- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:57 pm to ForeverLSU02
Maybe they should have just knocked it down?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:57 pm to BeaumontBengal
Not simultaneous if someone had possession first. Absolute travesty.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:57 pm to BeaumontBengal
Green bay had the ball clutched tight to his chest and Tate just stuck his arm in there at the end. Plus it was the most blatant OPI i've ever seen
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:57 pm to TigerAlumni2010
How can anyone say that was the right call? It's the WORST call and subsequent replay I've seen in my life.
Heads are exploding and more heads will roll.
Heads are exploding and more heads will roll.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:57 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
I'm pretty sure by the time the db had 2 feet on the ground Tate had 2 hands on the ball.
NO.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:57 pm to BeaumontBengal
Tate didn't come anywhere near catching that ball. Anybody who can't concede that is retarded. 
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:58 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
I'm pretty sure by the time the db had 2 feet on the ground Tate had 2 hands on the ball.
just the angle that Tate had underneath the GB player tells me there was no way in hell he had any type of possession of that ball
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:58 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
I'm pretty sure by the time the db had 2 feet on the ground Tate had 2 hands on the ball.
Which is not simultaneous possession, but thanks for playing...
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:59 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
Simultaneous possession. Now pi should have been called but that's a different story.
I agree with everything you said except for what I quoted above
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:59 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:
For all the flack these replacements have gotten, they made the right call there.
Not even close. GB came down with the ball. WR was Johnny come lately
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:59 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
Wr had 2 hands on it the whole time = td
Never go full retard
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:59 pm to ForeLSU
I would say two hands on the ball is possession. What else is if that's not?
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 9/24/12 at 10:59 pm to Rickety Cricket
quote:
For once, I have to agree with Peej
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:04 pm to BeaumontBengal
So every time a guy intercepts the ball, you can just touch it with your hands and make it a "catch"?
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 11:11 pm
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:06 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
Maybe they should have just knocked it down?
Maybe the refs should get it right? Or throw a flag.
Don't bring that hindsight nonsense here.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:08 pm to BeaumontBengal
tate had a green bay packer pressed against his chest, not a football
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:08 pm to BeaumontBengal
You sir, are not very informed about football.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:08 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:no he didnt jackass, go to sleep
BeaumontBengal
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:09 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:which game are you talking about? because that's not what happened tonight
Wr had 2 hands on it the whole time = td
Popular
Back to top


1






