Started By
Message
locked post

Wall Street Journal: Why College Football should be banned

Posted on 5/6/12 at 2:52 pm
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 2:52 pm
LINK

quote:

In more than 20 years I've spent studying the issue, I have yet to hear a convincing argument that college football has anything do with what is presumably the primary purpose of higher education: academics.

That's because college football has no academic purpose. Which is why it needs to be banned. A radical solution, yes. But necessary in today's times.


Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 2:53 pm to
Wall Street Journal hates LSU
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
21659 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 2:58 pm to
Posted by GrizzlePickle
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2011
1791 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 2:58 pm to


Posted by KingwoodLsuFan
Member since Aug 2008
11447 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70061 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:00 pm to
Buzz Bissinger is fricking douche. No one would know who the frick he is without football.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164011 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:03 pm to
I will ban him from life.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4641 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

has anything do with what is presumably the primary purpose of higher education: academics.
guess we should ban all sports and support the math club.

Sounds like someone who wasn't able to make the team in high school and has been bitter since.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35305 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:09 pm to
Bissinger is a great writer. Too bad he's such a tool
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:09 pm to
So this guy would rather have guys not go to college at all rather than have guys play football and have a shitty major?
This post was edited on 5/6/12 at 3:10 pm
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

the primary purpose of higher education: academics.
The real primary purpose of higher education: $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:41 pm to
Malcolm Gladwell has joined the chorus and they will be debating that college football should be banned.

How different are dogfighting and football?

LINK
This post was edited on 5/6/12 at 3:42 pm
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:42 pm to
If college football were to be banned, that would leave one real money making sport in schools, and that's a sport where a lot of schools actually lose money. Does anyone think that if college football ever goes away (due to head injuries/other issues), that many universities may just say frick it to college sports altogether?
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:43 pm to
Banning football would be one way to end Title IX...well, all sports on a college campus.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421242 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

that many universities may just say frick it to college sports altogether?

i think that is the end goal for this niche
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31894 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:44 pm to
Without college football, many schools, including LSU, are a lot less successful academically, bc nobody wants to go there
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

The average student gets nothing from football programs that remain sacrosanct despite tuition increases.


Ask the average student at a major school if they want those football programs to go away.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Malcolm Gladwell has joined the chorus and they will be debating that college football should be banned.

How different are dogfighting and football?


Gladwell is a smart man who will present a reasoned opinion. You may disagree with his arguments, but they won't be silly, they won't be unsupported, and they won't be nonsense. I'm not sure I've ever heard Gladwell say something that I would characterize as abjectly stupid.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

If college football were to be banned, that would leave one real money making sport in schools, and that's a sport where a lot of schools actually lose money. Does anyone think that if college football ever goes away (due to head injuries/other issues), that many universities may just say frick it to college sports altogether?


Their hand would be forced. You've got Title IX on one hand, and then you've got no cash flow on the other. So, yeah, they might just say "frick it, we'll have intramural sports".
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Their hand would be forced. You've got Title IX on one hand, and then you've got no cash flow on the other. So, yeah, they might just say "frick it, we'll have intramural sports".


Agreed. Why would schools that lose money on basketball bother keeping women's field hockey afloat? Seems easier to cut all those scholarships and to not waste money on facilities, coaches, and other expenses.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram