- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Very important point with the new OT Rule.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm
Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?
The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.
Bad coaching decision.
The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.
Bad coaching decision.
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 6:08 am
17
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm to Bham4Tide
Terrible decision for sure
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm to Bham4Tide
So stupid taking the ball first
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:58 pm to Bham4Tide
As Romo said, maybe he thought his defense needed some rest.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:59 pm to Bham4Tide
It's basically like college the first 2 possessions. Why not kick it so you know how many points you need to extend the game?
If the possessions are switched then Niners are going for it on 4th and goal instead of kicked a FG.
And KC might be punting on 4th and 1 at midfield.
Nobody in college takes the ball in OT first but Niners did lolol
If the possessions are switched then Niners are going for it on 4th and goal instead of kicked a FG.
And KC might be punting on 4th and 1 at midfield.
Nobody in college takes the ball in OT first but Niners did lolol
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:59 pm to Bham4Tide
Absolutely horrible coaching decision.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:00 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
As Romo said, maybe he thought his defense needed some rest.
Well they can rest now since they won't be attending the post game celebration.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:01 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:
Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?
The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.
Bad coaching by decision.
If the team score a touchdown game is over.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:01 pm to Bham4Tide
Well if both teams had scored a td youd wish you had elected to receive, its very debatable either way
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:03 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:And if both teams kick field goals or score TDs you give the other team the ball back to try to win with a FG.
Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?
The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.
Bad coaching by decision.
Then people would call that a bad coaching decision.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:03 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
If the team score a touchdown game is over.
not anymore
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:04 pm to josh336
No, it 100% rewards the team that goes second.
If the first team scores a TD you have 4 downs AND the option to walk it off with a 2pt.
If the first team scores a TD you have 4 downs AND the option to walk it off with a 2pt.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:04 pm to Bham4Tide
With the college OT rules, going second is the clear choice.
With the old NFL sudden death, receiving the kick was the automatic choice.
With this new NFL playoff rule, there's pros and cons for each and thus no absolute clear cut choice.
With the old NFL sudden death, receiving the kick was the automatic choice.
With this new NFL playoff rule, there's pros and cons for each and thus no absolute clear cut choice.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:04 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:
Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?
If it’s still tied after each team has had a possession, it’s sudden death. So you would obviously want the ball first.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:04 pm to UltimaParadox
No, receiving the ball is the correct possession. If you equal your opponent's score, then you get the ball for the win.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:05 pm to josh336
quote:
Well if both teams had scored a td youd wish you had elected to receive, its very debatable either way
That’s an insane strategy to me. Playing for the 3rd possession?
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:05 pm to Bham4Tide
He just did what the NFL told him to do.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:05 pm to boston vol
quote:
it’s still tied after each team has had a possession, it’s sudden death. So you would obviously want the ball first.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:06 pm to UltimaParadox
quote:
So stupid taking the ball first
Not really. If you score, you have a chance to stop them and win. If they score, you have a chance to win outright with a FG on the next drive.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:06 pm to Bham4Tide
You have to take the ball. If both teams score a touchdown, the game becomes sudden death. You can’t just look at it from the first possession.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News