you into the CFP. So why risk a non-conf. loss when you know you have a two game margin for error in the Big 10?
Indiana played a crap schedule in 2024. They literally played one team who was ranked at the time of the game (No. 2 OSU) and lost by 23 points. Yet, that 11-1 was seen as more important than the fact it game against relatively weak competition. Last year Texas went on the road and lost to OSU. That ultimately brought their record from 10-2 to 9-3 and allowed both an Oklahoma team who they beat soundly and a JMU team who played no major conference opponents to get into the CFP ahead of them.
Don't blame Indiana. Blame the CFP who is essentially encouraging teams to play bad schedules.
Eh, I wouldn't say that.
The weak OOC schedule is going to break against them just as often as it will for them. Had they lost on the road to Oregon last year, they would have been sitting right there alongside BYU sweating out the conference championship weekend. Their best win heading into the postseason would have been unranked Illinois, and they wouldn't have had a shot to beat OSU to add another scalp on the resume.
Conversely, Miami with 2 losses to unranked teams with a bad ACC schedule and Texas A&M who had a weak SEC schedule and didn't make the conference title game got in because they beat Notre Dame out of conference. Miami definitely would have been out and A&M would have been sweating bullets in the final week or two had they scheduled Bumfrick Tech instead of Notre Dame.
As it was, an 11 - 1 Indiana was sweating its spot in the final weeks of 2024 with no ranked wins at all on their schedule, had to go on the road for the playoff game, and got pounded in said game.
Ultimately, I think last year was a bit flukey in that Oklahoma win over Alabama set off something of a chain reaction all over the rankings. Oklahoma last year or SMU the year prior were the two worst teams to make the playoffs since this thing started. If Alabama hadn't puked all over themselves in a game they dominated and should have won by all rights...
- Oklahoma would have been definitely out
- The committee wouldn't have had to have done that wizard dance to magically jump Alabama over Notre Dame after the Auburn game, and Alabama would have definitely been in
- There would have been 2 spots for the three of Miami, Notre Dame, and Texas; Texas' win over OU wouldn't have meant as much, but we would have been weighing their wins over Vandy and A&M against their losses to a 4 - 8 team and getting hammered in mid-November at home by UGA
That would have been a much more palatable picture to what the playoff should have looked like.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 10:04 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:00 am to Fun Bunch
I'd love to see a snaps played breakdown for the top B10 teams compared to the top SEC teams. Logic would say their players have a lot less miles on their legs come the playoffs.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:02 am to Fun Bunch
I know the Big Ten has a weird flex scheduling model that protects high-profile matchups/rivalries, so it's probably pretty jacked up and can favor historical bottom-dwellers like Indiana who is now suddenly a powerhouse.
Just my best guess, at least.
Just my best guess, at least.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:12 am to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
Oklahoma last year or SMU the year prior were the two worst teams to make the playoffs since this thing started. If Alabama hadn't puked all over themselves in a game they dominated and should have won by all rights
Clemson 2024
James Madison 2025
Tulane 2025
All just as bad and the G5s were worse
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:20 am to Fun Bunch
It's a good point. We all can agree right now that Indiana is a top 10 program in the country. They've been good the last couple of years and look to be at least top 20 good again this year if not better.
Just schedule someone like NC State or Houston. If they had home and homes against either of those 2 teams they likely win by 20 and no one really dogs them because they are playing a P4 team
Just schedule someone like NC State or Houston. If they had home and homes against either of those 2 teams they likely win by 20 and no one really dogs them because they are playing a P4 team
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:31 am to The Third Leg
quote:
quote:
Oklahoma last year or SMU the year prior were the two worst teams to make the playoffs since this thing started. If Alabama hadn't puked all over themselves in a game they dominated and should have won by all rights
Clemson 2024
James Madison 2025
Tulane 2025
All just as bad and the G5s were worse
I forgot my "at large" modifier. That being said, Clemson in 2024 was probably a touch better than both SMU in 2024 and Oklahoma last year, at least at the end of the year.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:33 am to Fun Bunch
That’s unwatchable. How is that enjoyable as a fan?
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:37 am to Buckeye06
quote:
Just schedule someone like NC State or Houston. If they had home and homes against either of those 2 teams they likely win by 20 and no one really dogs them because they are playing a P4 team
That doesn't mean they'd play within 2-3 years though.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:48 am to Fun Bunch
B1G conference schedules for most teams are going to look weak most years because they watered the conference down with adding trash programs like Maryland and Rutgers.
There’s really only 6 good football programs in the conference (OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, USC, Indiana) out of 18 teams. If you’re one of those 6, then you only really play 2 or 3 difficult conference games a year. So scheduling 3 shitty OOC teams and you end up with what Indiana has.
There’s really only 6 good football programs in the conference (OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, USC, Indiana) out of 18 teams. If you’re one of those 6, then you only really play 2 or 3 difficult conference games a year. So scheduling 3 shitty OOC teams and you end up with what Indiana has.

Popular
Back to top

12














