- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did San Francisco draft a QB at #3 if they weren't going to use him right away?
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Do you really think Shanahan gives a shite about public pressure?
They traded up for Mac Jones and bent to public pressure
If anything he’s the type to double down.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:21 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
These guys traded all the way up to get him. That just feels like a tremendous waste of money having a guy ride the bench like that.
they are trying to compensate for the huge mistake of trading for jimmy, who never showed anyone he was a capable starting QB but because he played for Belicheck everyone thought he was the next brady.
people downvoted me at the time for saying he hasnt shown anything to justify the hype around him and i was right again as usual. people dont like to hear the truth or rational opinions based on facts but you cant just hope and guess based on a guy who only started two or three games when it comes to getting him in a costly trade as your new starting QB
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:22 pm to Fus0623
quote:
Trey Lance has been hurt..
I watched his first start. He couldn't hit the broad side of a barn throwing so they ran him up the middle nearly 20 times. Jimmy G is just so much better at this point that giving up so much to get Lance feels questionable.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:24 pm to Mr. Elvert
quote:
Yep. Not sure why op is overreacting. Mahommes sat yr 1 too
Different situation.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:27 pm to keakar
quote:
the huge mistake of trading for jimmy
quote:A truly terrible franchise-altering mistake. A 2nd round pick for a starter who's gone 31-13? A total disaster.
a costly trade
quote:They clearly didn't downvote you enough.
people downvoted me at the time
This post was edited on 12/19/21 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:28 pm to DawgHorns
Lance has big Mitch Trubisky vibes
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:32 pm to RemouladeSawce
quote:
Do you really think Shanahan gives a shite about public pressure?
If anything he’s the type to double down.
As the story goes, he traded up for Mac but the public pressure got those above him to decide on Lance
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:33 pm to keakar
quote:
they are trying to compensate for the huge mistake of trading for jimmy,
They didn't give up THAT much and made a super bowl with him
Posted on 12/19/21 at 6:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
Chris Simms said he wanted Mac Jones. So he definitely wanted Mac Jones.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:00 pm to RollTide1987
Seems like the were anticipating trading Jimmy G.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:03 pm to RollTide1987
You mean why are they being smart with their raw QB?
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:07 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Sitting used to be the norm, very recent thing for these guys to play right away
Yeah, its pretty funny that people were totally comfortable sitting rookie QBs back when they signed contracts that made them one of the highest paid players on the team.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:21 pm to RollTide1987
They wanted a young long term QB who could add a run game element.
They’ve said from the beginning they want to develop Lance. It’s not complicated. Jimmy G has played well the last 7 or so games, no reason to rush an FCS QB that has started only 12 games. The kid has the highest ceiling of any of the 2021 QBs . If he remained in college one more year he would have likely gone 1.01 this year.
They’ve said from the beginning they want to develop Lance. It’s not complicated. Jimmy G has played well the last 7 or so games, no reason to rush an FCS QB that has started only 12 games. The kid has the highest ceiling of any of the 2021 QBs . If he remained in college one more year he would have likely gone 1.01 this year.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:49 pm to Chucktown_Badger
max kellerman's comments
quote:
"The point is, the correlation that can be made, is that your status falls, vis-a-vis White quarterbacks, and so that's why my atennas are up when I notice one, two and three this year- White guy, White guy, White guy. But that may be correct. We need to see in the end how these guys turn out as pros."
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
Same people reporting that story also said with 100 % certainty SF was taking Mac. It doesn’t pass the smell test. Why spend three 1sts on a guy who doesn’t add anything new to your offense except durability? Almost like the media was wrong.
Posted on 12/19/21 at 8:57 pm to RollTide1987
Why did the chiefs draft Mahomes in at 10 if they weren’t going to use him right away??
Posted on 12/19/21 at 9:16 pm to LSUMJ
quote:
Why did the chiefs draft Mahomes in at 10 if they weren’t going to use him right away??
There’s a huge difference between 3 and 10 in the draft and even more so for QBs. Nobody trades away pics to a twelve and two future first rounders for a 10th overall. If you are going to trade away three first round pics the y needs to be able to make an immediate impact, not sit behind Jimmy G.
This post was edited on 12/19/21 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 12/19/21 at 10:00 pm to go ta hell ole miss
Shanahan has a contract that allows him to look beyond one year.
Popular
Back to top
